Family-school-community partnerships are critical to advancing student achievement and equity. School counselors play a central role in fostering these relationships, yet traditional engagement practices often depend on in-person participation, unintentionally excluding families facing cultural, linguistic, or logistical barriers. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the importance of technology in sustaining partnerships, creating both new opportunities and new challenges for equity.
Objectives
This conceptual work introduces the Technology-Informed Partnership (TIP) Model, designed to guide school counselors in integrating technology into family-school-community collaboration and advocacy. The TIP Model builds upon existing frameworks of partnerships and equity-focused counseling by positioning technology as a central lever for inclusive practice.
Conceptual Framework
Grounded in Epstein’s six domains of involvement and informed by advocacy scholarship, the TIP Model is organized around three pillars: Technology as Access, Relationship-Building, and Advocacy. These pillars are applied across key areas of engagement—parenting, communicating, volunteering, learning at home, decision-making, and community collaboration—to provide school counselors with a structured approach for equitable, tech-informed practice.
Conclusions and Implications
The TIP Model reconceptualizes family engagement as digitally mediated and equity-centered. It offers school counselors actionable strategies such as multilingual digital platforms, virtual volunteering, AI-enabled surveys, and culturally responsive communication while addressing ethical considerations, including privacy, equity of access, and algorithmic bias. The TIP Model positions school counselors as leaders in leveraging technology to strengthen inclusive, trust-based partnerships and to advocate for equitable outcomes in an increasingly digital educational landscape.
Ackah-JnrF. R.AppiahJ.KwaoA. (2020). Inclusive language as a pedagogical and motivational tool in early childhood settings: Some observations. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8(09), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.89012
2.
Addi-RaccahA. (2024). The role of digital capital in parental engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 16901–16928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12455-y
3.
AlfeirN. M. (2024). Dimensions of artificial intelligence on family communication. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 1398960. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1398960
4.
AlmuhannaM. A. (2024). Teachers’ perspectives of integrating AI-powered technologies in K-12 education for creating customized learning materials and resources. Education and Information Technologies, 30(8), 10343–10371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13257-y
American School Counselor Association. (2019). ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (4th ed.). American School Counselor Association.
7.
AtkinsR.OglesbyA. (2018). Interrupting racism: Equity and social justice in school counseling. Routledge.
BreitensteinS. M.FoggL.OcampoE. V.AcostaD. I.GrossD. (2016). Parent use and efficacy of a self-administered, tablet-based parent training intervention: A randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(2), Article e36. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5202
10.
BryanJ.HenryL. (2012). A model for building school-family-community partnerships: Principles and process. Journal of Counseling and Development, 90(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2012.00052.x
11.
BryanJ.WilliamsJ. M.GriffinD. (2020). Fostering educational resilience and opportunities in urban schools through equity-focused school–family–community partnerships. Professional School Counseling, 23(1_part_2), 2156759X19899179. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X19899179
12.
BurbulesN. C. (2016). How we use and are used by social media in education. Educational Theory, 66(4), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12188
CaryA. O. (2006). How strong communication contributes to student and school success: Parent and family involvement: The National School Public Relations Association. https://goo.gl/Dd7AX3
15.
ComerJ. S.FurrJ. M.MiguelE. M.Cooper-VinceC. E.CarpenterA. L.ElkinsR. M.KernsC. E.CornacchioD.ChouT.CoxeS.DeSerisyM.SanchezA. L.GolikA.MartinJ.MyersK. M.ChaseR. (2017). Remotely delivering real-time parent training to the home: An initial randomized trial of internet-delivered parent–child interaction therapy (I-PCIT). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(9), 909–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000230
16.
CorralejoS. M.Domenech RodríguezM. M. (2018). Technology in parenting programs: A systematic review of existing interventions. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(9), 2717–2731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1117-1
17.
CrandallK. (2024). Exploring an AI chatbot to close school counselor information gaps: A design science approach. (Publication No. 476) [Doctoral dissertation, Dakota State University]. DSU Institutional Repository. https://scholar.dsu.edu/theses/476/
18.
CrawfordE. R.AguayoD.ValleF. (2019). Counselors as leaders who advocate for undocumented students’ education. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 14(2), 119–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775117739301
19.
CromptonH.JonesM. V.BurkeD. (2022). Affordances and challenges of artificial intelligence in K-12 education: A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 56(3), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2121344
20.
CroninS.OhrtmanM.ColtonE.CrouseB.DepuydtJ.MerwinC.RinnM. (2018). School counselor technology use and school-family-community partnerships. Journal of School Counseling, 16(6), 2018. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1182114
21.
Currie-RubinR. J.SmithS. J. (2014). Understanding the roles of families in virtual learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(5), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914530101
22.
Dotson-BlakeK. P.FosterV. A.GressardC. F. (2009). Ending the silence of the Mexican immigrant voice in public education: Creating culturally inclusive family-school- community partnerships. Professional School Counseling, 12(3), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.5330/PSC.n.2010-12.230
23.
EnebrinkP.HögströmJ.ForsterM.GhaderiA. (2012). Internet-based parent management training: A randomized controlled study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(4), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.01.006
24.
