To explore the impact of the True Goals (TG) school counseling curriculum on important constructs related to school success for students, we conducted two studies: one with elementary and middle school students and the other with high school students. In this, the first of the two studies, 43 students in Grades 4 through 7 participated in the intervention delivered by two school counselor trainees, across two schools in one school district in the Southwest region of the United States. The study used a waitlist control design with a randomized assignment to intervention and control groups to assess the impact of the TG small-group intervention on (a) students’ goal-setting skills; (b) students’ academic self-regulation; and (c) teachers’ rating of students’ motivation, self-knowledge, self-direction, and relationships. Results indicated that students in the treatment group showed significantly higher scores in motivation, self-knowledge, self-direction, and relationship skills than students in the control group, with a large effect size. Please refer to the second study for information on the impact of TG on a high school population.
AdlerA. (1930). The education of children. Vail-Ballou Press.
2.
AlthubaitiA. (2016). Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9, 211–217. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S104807
3.
American School Counselor Association. (2019). ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs (4th ed.).
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
6.
BassG.LeeJ. H.WellsC.CareyJ. C.LeeS. (2015). Development and factor analysis of the protective factors Index: A report card section related to the work of school counselors. The Professional Counselor, 5, 516–528. https://doi.org/10.15241/gb.5.4.516
7.
BergerC. (2013). Bringing out the brilliance: A counseling intervention for underachieving students. Professional School Counseling, 17(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0001700102
8.
BestJ. R.MillerP. H.NaglieriJ. A. (2011). Relations between executive function and academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.007
9.
BethellC.JonesJ.GombojavN. (2019). Positive childhood experiences and adult mental and relational health in a statewide sample: Associations across adverse childhood experiences levels. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(11), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3007
10.
BlairC.DiamondA. (2008). Biological processes in prevention and intervention: The promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Development and Psychopathology, 20(3), 899–911. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000436
BlairC.RazzaR. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647−663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x
13.
BrownS. M.ShillingtonA. M. (2017). Childhood adversity and the risk of substance use and delinquency: The role of protective adult relationships. Child Abuse & Neglect, 63, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.11.006
14.
BrownT. E. (2006). Executive functions and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Implications of two conflicting views. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 53(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120500510024
15.
BruhnA. L.McDanielS. C.FernandoJ.TroughtonL. (2016). Goal-setting interventions for students with behavior problems: A systematic review. Behavioral Disorders, 41(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-41.2.107
16.
BuzzaD. C.DolM. (2015) Goal setting support in alternative math classes: Effects on motivation and engagement. Exceptionality Education International, 25(1), 35–66. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/vol25/iss1/3
17.
CarrollA.GordonK.HaynesM.HoughtonS. (2013). Goal setting and self-efficacy among delinquent, at-risk and not at-risk adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(3), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9799-y
18.
CohenJ. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
19.
CookD. A.ArtinoA. R.Jr. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
20.
CoonD. R.WalkerI. (2013). From consumers to citizens: Student-directed goal setting and assessment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2013(135), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20069
DunningD.JohnsonK.EhrlingerJ.KrugerJ. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01235
24.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school- based universal interventions. Child Development, 81, 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
25.
DweckC. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 57–88). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50005-X
FlavellJ. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
28.
FurrerC. J.SkinnerE. A.PitzerJ. R. (2014). The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students’ classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. National Society for the Study of Education, 113(1), 101–123.
29.
GestsdottirS.von SuchodoletzA.WanlessS. B.HubertB.GuimardP.BirgisdottirF.GunzenhauserC.McClellandM. (2014). Early behavioral self-regulation, academic achievement, and gender: Longitudinal findings from France, Germany, and Iceland. Applied Developmental Science, 18(2), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2014.894870
30.
Goodman-ScottE.Betters-BubonJ.OlsenJ.DonohueP. (2020). Making MTSS work. American School Counselor Association.
31.
GreenJ.LiemG. A. D.MartinA. J.ColmarS.MarshH. W.McInerneyD. (2012). Academic motivation, self-concept, engagement, and performance in high school: Key processes from a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1111–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.016
32.
GriffithC.MarianiM.McMahonH. G.ZyromskiB.GreenspanS. (2019). School counseling intervention research: A 10-year content analysis of ASCA- and ACA- affiliated journals. Professional School Counseling Journal, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X19878700
33.
