Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This qualitative study investigated the perceptions of 10 high school counselors who worked with students identified both as having autism spectrum disorder and as academically gifted, operationally defined as 2eASD. Using thematic analysis, we conducted individual interviews to develop an understanding of the counselors’ perceptions of their roles and successful practices in working with 2eASD students. School counselors reported using various differentiated, research-based practices with students identified as 2eASD. These strength-based and individualized counseling practices included opportunities for these students to participate in advanced classes and interest-based activities. Each of the school counselors recommended, for example, participation in extra-curricular activities and provided various broad types of social and emotional support. Half of the school counselors suggested applications to local, less competitive colleges for these capable students. The sample of school counselors often described their use of Multi-Tiered System of Supports, including Tier 2 targeted and Tier 3 individualized supports, grounded in the American School Counselor Association National Model. We conclude this article by discussing these findings and providing implications for school counselors working with this population of students in the future.

Keywords

autism spectrum disorder (ASD)post-secondary planning school counselors strengths based approach twice-exceptional

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

J. L.

Ayres

K. M.

Smith

K. A.

(2015). Training teachers in evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A review of the literature. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414544551

American School Counselor Association . (2021). The school counselor and multitiered systems of supports. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Standards-Positions/Position-Statements/ASCA-Position-Statements/The-School-Counselor-and-Multitiered-System-of-Sup

American School Counselor Association . (2023a). The school counselor and social/emotional development. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Standards-Positions/Position-Statements/ASCA-Position-Statements/The-School-Counselor-and-Social-Emotional-Developm

American Psychiatric Association . (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5-TR®). American Psychiatric Association.

Americans with Disabilities Act . (1990). Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-104/pdf/STATUTE-104-Pg327.pdf

American School Counselor Association . (2019). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (4th ed.). ASCA.

American School Counselor Association . (2022). The school counselor and students with disabilities. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Standards-Positions/Position-Statements/ASCA-Position-Statements/The-School-Counselor-and-Students-with-Disabilities

American School Counselor Association . (2023b). The school counselor and academic development. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Standards-Positions/Position-Statements/ASCA-Position-Statements/The-School-Counselor-and-Academic-Development#:∼:text=ASCA_Position,%2C_and_social%2Femotional_development

American School Counselor Association . (2024a).The school counselor and appraisal and advisement for postsecondary preparation. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Standards-Positions/Position-Statements/ASCA-Position-Statements/The-School-Counselor-and-Individual-Student-Planni

10.

American School Counselor Association . (2024b). The school counselor and career development. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Standards-Positions/Position-Statements/ASCA-Position-Statements/The-School-Counselor-and-Career-Development

11.

American School Counselor Association . (2024c). The school counselor and Section 504 plan and process. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Standards-Positions/Position-Statements/ASCA-Position-Statements/The-School-Counselor-and-Section-504-Plan-and-Proc

12.

Anderson

A. H.

Carter

Stephenson

(2018). Perspectives of university students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(3), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3257-3

13.

Assouline

S. G.

Foley-Nicpon

Dockery

(2012). Predicting the academic achievement of gifted students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(9), 1781–1789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1403-x

14.

Auger

R. W.

(2013). Autism spectrum disorders: A research review for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 16(4), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.5330/PSC.n.2013-16.256

15.

Baio

Wiggins

Christensen

D. L.

Maenner

M. J.

Daniels

Warren

Kurzius-Spencer

Zahorodny

Robinson Rosenberg

White

Durkin

M. S.

Imm

Nikolaou

Yeargin-Allsopp

Lee

L. C.

Harrington

Lopez

Fitzgerald

R. T.

Hewitt

Dowling

N. F.

(2018). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 sites, United States, 2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report - Surveillance Summaries, 67(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6706a1

16.

Barna

Nice

(2021). The school counselor’s role in supporting students with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder with the transition to college. Journal of School Counseling, 19(36), 1–36. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1328940.pdf

17.

Barnhill

G. P.

(2016). Supporting students with asperger syndrome on college campuses: Current practices. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 31(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614523121

18.

Baxter

Jack

(2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf

19.

Botha

Gillespie-Lynch

(2022). Come as you are: Examining autistic identity development and the neurodiversity movement through an intersectional lens. Human Development, 66(2), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1159/000524123

20.

Braun

Clarke

(2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846

21.

Brod

Tesler

L. E.

Christensen

T. L.

(2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9

22.

Callahan

C. M.

(2009). Myth 3: A family of identification myths: Your sample must be the same as the population. There is a “silver bullet” in identification. There must be “winners” and “losers” in identification and programming. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 239–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346826

23.

Christensen

D. L.

Bilder

D. A.

Zahorodny

Pettygrove

Durkin

M. S.

Fitzgerald

R. T.

Rice

Kurzius-Spencer

Baio

Yeargin-Allsopp

(2016). Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among 4-year-old children in the autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 37(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000235

24.

