Refractory wounds are complicated multistep biological processes that can lead to severe complications in patients. Selective autophagy plays a crucial role in precisely controlling the quality of intracellular components and regulating biological behavior. This review explores the features and underlying mechanisms of various types of selective autophagy and highlights their implications in burn injury and wound healing.
Recent Advances:
In-depth studies have underscored the critical role of selective autophagy, including mitophagy, endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-phagy, pexophagy, xenophagy, lysophagy, ferritinophagy, and lipophagy, in effectively controlling the quality of intracellular components and regulating biological behavior, which may enhance wound-healing process.
Critical Issues:
Autophagy is a housekeeping and self-renewal process that utilizes lysosomal machinery to degrade and recycle cellular components, thereby enhancing cellular adaptability to stressful conditions. In addition to nonselective bulk degradation, autophagy selectively recycles specific cell constituents, including mitochondria, ER, peroxisomes, pathogens, lysosomes, lipid droplets, and ferritin. The effective management of the quality of cellular components during wound healing remains a challenge in clinical practice.
Future Directions:
Understanding the basic mechanisms and intricate crosstalk underlying selective autophagy may facilitate the development of comprehensive strategies and therapeutic targets for wound healing.
SenCK. Human wound and its burden: Updated 2022 compendium of estimates. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2023; 12(12):657–670; doi: 10.1089/wound.2023.0150
2.
PosnettJ, GottrupF, LundgrenH, et al.The resource impact of wounds on health-care providers in Europe. J Wound Care, 2009; 18(4):154–161; doi: 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.4.41607
3.
GuestJF, AyoubN, McIlwraithT, et al.Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK. BMJ Open, 2015; 5(12):e009283; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009283
4.
JiangY, HuangS, FuX, et al.Epidemiology of chronic cutaneous wounds in China. Wound Repair Regen, 2011; 19(2):181–188; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00666.x
5.
VannellaKM, WynnTA. Mechanisms of organ injury and repair by macrophages. Annu Rev Physiol, 2017; 79:593–617; doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034356
6.
PeñaOA, MartinP. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of skin wound healing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2024; 25(8):599–616; doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00715-1
TakeoM, LeeW, ItoM. Wound healing and skin regeneration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2015; 5(1):a023267; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a023267
9.
MartinP, NunanR. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of repair in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol, 2015; 173(2):370–378; doi: 10.1111/bjd.13954
10.
GreavesNS, AshcroftKJ, BaguneidM, et al.Current understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms in fibroplasia and angiogenesis during acute wound healing. J Dermatol Sci, 2013; 72(3):206–217; doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.07.008
11.
GriffinMF, desJardins-ParkHE, MascharakS, et al.Understanding the impact of fibroblast heterogeneity on skin fibrosis. Dis Model Mech, 2020; 13(6):dmm044164; doi: 10.1242/dmm.044164
12.
JiangD, GuoR, MachensH-G, et al.Diversity of fibroblasts and their roles in wound healing. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2023; 15(3):a041222; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041222
13.
ZhengH, ChengX, JinL, et al.Recent advances in strategies to target the behavior of macrophages in wound healing. Biomed Pharmacother, 2023; 165:115199; doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115199
14.
AmiciJM, TaiebC, Le Floc’hC, et al.The impact of visible scars on well-being and quality of life: An international epidemiological survey in adults. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2023; 37 (Suppl 3)(S3):3–6; doi: 10.1111/jdv.18856
15.
WilkinsonHN, HardmanMJ. Wound healing: Cellular mechanisms and pathological outcomes. Open Biol, 2020; 10(9):200223; doi: 10.1098/rsob.200223
16.
LiS, RenickP, SenkowskyJ, et al.Diagnostics for wound infections. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2021; 10(6):317–327; doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.1103
17.
FalangaV, IsseroffRR, SoulikaAM, et al.Chronic wounds. 2023.
18.
ArmstrongDG, TanT-W, BoultonAJM, et al.Diabetic foot ulcers: A review. JAMA, 2023; 330(1):62–75; doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.10578
19.
HallC, HardinC, CorkinsCJ, et al.Pathophysiologic mechanisms and current treatments for cutaneous sequelae of burn wounds. Compr Physiol, 2017; 8(1):371–405; doi: 10.1002/cphy.c170016
20.
FanstoneR, PriceP. Burn contracture risk factors and measurement in low-middle income countries: A clinical perspective. Burns, 2024; 50(2):466–473; doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.09.007
21.
GalluzziL, BaehreckeEH, BallabioA, et al.Molecular definitions of autophagy and related processes. Embo J, 2017; 36(13):1811–1836; doi: 10.15252/embj.201796697
22.
ZhuY, LiH, DingS, et al.Autophagy inhibition promotes phagocytosis of macrophage and protects mice from methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. J Cell Biochem, 2018; 119(6):4808–4814; doi: 10.1002/jcb.26677
23.
SkendrosP, MitroulisI, RitisK. Autophagy in neutrophils: From granulopoiesis to neutrophil extracellular traps. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2018; 6:109; doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00109
24.
ShiY, WangS, LiuD, et al.Exosomal miR-4645-5p from hypoxic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells facilitates diabetic wound healing by restoring keratinocyte autophagy. Burns Trauma, 2024; 12:tkad058; doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkad058
25.
LinZ, LiL-Y, ChenL, et al.Lonicerin promotes wound healing in diabetic rats by enhancing blood vessel regeneration through Sirt1-mediated autophagy. Acta Pharmacol Sin, 2024; 45(4):815–830; doi: 10.1038/s41401-023-01193-5
26.
LiangD, LinW-J, RenM, et al.m6A reader YTHDC1 modulates autophagy by targeting SQSTM1 in diabetic skin. Autophagy, 2022; 18(6):1318–1337; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1974175
27.
ChenX, TongG, FanJ, et al.FGF21 promotes migration and differentiation of epidermal cells during wound healing via SIRT1-dependent autophagy. Br J Pharmacol, 2022; 179(5):1102–1121; doi: 10.1111/bph.15701
28.
QiangL, YangS, CuiY-H, et al.Keratinocyte autophagy enables the activation of keratinocytes and fibroblastsand facilitates wound healing. Autophagy, 2021; 17(9):2128–2143; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1816342
29.
LiW, HeP, HuangY, et al.Selective autophagy of intracellular organelles: Recent research advances. Theranostics, 2021; 11(1):222–256; doi: 10.7150/thno.49860
JohansenT, LamarkT. Selective autophagy: ATG8 family proteins, LIR motifs and cargo receptors. J Mol Biol, 2020; 432(1):80–103; doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.07.016
32.
HerasKL, IgartuaM, Santos-VizcainoE, et al.Cell-based dressings: A journey through chronic wound management. Biomater Adv, 2022; 135:212738; doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212738
33.
AnY, LinS, TanX, et al.Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells and application to skin wound healing. Cell Prolif, 2021; 54(3):e12993; doi: 10.1111/cpr.12993
34.
TenenhausM, RennekampffH-O. Current concepts in tissue engineering: Skin and wound. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016; 138(3 Suppl):42S–50S; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002685
35.
SorgH, TilkornDJ, HagerS, et al.Skin wound healing: An update on the current knowledge and concepts. Eur Surg Res, 2017; 58(1–2):81–94; doi: 10.1159/000454919
36.
