Collegial, competent, and consultative supervision is a practical, innovative approach to peer supervision for practicing school counselors. This integrative approach is inspired by Cheston’s Ways Paradigm framework, uses the Ronnestad and Skovholt model of counselor development, and is supported by empirical studies about peer consultation and supervision. This article suggests strategies for practicing school counselors to engage in peer supervision in collegial, competent, and consultative ways. It addresses limitations, implications, and future research directions.
AgnewT.VaughtC. C.GetzH. G.FortuneJ. (2000). Peer group clinical supervision program fosters confidence and professionalism. Professional School Counseling, 4(1), 6–12. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ629039
2.
American School Counselor Association. (2019a). ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (4th ed.).
BenshoffJ. M.PaisleyP. O. (1996). The structured peer consultation model for school counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74(2), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb01872.x
7.
BledsoeK. G.Logan-McKibbenS.McKibbenW. B.CookR. M. (2019). A content analysis of school counseling supervision. Professional School Counseling, 22(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X19838454
BordersL. D.BrownL. L. (2005). The new handbook of counseling supervision. Routledge.
10.
ChestonS. E. (2000). Counselor preparation: A new paradigm for teaching counseling theory and practice. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39(4), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2000.tb01236.x
CrutchfieldL. B.BordersL. D. (1997). Impact of two clinical peer supervision models on practicing school counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 75(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1997.tb02336.x
14.
Day-VinesN. L.WoodS. M.GrothausT.CraigenL.HolmanA.Dotson-BlakeK.DouglassM. J. (2007). Broaching the subjects of race, ethnicity, and culture during the counseling process. Journal of Counseling & Development, 85(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2007.tb00608.x
15.
DollarhideC. T.MillerG. M. (2006). Supervision for preparation and practice of school counselors: Pathways to excellence. Counselor Education and Supervision, 45(4), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2006.tb00001.x
GranelloD. H. (2010). Cognitive complexity among practicing counselors: How thinking changes with experience. Journal of Counseling and Development, 88(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00155.x
18.
HeinS. F.LawsonG. (2009). A qualitative examination of supervisors’ experiences of the process of triadic supervision. Clinical Supervisor, 28(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325220902832630
19.
HeinS. F.LawsonG.RodriguezC. P. (2013). Supervisee incompatibility and its influence on supervisee and supervisor outcomes in triadic supervision: An investigation of supervisors’ perspectives. Clinical Supervisor, 32(2), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2013.851634
20.
HerlihyB.GrayN.McCollumV. (2002). Special issue: Legal and ethical issues in school counselor supervision. Professional School Counseling, 6(1), 55–60. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ655211
21.
HessS. A.KrausK. L. (2010). Supervision-based integrative models of counselor supervision: Interpersonal models. In LadanyN.BradleyL. J. (Eds.), Counselor supervision (4th ed., pp. 125–143). Routledge.
JohnsonW. B.SkinnerC. J.KaslowN. J. (2014). Relational mentoring in clinical supervision: The transformational supervisor. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(11), 1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22128
24.
JonesC. T.WelfareL. E.MelchiorS.CashR. (2019). Broaching as a strategy for intercultural understanding in clinical supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 38(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2018.1560384
25.
KingK. M. (2021). “I want to, but how?” Defining counselor broaching in core tenets and debated components. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 49(2), 87–100. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmcd.12208
26.
LawsonG.HeinS. F.StuartC. L. (2009). A qualitative investigation of supervisees’ experiences of triadic supervision. Journal of Counseling & Development, 87(4), 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2009.tb00129.x
27.
LintonJ. M.DeuschleC. J. (2006). Meeting school counselors’ supervision needs: Four models of group supervision. Journal of School Counseling, 4(6), 1–27. http://jsc.montana.edu/articles/v4n6.pdf
28.
LukeM.BernardJ. M. (2006). The school counseling supervision model: An extension of the discrimination model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 45(4), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2006.tb00004.x
29.
MagnusonS.NoremK.BradleyL. J. (2001). Supervising school counselors. In BradleyL. J.LadanyN. (Eds.), Counselor supervision: Principles, process, and practices (pp. 207–221). Brunner-Routledge.
30.
MullenP. R.BackerA.ChaeN.LiH. (2020). School counselors’ work-related rumination as a predictor of burnout, turnover intentions, job satisfaction, and work engagement. Professional School Counseling, 24(1), 2156759X20957253. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X20957253
31.
O’ShaughnessyT.MoriY.KaduvettoorA.BeverlyC.WeatherfordR. D. (2010). Counseling and psychotherapy-based models of counselor supervision. In LadanyN.BradleyL. J. (Eds.), Counselor supervision (4th ed., pp. 167–193). Routledge.
Perera-DiltzD. M.MasonK. L. (2012). A national survey of school counselor supervision practices: Administrative, clinical, peer, and technology mediated supervision. Journal of School Counseling, 10(4), 1–34. http://jsc.montana.edu/articles/v10n4.pdf
34.
RonnestadM. H.SkovholtT. M. (2003). The journey of the counselor and therapist: Research findings and perspectives on professional development. Journal of Career Development, 30(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/089484530303000102
35.
RonnestadM. H.SkovholtT. M. (2013). The developing practitioner: Growth and stagnation of therapists and counselors. Routledge.
SomervilleW.MarcusS.ChangD. F. (2019). Multicultural competence-focused peer supervision: A multiple case study of clinical counseling psychology trainees. Journal of Multicultural Counseling & Development, 47(4), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12158
38.
StarlingP. V.BakerS. B. (2000). Structured peer group practicum supervision: Supervisees' perceptions of supervision theory. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39(3), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2000.tb01229.x
39.
StoltenbergC. (1981). Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: The counselor complexity model. Journal of Counseling Psychologists, 28(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.28.1.59
40.
StuderJ. R. (2006). Erik Erikson’s psychosocial stages applied to supervision. Guidance & Counseling, 21(3), 168–173.
41.
TangA. (2020). The impact of school counseling supervision on practicing school counselors’ self-efficacy in building a comprehensive school counseling program. Professional School Counseling, 23(1), 2156759X20947723. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X20947723
WalkerJ. A. (2010). Supervision techniques. In LadanyN.BradleyL. J. (Eds.), Counselor supervision (4th ed., pp. 97–122). Routledge.
44.
WilkersonK. (2006). Peer supervision for the professional development of school counselors: Toward an understanding of terms and findings. Counselor Education and Supervision, 46(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2006.tb00012.x