EntenbergG. A.MizrahiS.WalkerH.AghakhaniS.MostovoyK.CarreN.MarshallZ.DosovitskyG.BenficaD.RousseauA.LinG.BungeE. L. (2023). AI-based chatbot micro-intervention for parents: Meaningful engagement, learning, and efficacy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1080770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1080770
25.
EpsteinJ. L. (2010). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Westview Press.
26.
EpsteinJ. L. (2019). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (4th ed.). Westview Press.
27.
EpsteinJ. L.SandersM. G.SheldonS. B.SimonB. S.SalinasK. C.JansornN. R.Van VoorhisF. L. (2021). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (4th ed.). Westview Press.
28.
EpsteinJ. L.SandersM. G.SheldonS. B.SimonB. S.SalinasK. C.JansornN. R.VoorhisVWilliamsK. J. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. Corwin Press.
29.
EpsteinJ. L.SheldonS. B. (2006). Moving forward: Ideas for research on school, family, and community partnerships. In The Sage handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 117–138). Sage Publications, Inc.
30.
FieldJ. E.BakerS. (2004). Defining and examining school counselor advocacy. Professional School Counseling, 8(1), 56–63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42732415
31.
FloreanI. S.DobreanA.PăsăreluC. R.GeorgescuR. D.MileaI. (2020). The efficacy of internet-based parenting programs for children and adolescents with behaviour problems: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 23(4), 510–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-020-00326-0
32.
Flujas-ContrerasJ. M.García-PalaciosA.GómezI. (2019). Technology-based parenting interventions for children’s physical and psychological health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 49(11), 1787–1798. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719000692
33.
GanaprakasamC.ChanthiranM.HashimH. (2024). Integrating AI into Malaysian school counselling: A study on opportunities, challenges, and ethics. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 14(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol14.2.1.2024
34.
GarzaA. N.RenzulliL.DominaT.KearneyC. (2025). Remote school parenting: Assessing home-school contexts and parent practices aimed at engaging children in Learning. Social Currents, 12(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965251338468
35.
GhaderiA.KadesjöC.BjörnsdotterA.EnebrinkP. (2018). Randomized effectiveness trial of the family check-up versus Internet-delivered parent training (iComet) for families of children with conduct problems. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29550-z
36.
GreenidgeT.Smith-AdcockS.CakmakciH.SuY.-W. (2023). A transcendental phenomenology of school counselors’ lived experiences transforming remote counseling services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Professional School Counseling, 27(1), 2156759X231161524. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X231161524
37.
GretzelU.KangM.LeeW. (2008). Differences in consumer-generated media adoption and use: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 17(1-2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10507050801978240
38.
GriffinD.FarrisA. (2010). School counselors and collaboration: Finding resources through community asset mapping. Professional School Counseling, 13(5), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X1001300501
GrimesL. E.HaskinsN.PaisleyP. O. (2013). “So I went out there”: A phenomenological study on the experiences of rural school counselor social justice advocates. Professional School Counseling, 17(1), 2156759X0001700107. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0001700107
41.
HabichtJ.ViswanathanS.CarringtonB.HauserT. U.HarperR.RollwageM. (2024). Closing the accessibility gap to mental health treatment with a personalized self-referral chatbot. Nature Medicine, 30(2), 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02766-x
42.
HarringtonL.AdjrahY.AllenA.Cancel-RomanA.DewK.FeatherJ.Rosalie HaleMLeeCee JonesAPowersM.KnightG.Kroll-SmithS.PersonJ. (2022). Building community in virtual space: A community collaborative sustains its exploration of environmental justice and migration sssues in the midst of COVID- 19. Human Organization, 81(3), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.17730/1938-3525-81.3.280
43.
HooperJ. W. (2020). An exploration of perceptions of how school-home communication leads to parental involvement in a rural high school. Doctoral dissertation, [University of Alabama]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
44.
Hoover-DempseyK. V.SandlerH. M. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference?Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 97(2), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819509700202
45.
Hoover-DempseyK. V.SandlerH. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education?Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001003
46.
HouI.ManO.HamiltonK.MuthusekaranS.JohnykuttyJ.ZadehL.MacNeilS. (2025). “All roads lead to ChatGPT”: How generative AI is eroding social interactions and student learning communities. arXiv preprint arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09779
47.
HowardE. L. (2023). Professional School Counselor Technology use for communication during COVID-19. In: Reimagining education: Studies and stories for effective learning in an evolving digital environment (pp. 133–147): Springer International Publishing.
48.
JeynesW. H. (2018). A practical model for school leaders to encourage parental involvement and parental engagement. School Leadership & Management, 38(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1434767
49.
KhanN.RanadeP.VermaI. K. (2024). Revitalising volunteerism: The transformative influence of artificial intelligence in volunteer management. In BansalJ. C.BorahS.HussainS.SalhiS. (Eds.), Computing and machine learning (1108, pp. 61–73). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6588-1_5
50.
LachanceE. L. (2021). COVID-19 and its impact on volunteering: Moving towards virtual volunteering. Leisure Sciences, 43(1-2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1773990
51.