YaoR-Q, RenC, XiaZ-F, et al.Organelle-specific autophagy in inflammatory diseases: A potential therapeutic target underlying the quality control of multiple organelles. Autophagy, 2021; 17(2):385–401; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1725377
MizushimaN, YoshimoriT, OhsumiY. The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2011; 27:107–132; doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154005
NishimuraT, ToozeSA. Emerging roles of ATG proteins and membrane lipids in autophagosome formation. Cell Discov, 2020; 6(1):32; doi: 10.1038/s41421-020-0161-3
41.
SchuckS. Microautophagy—distinct molecular mechanisms handle cargoes of many sizes. J Cell Sci, 2020; 133(17):jcs246322; doi: 10.1242/jcs.246322
42.
KuchitsuY, TaguchiT. Lysosomal microautophagy: An emerging dimension in mammalian autophagy. Trends Cell Biol, 2024; 34(7):606–616; doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.11.005
43.
SahuR, KaushikS, ClementCC, et al.Microautophagy of cytosolic proteins by late endosomes. Dev Cell, 2011; 20(1):131–139; doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.12.003
44.
KaushikS, CuervoAM. The coming of age of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2018; 19(6):365–381; doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0001-6
45.
KirkinV, RogovVV. A diversity of selective autophagy receptors determines the specificity of the autophagy pathway. Mol Cell, 2019; 76(2):268–285; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.09.005
46.
VargasJNS, HamasakiM, KawabataT, et al.The mechanisms and roles of selective autophagy in mammals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2023; 24(3):167–185; doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00542-2
47.
GeislerS, HolmströmKM, SkujatD, et al.PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy is dependent on VDAC1 and p62/SQSTM1. Nat Cell Biol, 2010; 12(2):119–131; doi: 10.1038/ncb2012
48.
ChenY, DornGW. PINK1-phosphorylated mitofusin 2 is a Parkin receptor for culling damaged mitochondria. Science, 2013; 340(6131):471–475; doi: 10.1126/science.1231031
49.
SafiulinaD, KuumM, ChoubeyV, et al.Mitochondrial transport proteins RHOT1 and RHOT2 serve as docking sites for PRKN-mediated mitophagy. Autophagy, 2019; 15(5):930–931; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1586260
50.
LuY, LiZ, ZhangS, et al.Cellular mitophagy: Mechanism, roles in diseases and small molecule pharmacological regulation. Theranostics, 2023; 13(2):736–766; doi: 10.7150/thno.79876
NguyenTN, PadmanBS, LazarouM. Deciphering the molecular signals of PINK1/Parkin mitophagy. Trends Cell Biol, 2016; 26(10):733–744; doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.05.008
53.
OnishiM, YamanoK, SatoM, et al.Molecular mechanisms and physiological functions of mitophagy. Embo J, 2021; 40(3):e104705; doi: 10.15252/embj.2020104705
54.
WeiY, ChiangW-C, SumpterR, et al.Prohibitin 2 is an inner mitochondrial membrane mitophagy receptor. Cell, 2017; 168(1–2):224–238.e10; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.042
55.
SagarS, FaizanMI, ChaudharyN, et al.Obesity impairs cardiolipin-dependent mitophagy and therapeutic intercellular mitochondrial transfer ability of mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Dis, 2023; 14(5):324; doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05810-3
56.
MochidaK, NakatogawaH. ER-phagy: Selective autophagy of the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO Rep, 2022; 23(8):e55192; doi: 10.15252/embr.202255192
57.
SmithMD, HarleyME, KempAJ, et al.CCPG1 is a non-canonical autophagy cargo receptor essential for ER-phagy and pancreatic ER proteostasis. Dev Cell, 2018; 44(2):217–232.e11; doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.11.024
ReggioA, BuonomoV, BerkaneR, et al.Role of FAM134 paralogues in endoplasmic reticulum remodeling, ER-phagy, and Collagen quality control. EMBO Rep, 2021; 22(9):e52289; doi: 10.15252/embr.202052289
60.
GrumatiP, MorozziG, HölperS, et al.Full length RTN3 regulates turnover of tubular endoplasmic reticulum via selective autophagy. Elife, 2017; 6:e25555; doi: 10.7554/eLife.25555
61.
ChenQ, XiaoY, ChaiP, et al.ATL3 Is a tubular ER-phagy receptor for GABARAP-mediated selective autophagy. Curr Biol, 2019; 29(5):846–855.e6; doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.041
62.
ChinoH, HattaT, NatsumeT, et al.Intrinsically disordered protein TEX264 mediates ER-phagy. Mol Cell, 2019; 74(5):909–921.e6; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.033
63.
ManciasJD, KimmelmanAC. Mechanisms of selective autophagy in normal physiology and cancer. J Mol Biol, 2016; 428(9 Pt A):1659–1680; doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.027
64.
ZhangJ, TripathiDN, JingJ, et al.ATM functions at the peroxisome to induce pexophagy in response to ROS. Nat Cell Biol, 2015; 17(10):1259–1269; doi: 10.1038/ncb3230
65.
Hara-KugeS, FujikiY. The peroxin Pex14p is involved in LC3-dependent degradation of mammalian peroxisomes. Exp Cell Res, 2008; 314(19):3531–3541; doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.09.015
66.
LinC-Y, NozawaT, Minowa-NozawaA, et al.LAMTOR2/LAMTOR1 complex is required for TAX1BP1-mediated xenophagy. Cell Microbiol, 2019; 21(4):e12981; doi: 10.1111/cmi.12981
67.
MostowyS, Sancho-ShimizuV, HamonMA, et al.p62 and NDP52 proteins target intracytosolic Shigella and Listeria to different autophagy pathways. J Biol Chem, 2011; 286(30):26987–26995; doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.223610
68.
BansalM, MoharirSC, SailasreeSP, et al.Optineurin promotes autophagosome formation by recruiting the autophagy-related Atg12-5-16L1 complex to phagophores containing the Wipi2 protein. J Biol Chem, 2018; 293(1):132–147; doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.801944
69.
XuW, OcakU, GaoL, et al.Selective autophagy as a therapeutic target for neurological diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2021; 78(4):1369–1392; doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03667-9
70.
BB, MS, FL. Aggrephagy at a glance. Journal of Cell Science, 2023; 136(10); doi: 10.1242/jcs.260888
71.
ManciasJD, WangX, GygiSP, et al.Quantitative proteomics identifies NCOA4 as the cargo receptor mediating ferritinophagy. Nature, 2014; 509(7498):105–109; doi: 10.1038/nature13148
72.
RobichaudS, FairmanG, VijithakumarV, et al.Identification of novel lipid droplet factors that regulate lipophagy and cholesterol efflux in macrophage foam cells. Autophagy, 2021; 17(11):3671–3689; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1886839
73.
ZhangS, PengX, YangS, et al.The regulation, function, and role of lipophagy, a form of selective autophagy, in metabolic disorders. Cell Death Dis, 2022; 13(2):132; doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04593-3
74.
WangL, KlionskyDJ, ShenH-M. The emerging mechanisms and functions of microautophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2023; 24(3):186–203; doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00529-z
75.
SpinelliJB, HaigisMC. The multifaceted contributions of mitochondria to cellular metabolism. Nat Cell Biol, 2018; 20(7):745–754; doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0124-1
76.
BhattiJS, BhattiGK, ReddyPH. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in metabolic disorders—A step towards mitochondria based therapeutic strategies. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, 2017; 1863(5):1066–1077; doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.11.010
NakatogawaH, IchimuraY, OhsumiY. Atg8, a ubiquitin-like protein required for autophagosome formation, mediates membrane tethering and hemifusion. Cell, 2007; 130(1):165–178; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.021
80.