GrolnickW. S.RyanR. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 143–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.143
Hahs-VaughnD. L.LomaxR. G. (2020). An introduction to statistical concepts (4th ed.). Routledge.
36.
HrbáčkováK.HladíkJ.VávrováS. (2012). The relationship between locus of control, metacognition, and academic success. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1805–1811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.130
37.
KoestnerR.LekesN.PowersT. A.ChicoineE. (2002). Attaining personal goals: Self- concordance plus implementation intentions equal success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.231
38.
LathamG. P.LockeE. A. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. European Psychologists, 12(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.290
39.
LembergerM. E.ClemensE. V. (2012). Connectedness and self‐regulation as constructs of the Student Success Skills program in inner‐city African American elementary school students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90(4), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2012.00056.x
40.
LembergerM. E.SeligJ. P.BowersH.RogersJ. E. (2015). Effects of the Student Success Skills program on executive functioning skills, feelings of connectedness, and academic achievement in a predominantly Hispanic, low-income middle school district. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00178.x
41.
LockeE. A. (2001). Self-set goals and self-efficacy as mediators of incentives and personality. In ErezM.KleinbeckU.ThierryH. (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 13–26). Erlbaum.
42.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
43.
LomaxR. G.Hahs-VaughnD. L. (2012). An introduction to statistical concepts. Routledge.
44.
McClureJ.MeyerL. H.GarischJ.FischerR.WeirK. F.WalkeyF. H. (2011). Students’ attributions for their best and worst marks: Do they relate to achievement?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.001
45.
McMahonH. G.GriffithC.MarianiM.ZyromskiB. (2017). School counseling intervention research on college readiness, college access, and postsecondary success: A 10-year content analysis of peer-reviewed research. Journal of College Access, 3(2), Article 3. http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jca/vol3/iss2/3
46.
MorisanoD.ShoreB. M. (2010). Can personal goal setting tap the potential of the gifted underachiever?Roeper Review, 32(4), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2010.508156
47.
MorningstarM. E.ShogrenK. A.LeeH.BornK. (2015). Preliminary lessons about supporting participation and learning in inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(3), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915594158
48.
NietfeldJ. L.SchrawG. (2002). The effect of knowledge and strategy explanation on monitoring accuracy. Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596583
49.
PallantJ. (2016). SPSS survival manual (6th ed.). Allen & Unwin.
50.
PatrickB. C.SkinnerE. A.ConnellJ. P. (1993). What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 781–791.
51.
PryorD. B.TollerudT. R. (1999). Applications of Adlerian principles in a school setting. Professional School Counseling, 2(4), 299–304.
52.
RobbinsS. B.LauverK.LeH.DavisD.LangleyR.CarlstromA. (2004). Do psychological and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
53.
RoordaD. L.KoomenH. M.SpiltJ. L.OortF. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
54.
RoweD. A.MazzottiV. L.IngramA.LeeS. (2017). Effects of goal-setting instruction on academic engagement for students at risk. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143416678175
55.
RowellL.HongE. (2013). Academic motivation: Concepts, strategies, and counseling approaches. Professional School Counseling, 16(3), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X1701600301
56.
RyanA. M.ShinH. (2011). Help-seeking tendencies during early adolescence: An examination of motivational correlates and consequences for achievement. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.003
57.
RyanR. M.ConnellJ. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761.
58.
SchunkD. H.MeeceJ. L.PintrichP. R. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (4th ed.). Pearson.
59.
SquierK. L.NailorP.CareyJ. C. (2014). Achieving excellence in school counseling: Through motivation, self-direction, self-knowledge, and relationships. Corwin Press.
60.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
61.
van der SluisS.de JongP. F.van der LeijA. (2007). Executive functioning in children, and its relations with reasoning, reading, and arithmetic. Intelligence, 35, 427−449. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.285470
62.
WhistonS. C.TaiW. L.RahardjaD.EderK. (2011). School counseling outcome: A meta-analytic examination of interventions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00059.x
63.
WhiteB. Y.FrederiksenJ. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
64.
WilliamsG. C.DeciE. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767
65.
ZimmermanB. J. (2008). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 267–295). Erlbaum.
66.
ZimmermanB. J.KitsantasA. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.29
67.
ZinsJ.WeissbertR.WangM.WalbergH. (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say?Teachers College Press.
68.
ZyromskiB.MartinI.MarianiM. (2019). Evaluation of the true goals school counseling curriculum: A pilot study. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 44(3), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2019.1634781
