Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-11
Clarifying the Factor Structure of the Mental Health Continuum Short Form in Three Languages: A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach
The Mental Health Continuum Short Form measures both the private and public aspects of overall positive mental health. This study explored the factor structure of English (n = 324), Afrikaans (n = 476), and Setswana (n = 258) versions of the scale among culturally diverse South African students. A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling model displayed superior fit, with the overall scale but not the subscales attaining sufficient reliability. The “social integration” and “social contribution” items appeared to provide a better representation of overall mental health (and psychological well-being for social integration) than the intended social well-being dimension, and the psychological well-being items mainly represented general mental health in the African group. These findings suggest the need for a culturally sensitive clarification of the private to public continuum in the conceptualization and manifestation of eudaimonic well-being. The scale exhibited partial scalar invariance across the groups.
AdamsByron G.Van de VijverFons J. R.De BruinGideon P.2012. “Identity in South Africa: Examining Self-descriptions across Ethnic Groups.”International Journal of Intercultural Relations36:377-88.
BobowikMagdalenaBasabeNekanePáezDarío. 2015. “The Bright Side of Migration: Hedonic, Psychological, and Social Well-being in Immigrants in Spain.”Social Science Research51:189-204.
4.
BrislinRichard W.1973. Cross-cultural Research Methods. New York, NY: John Wiley.
5.
ByrneBarbara M.2012. Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
ByrneBarbara M.Van de VijverFons J. R.2010. “Testing for Measurement and Structural Equivalence in Large-scale Cross-cultural Studies: Addressing the Issue of Nonequivalence.”International Journal of Testing10(2):107-32.
7.
ChenFang Fang. 2007. “Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance.”Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal14(3):464-504.
8.
ChenFang FangJingYimingHayesAdeleLeeJeong M.2013. “Two Concepts or Two Approaches? A Bifactor Analysis of Psychological and Subjective Well-being.”Journal of Happiness Studies14(3):1033-68.
9.
ChenFeinianBollenKenneth A.PaxtonPamelaCurranPatrick J.KirbyJames B.2001. “Improper Solutions in Structural Equation Models: Causes, Consequences, and Strategies.”Sociological Methods & Research29(4):468-508.
De BruinGideon P.Du PlessisGraham A.2015. “Bifactor Analysis of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF).”Psychological Reports116(2):438-46.
12.
DeciEdward L.RyanRichard M.2008. “Self-determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health.”Canadian Psychology49(3):182-85.
13.
Delle FaveAntonellaSoosai-NathanLawrence. 2014. “Meaning as Inter-connectedness: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence.”Journal of Psychology in Africa24(1):53-68.
14.
Delle FaveAntonellaBrdarIngridFreireTeresaVella-BrodrickDianneWissingMarié P.2011. “The Eudaimonic and Hedonic Components of Happiness: Qualitative and Quantitative Findings.”Social Indicators Research100(2):185-207.
EatonLibertyLouwJohann. 2000. “Culture and Self in South Africa: Individualism-collectivism Predictions.”Journal of Social Psychology140(2):210-17.
17.
GallagherMatthew W.LopezShane J.PreacherKristopher J.2009. “The Hierarchical Structure of Well-being.”Journal of Personality77(4):1025-50.
18.
GuoChengTomsonGöranGuoJizhiLiXiangyunKellerChristinaSöderqvistFredrik. 2015. “Psychometric Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) in Chinese Adolescents—A Methodological Study.”Health & Quality of Life Outcomes13:1-9.
19.
HelneT.HirvilammiT.2015. “Wellbeing and Sustainability: A Relational Approach.”Sustainable Development23(3):167-75.
20.
JoshanlooMohsen. 2016a. “A New Look at the Factor Structure of the MHC-SF in Iran and the United States Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.”Journal of Clinical Psychology (7):701-13.
21.
JoshanlooMohsen. 2016b. “Revisiting the Empirical Distinction between Hedonic and Eudaimonic Aspects of Well-being Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.”Journal of Happiness Studies17:2023-36.
22.
JoshanlooMohsenBobowikMagdalenaBasabeNekane. 2016. “Factor Structure of Mental Well-being: Contributions of Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.”Personality and Individual Differences102:107-10.
23.
JoshanlooMohsenJosePaul E.KielpikowskiMagdalena. 2016. “The Value of Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling in Identifying Factor Overlap in the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF): A Study with a New Zealand Sample.”Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9767-4.
JoshanlooMohsenLamersSanne M. A.2016. “Reinvestigation of the Factor Structure of the MHC-SF in the Netherlands: Contributions of Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.”Personality and Individual Differences97:8-12.
26.
JoshanlooMohsenWissingMarié P.KhumaloItumeleng P.LamersSanne M. A.2013. “Measurement Invariance of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) across Three Cultural Groups.”Personality & Individual Differences55(7):755-59.
27.
JovanovićVeljko. 2015. “Structural Validity of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: The Bifactor Model of Emotional, Social and Psychological Well-being.”Personality and Individual Differences75:154-59.
28.
KahnemanD.DienerEdSchwarzN.1999. Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
KaraśDominikaCieciuchJanKeyesCorey L. M.2014. “The Polish Adaptation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF).”Personality and Individual Differences69:104-09.
30.
KeyesCorey L. M.1998. “Social Well-being.”Social Psychology Quarterly61(2):121-40.
31.
KeyesCorey L. M.2002. “The Mental Health Continuum: From Languishing to Flourishing in Life.”Journal of Health & Social Behavior43(2):207-22.
32.
KeyesCorey L. M.2006. “The Subjective Well-being of America’s Youth: Toward a Comprehensive Assessment.”Adolescent and Family Health4(1):3-11.