LazarouM, SliterDA, KaneLA, et al.The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy. Nature, 2015; 524(7565):309–314; doi: 10.1038/nature14893
81.
MurakawaT, YamaguchiO, HashimotoA, et al.Bcl-2-like protein 13 is a mammalian Atg32 homologue that mediates mitophagy and mitochondrial fragmentation. Nat Commun, 2015; 6(1):7527; doi: 10.1038/ncomms8527
82.
WuW, LinC, WuK, et al.FUNDC1 regulates mitochondrial dynamics at the ER-mitochondrial contact site under hypoxic conditions. Embo J, 2016; 35(13):1368–1384; doi: 10.15252/embj.201593102
83.
KubliDA, QuinsayMN, HuangC, et al.Bnip3 functions as a mitochondrial sensor of oxidative stress during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2008; 295(5):H2025–H2031; doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00552.2008
84.
SchweersRL, ZhangJ, RandallMS, et al.NIX is required for programmed mitochondrial clearance during reticulocyte maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007; 104(49):19500–19505; doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708818104
85.
ZhangT, XueL, LiL, et al.BNIP3 protein suppresses PINK1 Kinase proteolytic cleavage to promote mitophagy. J Biol Chem, 2016; 291(41):21616–21629; doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.733410
86.
DingW-X, NiH-M, LiM, et al.Nix is critical to two distinct phases of mitophagy, reactive oxygen species-mediated autophagy induction and Parkin-ubiquitin-p62-mediated mitochondrial priming. J Biol Chem, 2010; 285(36):27879–27890; doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.119537
87.
AjoolabadyA, WangS, KroemerG, et al.ER stress in cardiometabolic diseases: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutics. Endocr Rev, 2021; 42(6):839–871; doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnab006
88.
ChenX, ShiC, HeM, et al.Endoplasmic reticulum stress: Molecular mechanism and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2023; 8(1):352; doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01570-w
89.
RashidH-O, YadavRK, KimH-R, et al.ER stress: Autophagy induction, inhibition and selection. Autophagy, 2015; 11(11):1956–1977; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1091141
90.
ReggioriF, MolinariM. ER-phagy: Mechanisms, regulation, and diseases connected to the lysosomal clearance of the endoplasmic reticulum. Physiol Rev, 2022; 102(3):1393–1448; doi: 10.1152/physrev.00038.2021
91.
WilkinsonS. ER-phagy: Shaping up and destressing the endoplasmic reticulum. Febs J, 2019; 286(14):2645–2663; doi: 10.1111/febs.14932
92.
KhaminetsA, HeinrichT, MariM, et al.Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum turnover by selective autophagy. Nature, 2015; 522(7556):354–358; doi: 10.1038/nature14498
93.
FumagalliF, NoackJ, BergmannTJ, et al.Translocon component Sec62 acts in endoplasmic reticulum turnover during stress recovery. Nat Cell Biol, 2016; 18(11):1173–1184; doi: 10.1038/ncb3423
94.
BhaskaraRM, GrumatiP, Garcia-PardoJ, et al.Curvature induction and membrane remodeling by FAM134B reticulon homology domain assist selective ER-phagy. Nat Commun, 2019; 10(1):2370; doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10345-3
95.
PalmaA, ReggioA. Signaling regulation of FAM134-dependent ER-phagy in cells. J Cell Physiol, 2025; 240(1):e31492; doi: 10.1002/jcp.31492
96.
BerkaneR, Ho-XuanH, GloggerM, et al.The function of ER-phagy receptors is regulated through phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination pathways. Nat Commun, 2023; 14(1):8364; doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44101-5
97.
JiangX, WangX, DingX, et al.FAM134B oligomerization drives endoplasmic reticulum membrane scission for ER-phagy. Embo J, 2020; 39(5):e102608; doi: 10.15252/embj.2019102608
98.
GonzálezA, Covarrubias-PintoA, BhaskaraRM, et al.Ubiquitination regulates ER-phagy and remodelling of endoplasmic reticulum. Nature, 2023; 618(7964):394–401; doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06089-2
99.
ForondaH, FuY, Covarrubias-PintoA, et al.Heteromeric clusters of ubiquitinated ER-shaping proteins drive ER-phagy. Nature, 2023; 618(7964):402–410; doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06090-9
100.
WangX, JiangX, LiB, et al.A regulatory circuit comprising the CBP and SIRT7 regulates FAM134B-mediated ER-phagy. J Cell Biol, 2023; 222(5):e202201068; doi: 10.1083/jcb.202201068
101.
CinqueL, De LeonibusC, IavazzoM, et al.MiT/TFE factors control ER-phagy via transcriptional regulation of FAM134B. Embo J, 2020; 39(17):e105696; doi: 10.15252/embj.2020105696
102.
De LeonibusC, MaddalunoM, FerrieroR, et al.Sestrin2 drives ER-phagy in response to protein misfolding. Dev Cell, 2024; 59(16):2035–2052.e10; doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2024.07.004
103.
IshiiS, ChinoH, OdeKL, et al.CCPG1 recognizes endoplasmic reticulum luminal proteins for selective ER-phagy. Mol Biol Cell, 2023; 34(4):ar29; doi: 10.1091/mbc.E22-09-0432
104.
DeeganS, SaveljevaS, LogueSE, et al.Deficiency in the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway reveals the toxic potential of autophagy under ER stress conditions. Autophagy, 2014; 10(11):1921–1936; doi: 10.4161/15548627.2014.981790
105.
Di CaraF, SavaryS, KovacsWJ, et al.The peroxisome: An up-and-coming organelle in immunometabolism. Trends Cell Biol, 2023; 33(1):70–86; doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2022.06.001
Grygiel-GórniakB. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and their ligands: Nutritional and clinical implications–a review. Nutr J, 2014; 13:17; doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-17
108.
GermainK, KimPK. Pexophagy: A model for selective autophagy. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21(2):578; doi: 10.3390/ijms21020578
109.
DeosaranE, LarsenKB, HuaR, et al.NBR1 acts as an autophagy receptor for peroxisomes. J Cell Sci, 2013; 126(Pt 4):939–952; doi: 10.1242/jcs.114819
110.
AmmanathanV, VatsS, AbrahamIM, et al.Xenophagy in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol, 2020; 66:163–170; doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.02.015
111.
ThurstonTLM, WandelMP, von MuhlinenN, et al.Galectin 8 targets damaged vesicles for autophagy to defend cells against bacterial invasion. Nature, 2012; 482(7385):414–418; doi: 10.1038/nature10744
112.
ManzanilloPS, AyresJS, WatsonRO, et al.The ubiquitin ligase parkin mediates resistance to intracellular pathogens. Nature, 2013; 501(7468):512–516; doi: 10.1038/nature12566
113.
SunD, WuR, LiP, et al.Phase separation in regulation of aggrephagy. J Mol Biol, 2020; 432(1):160–169; doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.06.026
114.
DikicI. Proteasomal and autophagic degradation systems. Annu Rev Biochem, 2017; 86(1):193–224; doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044908
115.
LamarkT, JohansenT. Aggrephagy: Selective disposal of protein aggregates by macroautophagy. Int J Cell Biol, 2012; 2012(1):736905; doi: 10.1155/2012/736905
116.