LimbergD.VillaresE.GonzalesS.StarrettA.RosenN. (2022). An investigation of how school counselors adapted their delivery due to COVID-induced disparities. Professional School Counseling, 26(1b), 2156759X221105797. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X221105797
52.
LiuH. K.HarrisonY. D.LaiJ. K.ChikotoG. L.Jones-LungoK. (2016). Online and virtual volunteering. In: SmithD. H.StebbonsR. A.GrotzJ. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of volunteering, civic participation, and nonprofit associations (pp. 290–310). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26317-9
53.
LowryP. B.CaoJ.EverardA. (2011). Privacy concerns versus desire for interpersonal awareness in driving the use of self-disclosure technologies: The case of instant messaging in two cultures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(4), 163–200. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270406
54.
MajjateH.BellarhmouchY.JeghalA.YahyaouyA.TairiH.ZidaniK. A. (2023). AI-powered academic guidance and counseling system based on student profile and interests. Applied System Innovation, 7(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7010006
55.
Martinez-CosioM. (2010). Parents’ roles in mediating and buffering the implementation of an urban school reform. Education and Urban Society, 42(3), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124509356665
56.
MasonE. C.GriffithC.BelserC. T. (2019). School counselors’ use of technology for program management. Professional School Counseling, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X19870794
MurrayB.DominaT.PettsA.RenzulliL.BoylanR. (2020). “We’re in this together”: Bridging and bonding social capital in elementary school PTOs. American Educational Research Journal, 57(5), 2210–2244. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220908848
59.
NataleK.LubniewskiK. (2018). Use of communication and technology among educational professionals and families. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 10(3), 377–384. Retrieved from. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/418
PopeniciS. A. D.KerrS. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
62.
PretoriusC.ChambersD.CoyleD. (2019). Young people’s online help-seeking and mental health difficulties: Systematic narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(11), Article e13873. https://doi.org/10.2196/13873
RobertsA.Goodman-ScottE.EdirmanasingheN. (2023). The experiences of school counselors providing virtual services during COVID-19: A phenomenological investigation. Professional School Counseling, 27(1), 2156759X231199738. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X231199738
65.
ŞadS. N.KoncaA. S.ÖzerN.AcarF. (2016). Parental e-nvolvement: Phenomenological research on electronic parental involvement. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 11(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/22040552.2016.1227255
66.
SandersM. R.BakerS.TurnerK. M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of triple P online with parents of children with early-onset conduct problems. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(11), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.07.004
ShenJ.ChenJ. K.FindlaterL.SmithG. D. (2025). eaSEL: Promoting social-emotional learning and parent-child interaction through AI-mediated content consumption. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17819. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.17819
69.
ShoreJ. H.AldagM.McVeighF. L.HooverR. L.CiullaR.FisherA. (2014). Review of mobile health technology for military mental health. Military Medicine, 179(8), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00429
70.
SteeleT.NuckolsG.StoneC. (2020). Technology trends in school counseling. Journal of School Counseling, 18(10), 1–30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1251792
71.
SteeleT. M.JacokesD. E.StoneC. B. (2015). An examination of the role of online technology in school counseling. Professional School Counseling, 18(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0001800118
72.
StifelS. W.BrownJ. A.JimersonS. R.DowdyE. (2013). Integrating email communication with counseling at school. School Mental Health, 5(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-012-9086-9
73.
SuS.-W.HungC.-H.ChenL.-X.YuanS.-M. (2024). Development of an AI-based system to enhance school counseling models for Asian elementary students with emotional disorders. IEEE Access, 12(2), 159121–159136. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3483456
74.
SwankJ. M.TysonL. (2012). School counseling site supervisor training: A web-based approach. Professional School Counseling, 16(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X1201600105
75.
TrustyJ.BrownD. (2005). Advocacy competencies for professional school counselors (pp. 259–265). Professional School Counseling. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42732467
76.
WeisenmullerC.HiltonD. (2021). Barriers to access, implementation, and utilization of parenting interventions: Considerations for research and clinical applications. American Psychologist, 76(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000613
WoodhouseH.PasseyD.AndersonJ. (2024). Using digital technologies to build connections between families and schools as children transition to school. Education Sciences, 14(5), 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050520
79.
YıldızN. (2021). School counselors’ leadership role in creating a collaborative school climate for linguistically diverse students. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(6), 67. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n6p7
80.
YuanZ.ChengX.DuanY. (2024). Impact of media dependence: How emotional interactions between users and chat robots affect human socialization?Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1388860. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1388860
81.
YunikeY.RehanaR.MisinemM.KusumawatyI. (2023). The implications of utilizing artificial intelligence-based parenting technology on children’s mental health: A literature review. Poltekita: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 17(3), 1083–1099. https://doi.org/10.33860/jik.v17i3.2958
82.
ZhaiC.WibowoS.LiL. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
83.
ZhangQ.HatcherA. (2011). Cross-cultural comparison of blog use for parent-teacher communication in elementary schools. Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: 9th International Conference, EPCE 2011, held as part of HCI International 2011, Orlando, FL, USA, July 9-14, 2011. Proceedings, 9, 263–272.