Creswell

J. W.

(2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

25.

Creswell

J. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

26.

Drake

(2014). College experience of academically successful students with autism. Journal of Autism, 1(5), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.7243/2054-992X-1-5

27.

Foley-Nicpon

Allmon

Sieck

Stinson

R. D.

(2011). Empirical investigation of twice-exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210382575

28.

Francis

J. J.

Johnston

Robertson

Glidewell

Entwistle

Eccles

M. P.

Grimshaw

J. M.

(2009). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25(10), 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015

29.

Gelbar

N. W.

Cascio

A. A.

Madaus

J. W.

Reis

S. M.

(2021). A systematic review of the research on gifted individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(4), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211061876

30.

Goodman-Scott

Betters-Bubon

Olsen

Donohue

(2020). Making MTSS work. American School Counselor Association.

31.

Goodman-Scott

Carlisle

(2014). School counselors’ roles in creating and implementing social stories to serve students with autism spectrum disorder. Professional School Counseling, 18(1), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0001800108

32.

Goodman-Scott

Carlisle

Clark

Burgess

(2016). “A powerful tool”: A phenomenological study of school counselors’ experiences with social stories. Professional School Counseling, 20(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.5330/1096-2409-20.1.25

33.

Goodman-Scott

Cholewa

(2023). Research design: Qualitative approaches. In Zyromski

Dimmitt

(Eds.), School counseling research: Advancing the professional evidence base (pp. 192–236). Oxford University Press.

34.

Gurbuz

Hanley

Riby

D. M.

(2019). University students with autism: The social and academic experiences of university in the UK. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(2), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3741-4

35.

Hsieh

H. F.

Shannon

S. E.

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

36.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title20/pdf/USCODE-2011-title20-chap33-subchapI-sec1400.pdf

37.

Lombardi

A. R.

Rifenbark

G. G.

Hicks

Taconet

Challenger

(2022). College and career readiness support for youth with and without disabilities based on the national longitudinal transition study 2012. Exceptional Children, 89(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221088940

38.

Madaus

J. W.

Shaw

S. F.

(2008). The role of school professionals in implementing section 504 for students with disabilities. Educational Policy, 22(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807307069

39.

Malterud

Siersma

V. D.

Guassora

A. D.

(2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

40.

Marder

deBettencourt

L. U.

(2015). Teaching students with ASD using evidence-based practices: Why is training critical now? Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 38(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414565838

41.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

42.

National Center for Education Statistics . (2022). Undergraduate graduation rates (fast facts). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=40

43.

Novak

Oehrtman

J. P.

Vostal

(2024). School counselors’ role in supporting college and career readiness: Does disability status matter? Professional School Counseling, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X231225237

44.

Osborn

Costas

(2013). Role-playing in counselor student development. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 8(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2013.763689

45.

Proudfoot

(2023). Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816

46.

Reis

Gelbar

Madaus

(2022). Pathways to academic success: Specific strength-based teaching and support strategies for twice exceptional high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Gifted Education International, 39(3), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294221124197

47.

Reis

S. M.

Baum

S. M.

Burke

(2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976

48.

Reis

S. M.

Gelbar

N. W.

Madaus

J. W.

(2021). Understanding the academic success of academically talented college students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(10), 4426–4439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05290-4

49.

Reis

S. M.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2009). Myth 1: The gifted and talented constitute one single homogeneous group and giftedness is a way of being that stays in the person over time and experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346824

50.

Reis

S. M.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2020). Intellectual giftedness. In Sternberg

R. J.

Kaufman

S. B.

(Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

51.

Renzulli

S. J.

Gelbar

(2019). Leadership roles for school counselors in identifying and supporting twice-exceptional (2E) students. Professional School Counseling, 23(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X20940636

52.

Renzulli

S. J.

Gelbar

N. W.

(2023). The neurodiversity paradigm and the future of higher education. In Madaus

J. W.

DukesIII

L. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of higher education and disability (pp. 189–200). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204056.00024

53.

Rinn

A. N.

Mun

R. U.

Hodges

(2022). 2020-2021 State of the states in gifted education. National Association for Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted.

54.

Robinson

(2005). In defense of a psychometric approach to the definition of academic giftedness. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 280–294). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.016

55.

Singer

(2016). Neurodiversity: The birth of an idea. Kindle.

56.

Stake

(2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford.

57.

Sternberg

R. J.

Ambrose

(Eds.), (2021). Conceptions of giftedness and talent. Palgrave.

58.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2012). A proposed direction forward for gifted education based on psychological science. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212456079

59.

Terry

Hayfield

Clarke

Braun

(2017). Thematic analysis. In Willig

Stainton Rogers

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 17–37). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2

School Counselors’ Practices that Enable Academically Talented High School Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder to Achieve

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References