LiuX, LiY, WangX, et al.The BEACH-containing protein WDR81 coordinates p62 and LC3C to promote aggrephagy. J Cell Biol, 2017; 216(5):1301–1320; doi: 10.1083/jcb.201608039
117.
KawaguchiY, KovacsJJ, McLaurinA, et al.The deacetylase HDAC6 regulates aggresome formation and cell viability in response to misfolded protein stress. Cell, 2003; 115(6):727–738; doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00939-5
118.
TurcoE, WittM, AbertC, et al.FIP200 claw domain binding to p62 promotes autophagosome formation at ubiquitin condensates. Mol Cell, 2019; 74(2):330–346.e11; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.035
119.
MatsumotoG, ShimogoriT, HattoriN, et al.TBK1 controls autophagosomal engulfment of polyubiquitinated mitochondria through p62/SQSTM1 phosphorylation. Hum Mol Genet, 2015; 24(15):4429–4442; doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv179
120.
Gómez-SintesR, LedesmaMD, BoyaP. Lysosomal cell death mechanisms in aging. Ageing Res Rev, 2016; 32:150–168; doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2016.02.009
121.
PapadopoulosC, KravicB, MeyerH. Repair or lysophagy: Dealing with damaged lysosomes. J Mol Biol, 2020; 432(1):231–239; doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.08.010
122.
KravicB, BehrendsC, MeyerH. Regulation of lysosome integrity and lysophagy by the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2QL1. Autophagy, 2020; 16(1):179–180; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1687217
123.
ChauhanS, KumarS, JainA, et al.TRIMs and galectins globally cooperate and TRIM16 and Galectin-3 co-direct autophagy in endomembrane damage homeostasis. Dev Cell, 2016; 39(1):13–27; doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.08.003
124.
YoshidaY, YasudaS, FujitaT, et al.Ubiquitination of exposed glycoproteins by SCFFBXO27 directs damaged lysosomes for autophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017; 114(32):8574–8579; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702615114
125.
AjoolabadyA, AslkhodapasandhokmabadH, LibbyP, et al.Ferritinophagy and ferroptosis in the management of metabolic diseases. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2021; 32(7):444–462; doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2021.04.010
126.
ManciasJD, Pontano VaitesL, NissimS, et al.Ferritinophagy via NCOA4 is required for erythropoiesis and is regulated by iron dependent HERC2-mediated proteolysis. Elife, 2015; 4:e10308; doi: 10.7554/eLife.10308
127.
GoodwinJM, DowdleWE, DeJesusR, et al.Autophagy-independent lysosomal targeting regulated by ULK1/2-FIP200 and ATG9. Cell Rep, 2017; 20(10):2341–2356; doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.034
ChenX, MiL, GuG, et al.Dysfunctional endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondrion coupling is associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis and neurological deficits in a rodent model of severe head injury. J Neurotrauma, 2022; 39(7–8):560–576; doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0347
130.
JiangR-Q, LiQ-Q, ShengR. Mitochondria associated ER membranes and cerebral ischemia: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Pharmacol Res, 2023; 191:106761; doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106761
131.
MissiroliS, PatergnaniS, CarocciaN, et al.Mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) and inflammation. Cell Death Dis, 2018; 9(3):329; doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0027-2
132.
PereiraAC, De PascaleJ, ResendeR, et al.ER-mitochondria communication is involved in NLRP3 inflammasome activation under stress conditions in the innate immune system. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2022; 79(4):213; doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04211-7
133.
SimmenT, Herrera-CruzMS. Plastic mitochondria-endoplasmic reticulum (ER) contacts use chaperones and tethers to mould their structure and signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2018; 53:61–69; doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.04.014
134.
GreenDR, KroemerG. The pathophysiology of mitochondrial cell death. Science, 2004; 305(5684):626–629; doi: 10.1126/science.1099320
135.
DaskalakiI, GkikasI, TavernarakisN. Hypoxia and selective autophagy in cancer development and therapy. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2018; 6:104; doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00104
136.
GelmettiV, De RosaP, TorosantucciL, et al.PINK1 and BECN1 relocalize at mitochondria-associated membranes during mitophagy and promote ER-mitochondria tethering and autophagosome formation. Autophagy, 2017; 13(4):654–669; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1277309
137.
DiwanA, MatkovichSJ, YuanQ, et al.Endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria crosstalk in NIX-mediated murine cell death. n.d.
138.
ZhangX, YuanY, JiangL, et al.Endoplasmic reticulum stress induced by tunicamycin and thapsigargin protects against transient ischemic brain injury: Involvement of PARK2-dependent mitophagy. Autophagy, 2014; 10(10):1801–1813; doi: 10.4161/auto.32136
139.
B’chirW, MaurinA-C, CarraroV, et al.The eIF2α/ATF4 pathway is essential for stress-induced autophagy gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013; 41(16):7683–7699; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt563
140.
SinghA, KendallSL, CampanellaM. Common traits spark the mitophagy/xenophagy interplay. Front Physiol, 2018; 9:1172; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01172
141.
Anonymous. Lipid droplet turnover at the lysosome inhibits growth of hepatocellular carcinoma in a BNIP3-dependent manner. Science Advances, 2022.
142.
HerkerE, VieyresG, BellerM, et al.Lipid droplet contact sites in health and disease. Trends Cell Biol, 2021; 31(5):345–358; doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2021.01.004
143.
KamolzL-P, HeckerA. Molecular mechanisms related to burns, burn wound healing and scarring. Int J Mol Sci, 2023; 24(10):8785; doi: 10.3390/ijms24108785
144.
YangC, ChenY, HuangH, et al.ROS-eliminating carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel to enhance burn wound-healing efficacy. Front Pharmacol, 2021; 12:679580; doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.679580
145.
XiaoB, GohJ-Y, XiaoL, et al.Reactive oxygen species trigger Parkin/PINK1 pathway-dependent mitophagy by inducing mitochondrial recruitment of Parkin. J Biol Chem, 2017; 292(40):16697–16708; doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.787739
146.
ZhaoW. PINK1/PRKN-dependent mitophagy in the burn injury model. n.d.
147.
DuanC. Drp1 regulates mitochondrial dysfunction and dysregulated metabolism in ischemic injury via Clec16a-, BAX-, and GSH-pathways. 2020.
148.
SongxueG, QuanF, LeileiC, et al.Locally activated mitophagy contributes to a “built-in” protection against early burn-wound progression in rats. Life Sci, 2021; 276:119095.
149.
ZhangW, SirajS, ZhangR, et al.Mitophagy receptor FUNDC1 regulates mitochondrial homeostasis and protects the heart from I/R injury. Autophagy, 2017; 13(6):1080–1081; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1300224
150.
ZhouH, LiD, ZhuP, et al.Melatonin suppresses platelet activation and function against cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury via PPARγ/FUNDC1/mitophagy pathways. J Pineal Res, 2017; 63(4); doi: 10.1111/jpi.12438
151.
ZhangW, MaQ, SirajS, et al.Nix-mediated mitophagy regulates platelet activation and life span. Blood Adv, 2019; 3(15):2342–2354; doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019032334
152.
YuJ, NagasuH, MurakamiT, et al.Inflammasome activation leads to Caspase-1–dependent mitochondrial damage and block of mitophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014; 111(43):15514–15519; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414859111
153.