33.
KeyesCorey L. M.2007. “Promoting and Protecting Mental Health as Flourishing: A Complementary Strategy for Improving National Mental Health.”American Psychologist62(2):95-108.
KeyesCorey L. M.MyersJohn M.KendlerKenneth S.2010. “The Structure of the Genetic and Environmental Influences on Mental Well-being.”American Journal of Public Health100(12):2379-84.
36.
KeyesCorey L. M.WissingMarié P.PotgieterJohan P.TemaneQ. M.Kruge,rAnnamarieVan RooySinette. 2008. “Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-Speaking South Africans.”Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy15(3):181-92.
37.
LamersSanne M. A.GlasCees A. W.WesterhofGerben J.BohlmeijerErnst T.2012. “Longitudinal Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF): Measurement Invariance across Demographics, Physical Illness, and Mental Illness.”European Journal of Psychological Assessment28(4):290-96.
38.
LamersSanne M. A.WesterhofGerben J.BohlmeijerErnst T.ten Klooste,rPeter M.KeyesCorey L. M.2011. “Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-Sf).”Journal of Clinical Psychology67(1):99-110.
39.
LimYoung-Jin. 2014. “Psychometric Characteristics of the Korean Mental Health Continuum-Short Form in an Adolescent Sample.”Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment32(4):356-64.
40.
Machadode Lara WagnerBandeiraDenise Ruschel. 2015. “Positive Mental Health Scale: Validation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form.”Psico-USF20(2):259-74.
41.
MarshHerbert W.MorinAlexandre J. S.ParkerPhilip D.KaurGurvinder. 2014. “Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: An Integration of the Best Features of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis.”Annual Review of Clinical Psychology10:85-110.
42.
MarshHerbert W.MuthenBengtAsparouhovTihomirLüdtkeOliverRobitzschAlexanderMorinAlexandre J. S.TrautweinUlrich. 2009. “Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating CFA and EFA: Application to Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching.”Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal16(3):439-76.
43.
McDonaldRoderick P.1970. “The Theoretical Foundations of Principal Factor Analysis, Canonical Factor Analysis, and Alpha Factor Analysis.”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology23(1):1-21.
44.
MorinAlexandre J. S.ArensA. KatrinMarshHerbert W.2016. “A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework for the Identification of Distinct Sources of Construct-relevant Psychometric Multidimensionality.”Structural Equation Modeling23(1):116-39.
45.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O.1998-2015. Mplus (Version 7.4). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
46.
NunnallyJum C.1978. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
47.
PetrilloGiovannaCaponeVincenzaCasoDanielaKeyesCorey L. M.2015. “The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) as a Measure of Well-being in the Italian Context.”Social Indicators Research121(1):291-312.
48.
ReiseSteven P.2012. “Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.”Multivariate Behavioral Research47(5):667-96.
49.
ReiseSteven P.MooreTyler M.HavilandMark G.2010. “Bifactor Models and Rotations: Exploring the Extent to Which Multidimensional Data Yield Univocal Scale Scores.”Journal of Personality Assessment92(6):544-59.
50.
RyffCarol D.1989a. “Beyond Ponce De Leon and Life Satisfaction: New Directions in Quest of Successful Ageing.”International Journal of Behavioral Development12(1):35-55.
51.
RyffCarol D.1989b. “Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-being.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(6):1069-81.
52.
Sánchez-OlivaDavidMorinAlexandre J. S.TeixeiraPedro J.CarraçaEliana V.PalmeiraAntonio L.SilvaMarlene N.2017. “A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Representation of the Structure of the Basic Psychological Needs at Work Scale.”Journal of Vocational Behavior98:173-87.
53.
SchutteLusildaWissingMarié P.EllisSuria M.2017. “Problematic Factorial Validity of Three Language Versions of the Basic Psychological Needs Scale (BPNS): Why and What Are the Implications?”Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:10.1007/s10902-017-9861-2
54.
StegerMichael F.FrazierPatriciaOishiShigehiroKalerMatthew. 2006. “The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the Presence of and Search for Meaning in Life.”Journal of Counseling Psychology53(1):80-93.
55.
Van de SchootRensLugtigPeterHoxJoop. 2012. “A Checklist for Testing Measurement Invariance.”European Journal of Developmental Psychology9(4):486-92.
56.
Van de VijverFons J. R.LeungKwok. 1997. Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-cultural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
Van de VijverFons J. R.LeungKwok. 2011. “Equivalence and Bias: A Review of Concepts, Models, and Data Analytic Procedures.” Pp. 17-45 in Cross-cultural Research Methods in Psychology, edited by MatsumotoD.van de VijverF. J. R.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
58.
WatermanAlan S.2008. “Reconsidering Happiness: A Eudaimonist’s Perspective.”The Journal of Positive Psychology3(4):234-52.
59.
WestStephen G.TaylorAaron B.WuWei. 2012. “Model Fit and Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.” Pp. 209-31 in Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, edited by HoyleR. H.New York, NY: Guilford Press.
60.
WissingMarié P.2014. “Meaning and Relational Well-being: A Reflection on the State of the Art and a Way Forward.”Journal of Psychology in Africa24(1):183-92.
61.
WissingMarié P.TemaneQ. M.2008. “The Structure of Psychological Well-being in Cultural Context: Towards a Hierarchical Model of Psychological Health.”Journal of Psychology in Africa18(1):45-55.
62.
WongPaul T. P.2011. “Positive Psychology 2.0: Towards a Balanced Interactive Model of the Good Life.”Canadian Psychology52(2):69-81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