PatoliD, MignotteF, DeckertV, et al.Inhibition of mitophagy drives macrophage activation and antibacterial defense during sepsis. J Clin Invest, 2020; 130(11):5858–5874; doi: 10.1172/JCI130996
154.
LyuY, WangT, HuangS, et al.Mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns and metabolism in the regulation of innate immunity. J Innate Immun, 2023; 15(1):665–679; doi: 10.1159/000533602
155.
SliterDA, MartinezJ, HaoL, et al.Parkin and PINK1 mitigate STING-induced inflammation. Nature, 2018; 561(7722):258–262; doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0448-9
156.
ZhongW, RaoZ, XuJ, et al.Defective mitophagy in aged macrophages promotes mitochondrial DNA cytosolic leakage to activate STING signaling during liver sterile inflammation. Aging Cell, 2022; 21(6):e13622; doi: 10.1111/acel.13622
157.
Esteban-MartínezL, Sierra-FilardiE, McGrealRS, et al.Programmed mitophagy is essential for the glycolytic switch during cell differentiation. Embo J, 2017; 36(12):1688–1706; doi: 10.15252/embj.201695916
158.
ParkJ-S, ChoiH-S, YimS-Y, et al.Heme Oxygenase-1 protects the liver from septic injury by modulating TLR4-mediated mitochondrial quality control in mice. Shock, 2018; 50(2):209–218; doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001020
159.
HuangL-Y. Gasdermin A is required for epidermal cornification during skin barrier regeneration and in an atopic dermatitis-like model. n.d.
160.
DasDN, NaikPP, MukhopadhyayS, et al.Elimination of dysfunctional mitochondria through mitophagy suppresses benzo[a]pyrene-induced apoptosis. Free Radic Biol Med, 2017; 112:452–463.
161.
GaoZ, HuY, FuH, et al.Dasatinib causes keratinocyte apoptosis via inhibiting high mobility group Box 1-mediated mitophagy. Toxicol Lett, 2023; 373:22–32; doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2022.11.004
162.
FengY, LiL, ZhangQ, et al.Mitophagy associated self-degradation of phosphorylated MAP4 guarantees the migration and proliferation responses of keratinocytes to hypoxia. Cell Death Discov, 2023; 9(1):168; doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01465-3
163.
SimpsonCL, TokitoMK, UppalaR, et al.NIX initiates mitochondrial fragmentation via DRP1 to drive epidermal differentiation. Cell Rep, 2021; 34(5):108689; doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108689
164.
ChevalierFP, RorteauJ, FerraroS, et al.MiR-30a-5p alters epidermal terminal differentiation during aging by regulating BNIP3L/NIX-dependent mitophagy. Cells, 2022; 11(5):836; doi: 10.3390/cells11050836
165.
AwataWMC, AlvesJV, CostaRM, et al.Vascular injury associated with ethanol intake is driven by AT1 receptor and mitochondrial dysfunction. Biomed Pharmacother, 2023; 169:115845; doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115845
166.
XiujinZ, LiliG, JingF, et al.HOXD9 regulated mitophagy to promote endothelial progenitor cells angiogenesis and deep vein thrombosis recanalization and resolution. 2024.
167.
ChenL, HaoL, YanshuoC, et al.Grape seed proanthocyanidins regulate mitophagy of endothelial cells and promote wound healing in mice through p-JNK/FOXO3a/ROS signal pathway. Arch Biochem Biophys, 2023; 749:109790.
168.
KobayashiK, ArayaJ, MinagawaS, et al.Involvement of PARK2-mediated mitophagy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis pathogenesis. J Immunol, 2016; 197(2):504–516; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600265
169.
KuritaY, ArayaJ, MinagawaS, et al.Pirfenidone inhibits myofibroblast differentiation and lung fibrosis development during insufficient mitophagy. Respir Res, 2017; 18(1):114; doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0600-3
170.
WooS-H, MoYJ, LeeY-I, et al.ANT2 accelerates cutaneous wound healing in aged skin by regulating energy homeostasis and inflammation. J Invest Dermatol, 2023; 143(11):2295–2310.e17; doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.05.002
171.
LeeSH, DuJ, StithamJ, et al.Inducing mitophagy in diabetic platelets protects against severe oxidative stress. EMBO Mol Med, 2016; 8(7):779–795; doi: 10.15252/emmm.201506046
172.
WangM, YangD, LiL, et al.A dual role of mesenchymal stem cell derived small extracellular vesicles on TRPC6 protein and mitochondria to promote diabetic wound healing. ACS Nano, 2024; 18(6):4871–4885; doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c09814
173.
AbdullahiA, WangV, AugerC, et al.Catecholamines induce endoplasmic reticulum stress via both alpha and beta receptors. Shock, 2020; 53(4):476–484; doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001394
174.
AndersohnA, GarciaMI, FanY, et al.Aggregated and hyperstable damage-associated molecular patterns are released during ER stress to modulate immune function. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2019; 7:198; doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00198
175.
TangS-C, KoJ-L, LuC-T, et al.Chloroquine alleviates the heat-induced to injure via autophagy and apoptosis mechanisms in skin cell and mouse models. PLoS One, 2022; 17(8):e0272797; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272797
176.
ZhangL, PiipponenM, LiuZ, et al.Human skin specific long noncoding RNA HOXC13-AS regulates epidermal differentiation by interfering with Golgi-ER retrograde transport. Cell Death Differ, 2023; 30(5):1334–1348; doi: 10.1038/s41418-023-01142-z
177.
Bachar-WikstromE, ManchandaM, BansalR, et al.Endoplasmic reticulum stress in human chronic wound healing: Rescue by 4-phenylbutyrate. Int Wound J, 2021; 18(1):49–61; doi: 10.1111/iwj.13525
178.
ZhongC, LiP, ArgadeS, et al.Inhibition of protein glycosylation is a novel pro-angiogenic strategy that acts via activation of stress pathways. Nat Commun, 2020; 11(1):6330; doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20108-0
179.
ZhangC, HuangX, XieB, et al.The multi-protective effect of IL-37-Smad3 against ox-LDL induced dysfunction of endothelial cells. Biomed Pharmacother, 2024; 172:116268; doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116268
180.
CuiS, LiuX, LiuY, et al.Autophagosomes defeat ferroptosis by decreasing generation and increasing discharge of free Fe2+ in skin repair cells to accelerate diabetic wound healing. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2023; 10(25):e2300414; doi: 10.1002/advs.202300414
181.
BuonomoV, LohachovaK, ReggioA, et al.Two FAM134B isoforms differentially regulate ER dynamics during myogenesis. Embo J, 2025; 44(4):1039–1073; doi: 10.1038/s44318-024-00356-2
182.
MaL, HuaL, YuW, et al.TSG-6 inhibits hypertrophic scar fibroblast proliferation by regulating IRE1α/TRAF2/NF-κB signalling. Int Wound J, 2023; 20(4):1008–1019; doi: 10.1111/iwj.13950
183.
HeW, MuX, WuX, et al.The cGAS-STING pathway: A therapeutic target in diabetes and its complications. Burns Trauma, 2024; 12:tkad050; doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkad050
184.
VikramanPP, AminK, MohandasS, et al.Dysregulation of miR-146a is associated with exacerbated inflammation, oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress in the progression of diabetic foot ulcer. Wound Repair Regen, 2024; 32(4):464–474; doi: 10.1111/wrr.13186
185.
YangY, ZhouY, WangY, et al.Exendin-4 regulates endoplasmic reticulum stress to protect endothelial progenitor cells from high-glucose damage. Mol Cell Probes, 2020; 51:101527.
186.
ChuZ, HuangQ, MaK, et al.Novel neutrophil extracellular trap-related mechanisms in diabetic wounds inspire a promising treatment strategy with hypoxia-challenged small extracellular vesicles. Bioact Mater, 2023; 27:257–270.
187.
LosierTT, AkumaM, McKee-MuirOC, et al.AMPK promotes xenophagy through priming of autophagic kinases upon detection of bacterial outer membrane vesicles. Cell Rep, 2019; 26(8):2150–2165.e5; doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.062
188.
ChenG-Y, YangH-J, LuC-H, et al.Simultaneous induction of autophagy and toll-like receptor signaling pathways by graphene oxide. Biomaterials, 2012; 33(27):6559–6569; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.064
189.
WangZ, LiC. Xenophagy in innate immunity_ A battle between host and pathogen. Dev Comp Immunol, 2020; 109:103693.
190.
ZhuY, LiuY, MaY, et al.Macrophage autophagy deficiency-induced CEBPB accumulation alleviates atopic dermatitis via impairing M2 polarization. Cell Rep, 2023; 42(11):113430; doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113430
191.
XuY. A bacterial effector reveals the V-ATPase-ATG16L1 axis that initiates xenophagy. n.d.
192.
WenX, KlionskyDJ. How bacteria can block xenophagy: An insight from Salmonella. Autophagy, 2020; 16(2):193–194. n.d.
193.
LeeYJ, KimJK, JungCH, et al.Chemical modulation of SQSTM1/p62-mediated xenophagy that targets a broad range of pathogenic bacteria. Autophagy, 2022; 18(12):2926–2945; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2054240
194.
ShariqM, QuadirN, AlamA, et al.The exploitation of host autophagy and ubiquitin machinery by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in shaping immune responses and host defense during infection. Autophagy, 2023; 19(1):3–23; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.2021495
195.
GeP. M. tuberculosis PknG manipulates host autophagy flux to promote pathogen intracellular survival. n.d.
196.
LiuM, WeiX, ZhengZ, et al.AMPK activation eliminates senescent cells in diabetic wound by inducing NCOA4 mediated ferritinophagy. Mol Med, 2024; 30(1):63; doi: 10.1186/s10020-024-00825-8
197.
UekiR, LiuL, KashiwagiS, et al.Role of elevated fibrinogen in burn-induced mitochondrial dysfunction: Protective effects of glycyrrhizin. Shock, 2016; 46(4):382–389; doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000602
198.
XingD, LiuL, MartiGP, et al.Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factor in the burn wound. Wound Repair Regen, 2011; 19(2):205–213; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00656.x
199.
ZhaoR, ZhaoX, WangX, et al.Fasting promotes acute hypoxic adaptation by suppressing mTOR-mediated pathways. Cell Death Dis, 2021; 12(11):1045; doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04351-x
200.
LuoX-L, JiangJ-Y, HuangZ, et al.Autophagic regulation of platelet biology. J Cell Physiol, 2019; 234(9):14483–14488; doi: 10.1002/jcp.28243
201.
ZhangW, RenH, XuC, et al.Hypoxic mitophagy regulates mitochondrial quality and platelet activation and determines severity of I/R heart injury. Elife, 2016; 5:e21407; doi: 10.7554/eLife.21407
202.
WalshTG, van den BoschMTJ, LewisKE, et al.Loss of the mitochondrial kinase PINK1 does not alter platelet function. Sci Rep, 2018; 8(1):14377; doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32716-4
203.
FuL, MacKeiganDT, GongQ, et al.Thymic stromal lymphopoietin induces platelet mitophagy and promotes thrombosis in Kawasaki disease. Br J Haematol, 2023; 200(6):776–791; doi: 10.1111/bjh.18531
204.
KapurR. Platelet activation and mitophagy induction by thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is associated with thrombosis in Kawasaki disease. Br J Haematol, 2023; 200(6):689–690; doi: 10.1111/bjh.18555
205.
PanP, ChenJ, XieF, et al.Enhancing Nix‐dependent mitophagy relieves AKI by restricting TREM ‐1‐mediated hyperactivation of inflammasome in platelets. Faseb J, 2023; 37(11):e23239; doi: 10.1096/fj.202202144RRR
206.
RaymondSL, HoldenDC, MiraJC, et al.Microbial recognition and danger signals in sepsis and trauma. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, 2017; 1863(10 Pt B):2564–2573; doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.01.013
207.
KirchnerS, LeiV, MacLeodAS. The cutaneous wound innate immunological microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21(22):8748; doi: 10.3390/ijms21228748
208.
Shapouri-MoghaddamA, MohammadianS, VaziniH, et al.Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease. J Cell Physiol, 2018; 233(9):6425–6440; doi: 10.1002/jcp.26429
209.
LocatiM, CurtaleG, MantovaniA. Diversity, mechanisms, and significance of macrophage plasticity. Annu Rev Pathol, 2020; 15:123–147; doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012718
210.
IpWKE, HoshiN, ShouvalDS, et al.Anti-inflammatory effect of IL-10 mediated by metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Science, 2017; 356(6337):513–519; doi: 10.1126/science.aal3535
211.
LehmannSM, LeubeRE, SchwarzN. Keratin 6a mutations lead to impaired mitochondrial quality control. Br J Dermatol, 2020; 182(3):636–647.
212.
DharSK. UVB-induced inactivation of manganese-containing superoxide dismutase promotes mitophagy via ROS-mediated mTORC2 pathway activation.
213.
LiC, ZhuY, LiuW, et al.Impaired mitophagy causes mitochondrial DNA leakage and STING activation in ultraviolet B-irradiated human keratinocytes HaCaT. Arch Biochem Biophys, 2023; 737:109553; doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2023.109553
214.
RybchynMS. Enhanced repair of UV-induced DNA damage by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 in skin is linked to pathways that control cellular energy.
215.
ZhuY, XiangW, HeS, et al.Collagen I protects human keratinocytes HaCaT against UVB injury via restoring PINK1/parkin-mediated mitophagy. Arch Biochem Biophys, 2024; 753:109905.
216.
ZhangJ, LiL, ZhangQ, et al.Microtubule-associated protein 4 phosphorylation regulates epidermal keratinocyte migration and proliferation. Int J Biol Sci, 2019; 15(9):1962–1976; doi: 10.7150/ijbs.35440
217.
LiuY, ChenL, GongQ, et al.Hypoxia-induced mitophagy regulates proliferation, migration and odontoblastic differentiation of human dental pulp cells through FUN14 domain-containing 1. Int J Mol Med, 2022; 49(5):72; doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2022.5128
218.
AnX, MaX, LiuH, et al.Inhibition of PDGFRβ alleviates endothelial cell apoptotic injury caused by DRP-1 overexpression and mitochondria fusion failure after mitophagy. Cell Death Dis, 2023; 14(11):756; doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-06272-3
WangL, YuanH, LiW, et al.ACSS3 regulates the metabolic homeostasis of epithelial cells and alleviates pulmonary fibrosis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, 2024; 1870(2):166960; doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2023.166960
221.
XuF, HeY, XuA, et al.Triphenyl phosphate induces cardiotoxicity through myocardial fibrosis mediated by apoptosis and mitophagy of cardiomyocyte in mice. Environ Pollut, 2024; 346:123651.
222.
ZhaoY, LiH-X, LuoY, et al.Lycopene mitigates DEHP-induced hepatic mitochondrial quality control disorder via regulating SIRT1/PINK1/mitophagy axis and mitochondrial unfolded protein response. Environ Pollut, 2022; 292(Pt B):118390.
223.
JinL, YuB, LiuG, et al.Mitophagy induced by UMI-77 preserves mitochondrial fitness in renal tubular epithelial cells and alleviates renal fibrosis. Faseb J, 2022; 36(6):e22342; doi: 10.1096/fj.202200199RR
224.
ChipurupalliS, KannanE, TergaonkarV, et al.Hypoxia induced er stress response as an adaptive mechanism in cancer. Int J Mol Sci, 2019; 20(3):749; doi: 10.3390/ijms20030749
225.
ChipurupalliS, GanesanR, MartiniG, et al.Cancer cells adapt FAM134B/BiP mediated ER-phagy to survive hypoxic stress. Cell Death Dis, 2022; 13(4):357; doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04813-w
226.
YoungMM, TakahashiY, KhanO, et al.Autophagosomal membrane serves as platform for intracellular death-inducing signaling complex (iDISC)-mediated caspase-8 activation and apoptosis. J Biol Chem, 2012; 287(15):12455–12468; doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.309104
227.
HiramatsuN, MessahC, HanJ, et al.Translational and posttranslational regulation of XIAP by eIF2α and ATF4 promotes ER stress-induced cell death during the unfolded protein response. Mol Biol Cell, 2014; 25(9):1411–1420; doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-11-0664
228.
Daverkausen-FischerL, PrölsF. The function of the co-chaperone ERdj4 in diverse (patho-)physiological conditions. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2021; 79(1):9; doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-04082-4
229.
ZhuS, LiX, DangB, et al.Lycium Barbarum polysaccharide protects HaCaT cells from PM2.5-induced apoptosis via inhibiting oxidative stress, ER stress and autophagy. Redox Rep, 2022; 27(1):32–44; doi: 10.1080/13510002.2022.2036507
230.
HuangW, ChenJ, XuE, et al.KCNQ1OT1 mediates keratinocyte migration to promote skin wound healing through the miR-200b-3p/SERP1 axis. Burns, 2023; 49(2):415–424; doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.04.011
231.
GuoZ, YuX, ZhaoS, et al.SIRT6 deficiency in endothelial cells exacerbates oxidative stress by enhancing HIF1α accumulation and H3K9 acetylation at the Ero1α promoter. Clin Transl Med, 2023; 13(8):e1377; doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1377
232.
KimS, LeeSE, YiS, et al.Tauroursodeoxycholic acid decreases keloid formation by reducing endoplasmic reticulum stress as implicated in the pathogenesis of keloid. Int J Mol Sci, 2021; 22(19):10765; doi: 10.3390/ijms221910765
233.
DouZ, LiB, WuL, et al.Probiotic-functionalized silk fibroin/sodium alginate scaffolds with endoplasmic reticulum stress-relieving properties for promoted scarless wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2023; 15(5):6297–6311.
234.
ShimizuM, TakeshitaA, TsukamotoT, et al.Tissue-selective, bidirectional regulation of PEX11 and Perilipin genes through a common peroxisome proliferator response element. Mol Cell Biol, 2004; 24(3):1313–1323.
235.
SinhaM, GhoshN, WijesingheDS, et al.Pseudomonas aeruginosa theft biofilm require host lipids of cutaneous wound. Ann Surg, 2023; 277(3):e634–e647; doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005252
236.
PuQ, GuoK, LinP, et al.Bitter receptor TAS2R138 facilitates lipid droplet degradation in neutrophils during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2021; 6(1):210.
237.
LiD, MaH, ShuQ, et al.Arsenite inhibits M2a polarization of macrophages through downregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2022; 450:116142; doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2022.116142
238.
IsaliI, McClellanP, ShankarE, et al.Genipin guides and sustains the polarization of macrophages to the pro-regenerative M2 subtype via activation of the pSTAT6-PPAR-gamma pathway. Acta Biomater, 2021; 131:198–210; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.06.043
239.
LuH. Enhancer polymorphism rs10865710 associated with traumatic sepsis is a regulator of PPARG gene expression. 2019.
240.
WongW, CraneED, ZhangH, et al.Pgc-1α controls epidermal stem cell fate and skin repair by sustaining NAD+ homeostasis during aging. Mol Metab, 2022; 65:101575; doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2022.101575
241.
YangR, ChowdhuryS, ChoudharyV, et al.Keratinocyte aquaporin‐3 expression induced by histone deacetylase inhibitors is mediated in part by peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptors (PPARs).
242.
RahimK. Bacterial contribution in chronicity of wounds.
243.
Szultka-MłyńskaM, JaniszewskaD, PomastowskiP, et al.Identification of bacteria associated with post-operative wounds of patients with the use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry approach. Molecules, 2021; 26(16):5007; doi: 10.3390/molecules26165007
244.
WolcottRD, HansonJD, ReesEJ, et al.Analysis of the chronic wound microbiota of 2,963 patients by 16S rDNA pyrosequencing. Wound Repair Regen, 2016; 24(1):163–174; doi: 10.1111/wrr.12370
245.
ChoiY, BanerjeeA, McNishS, et al.Co-occurrence of anaerobes in human chronic wounds. Microb Ecol, 2019; 77(3):808–820; doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1231-z
246.
JamesGA, SwoggerE, WolcottR, et al.Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen, 2008; 16(1):37–44; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00321.x
247.
DaeschleinG. Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management. Int Wound J, 2013; 10,(Suppl 1):9–14; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12175
248.
SharmaV, VermaS, SeranovaE, et al.Selective autophagy and xenophagy in infection and disease. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2018; 6:147.
249.
KwonDH, SongHK. A structural view of xenophagy, a battle between host and microbes. Mol Cells, 2018; 41(1):27–34; doi: 10.14348/molcells.2018.2274
250.
NozawaT, TohH, IibushiJ, et al.Rab41-mediated ESCRT machinery repairs membrane rupture by a bacterial toxin in xenophagy. Nat Commun, 2023; 14(1):6230.
251.
RiedererE, CangC, RenD. Lysosomal ion channels: What are they good for and are they druggable targets? Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 2023; 63(1):19–41; doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-051921-013755
252.
BohannonKP, HansonPI. ESCRT puts its thumb on the nanoscale: Fixing tiny holes in endolysosomes. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2020; 65:122–130; doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.06.002
253.
NiekampP, ScharteF, SokoyaT, et al.Ca2+-activated sphingomyelin scrambling and turnover mediate ESCRT-independent lysosomal repair. Nat Commun, 2022; 13(1):1875; doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29481-4
254.
YimWW-Y, YamamotoH, MizushimaN. Annexins A1 and A2 are recruited to larger lysosomal injuries independently of ESCRTs to promote repair. FEBS Lett, 2022; 596(8):991–1003; doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14329
WuY, LiJ, ShenZ, et al.Double-pronged antimicrobial agents based on a Donor-π-Acceptor type aggregation-induced emission luminogen. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2022; 61(47):e202212386; doi: 10.1002/anie.202212386
260.
SommerF, TorracaV, XieY, et al.Disruption of Cxcr3 chemotactic signaling alters lysosomal function and renders macrophages more microbicidal. Cell Rep, 2021; 35(2):109000; doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109000
261.
HuangSC-C, EvertsB, IvanovaY, et al.Cell-intrinsic lysosomal lipolysis is essential for alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Immunol, 2014; 15(9):846–855; doi: 10.1038/ni.2956
262.
ZbindenJC, MirhaidariGJM, BlumKM, et al.The lysosomal trafficking regulator is necessary for normal wound healing. Wound Repair Regen, 2022; 30(1):82–99; doi: 10.1111/wrr.12984
263.
TurnerME, CheJ, MirhaidariGJM, et al.The lysosomal trafficking regulator “LYST”: An 80-year traffic jam. Front Immunol, 2024; 15:1404846; doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1404846
264.
ZoanniB, AielloG, Negre-SalvayreA, et al.Lipidome investigation of carnosine effect on nude mice skin to prevent UV-A damage. Int J Mol Sci, 2023; 24(12):10009; doi: 10.3390/ijms241210009
265.
SidossisLS, PorterC, SarafMK, et al.Browning of subcutaneous white adipose tissue in humans after severe adrenergic stress. Cell Metab, 2015; 22(2):219–227; doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.06.022
266.
AbdullahiA, SamadiO, AugerC, et al.Browning of white adipose tissue after a burn injury promotes hepatic steatosis and dysfunction. Cell Death Dis, 2019; 10(12):870; doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2103-2
267.
CastellanosA, HernandezMG, Tomic-CanicM, et al.Multimodal, in situ imaging of ex vivo human skin reveals decrease of cholesterol sulfate in the neoepithelium during acute wound healing. Anal Chem, 2020; 92(1):1386–1394; doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04542
268.
LiuZ-G, HuY-Q, LiK, et al.Pnpla5-knockout rats exhibit reduced expression levels of proteins involved in steroid metabolism and wound healing compared to wild-type rats. BMC Genomics, 2022; 23(1):583; doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08835-8
269.
PlonerC, RauchenwaldT, ConnollyCE, et al.Oxidant therapy improves adipogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells in human wound healing. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2021; 12(1):280; doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02336-3
270.
AshrafAPK, GerkeV. Plasma membrane wound repair is characterized by extensive membrane lipid and protein rearrangements in vascular endothelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res, 2021; 1868(7):118991; doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.118991
271.
SongB, ZhengY, ChiH, et al.Revealing the roles of glycosphingolipid metabolism pathway in the development of keloid: A conjoint analysis of single-cell and machine learning. Front Immunol, 2023; 14:1139775; doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1139775
272.
ArmstrongDG, BoultonAJM, BusSA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med, 2017; 376(24):2367–2375; doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1615439
273.
DecoutA, KatzJD, VenkatramanS, et al.The cGAS-STING pathway as a therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol, 2021; 21(9):548–569; doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00524-z
274.
QiuJ, ShuC, LiX, et al.PAQR3 depletion accelerates diabetic wound healing by promoting angiogenesis through inhibiting STUB1-mediated PPARγ degradation. Laboratory Investigation, 2022; 102(10):1121–1131.
275.
SilvaJC, PittaMGR, PittaIR, et al.New peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist (GQ-11) improves wound healing in diabetic mice. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2019; 8(9):417–428; doi: 10.1089/wound.2018.0911
276.
CamME, YildizS, AleneziH, et al.Evaluation of burst release and sustained release of pioglitazone-loaded fibrous mats on diabetic wound healing: An in vitro and in vivo comparison study. J R Soc Interface, 2020; 17(162):20190712; doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0712
BerberichB, ThrieneK, GretzmeierC, et al.Proteomic profiling of fibroblasts isolated from chronic wounds identifies disease-relevant signaling pathways. J Invest Dermatol, 2020; 140(11):2280–2290.e4; doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.02.040
279.
NakazawaH, IkedaK, ShinozakiS, et al.Burn-induced muscle metabolic derangements and mitochondrial dysfunction are associated with activation of HIF-1α and mTORC1: Role of protein farnesylation. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):6618; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07011-3
280.
HongWX, HuMS, EsquivelM, et al.The role of Hypoxia-inducible factor in wound healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2014; 3(5):390–399; doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0520
281.
BotusanIR, SunkariVG, SavuO, et al.Stabilization of HIF-1alpha is critical to improve wound healing in diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008; 105(49):19426–19431; doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805230105
282.
PrabhakarPK, SinghK, KabraD, et al.Natural SIRT1 modifiers as promising therapeutic agents for improving diabetic wound healing. Phytomedicine, 2020; 76:153252; doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153252
283.
JiangT, LiuT, DengX, et al.Adiponectin ameliorates lung ischemia-reperfusion injury through SIRT1-PINK1 signaling-mediated mitophagy in type 2 diabetic rats. Respir Res, 2021; 22(1):258; doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01855-0
LeeH, KongG, ParkJ, et al.The potential inhibitory effect of ginsenoside Rh2 on mitophagy in UV-irradiated human dermal fibroblasts. J Ginseng Res, 2022; 46(5):646–656; doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2022.02.001
288.
TakahashiD, MoriyamaJ, NakamuraT, et al.AUTACs: Cargo-specific degraders using selective autophagy. Mol Cell, 2019; 76(5):797–810.e10; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.09.009
289.
ZanQ, ZhaoK, LiR, et al.Mitochondria-targetable near-infrared fluorescent probe for visualization of hydrogen peroxide in lung injury, liver injury, and tumor models. Anal Chem, 2024; 96(26):10488–10495.
290.
ZhuangY, JiangS, DengX, et al.Energy metabolism as therapeutic target for aged wound repair by engineered extracellular vesicle. Sci Adv, 2024; 10(15):eadl0372.
291.
RehouS, de Brito MonteiroL, AugerC, et al.Propranolol normalizes metabolomic signatures thereby improving outcomes after burn. Ann Surg, 2023; 278(4):519–529; doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005973
292.
GrandeR, DovizioM, MarconeS, et al.Platelet-derived microparticles from obese individuals: Characterization of number, size, proteomics, and crosstalk with cancer and endothelial cells. Front Pharmacol, 2019; 10:7; doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00007
293.
CastilloK, ValenzuelaV, MatusS, et al.Measurement of autophagy flux in the nervous system in vivo. Cell Death Dis, 2013; 4(11):e917; doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.421
294.
SeranovaE, WardC, ChiparaM, et al.In vitro screening platforms for identifying autophagy modulators in mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol, 2019; 1880:389–428; doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8873-0_26
295.
YazawaR, NishidaY, AoyamaS, et al.Establishment of a system for screening autophagic flux regulators using a modified fluorescent reporter and CRISPR/Cas9. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2019; 516(3):686–692; doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.06.129
296.
DromparisP, PaulinR, SutendraG, et al.Uncoupling protein 2 deficiency mimics the effects of hypoxia and endoplasmic reticulum stress on mitochondria and triggers pseudohypoxic pulmonary vascular remodeling and pulmonary hypertension. Circ Res, 2013; 113(2):126–136; doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.300699
297.
HaoT, YuJ, WuZ, et al.Hypoxia-reprogramed megamitochondrion contacts and engulfs lysosome to mediate mitochondrial self-digestion. Nat Commun, 2023; 14(1):4105; doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39811-9
298.
KocakM, Ezazi ErdiS, JorbaG, et al.Targeting autophagy in disease: Established and new strategies. Autophagy, 2022; 18(3):473–495; doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1936359
