Treatment integrity (TI) refers to the degree to which an intervention is implemented as intended. We analyzed 67 youth intervention studies published in Professional School Counseling from 1997 to 2018. More than half (55%) of the interventions were operationally defined and 16.4% of the studies monitored TI, but only 6% systematically evaluated TI. Results provide insight into school counseling interventions with implications for practicing school counselors.
American School Counselor Association. (2003). ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs.
2.
American School Counselor Association. (2012). ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs (3rd ed.).
3.
American School Counselor Association. (2019). ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs (4th ed.).
4.
CareyJ. C.DimmittC.HatchT. A.LapanR. T.WhistonS. C. (2008). Report of the national panel for evidence-based school counseling: Outcome research coding protocol and evaluation of student success skills and second step. Professional School Counseling, 11, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0801100306
CollinsK. M. T.OnwuegbuzieA. J.SuttonI. L. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed-methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 67–100.
7.
CoxJ. R.MartinezR. G.Southam-GerowM. A. (2019). Treatment integrity in psychotherapy research and implications for the delivery of quality mental health services. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000370
8.
DimmittC.CareyJ. C.McGannonW.HenningsonI. (2005). Identifying a school counseling research agenda: A Delphi study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44, 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2005.tb01748.x
9.
FallonL. M.KurtzK. D.MuellerM. R. (2017). Direct training to improve educators’ treatment integrity: A systematic review of single-case design studies. School Psychology Quarterly, 33, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000210
10.
FiskeK. E. (2008). Treatment integrity of school-based behavior analytic interventions: A review of the research. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391724
GreshamF. M.GansleK. A.NoellG. H. (1993). Treatment integrity in applied behavior analysis with children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1993.26-257
13.
GreshamF. M.MacMillanD. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. E.BocianK. M. (2010). Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/SLDRP1504_4
14.
KelleherC.Riley-TillmanT. C.PowerT. J. (2008). An initial comparison of collaborative and expert-driven consultation on treatment integrity. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 18, 294–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410802491040
15.
KupzykS.ShriverM. D. (2016). A systematic framework for addressing treatment integrity in school setting. Psychology in the Schools, 53, 954–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21955
16.
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2010). Guidelines for conducting and reporting mixed research in the field of counseling and beyond. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00151.x
17.
McIntyreL. L.GreshamF. M.DigennaroF. D.ReedD. D. (2007). Treatment integrity of school-based interventions with children in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991-2005. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.659–672
PerepletchikovaF.TreatT. A.KazdinA. E. (2007). Treatment integrity in psychotherapy research: Analysis of the studies and examination of the associated factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.829
20.
PetersonL.HomerA. L.WonderlichS. A. (1982). The integrity in independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1982.15-477
SchlosserR. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/aac.18.1.36.44
24.
SextonT. L. (1996). The relevance of counseling outcome research: Current trends and practical implications. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 590–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb02298.x
25.
SinkC. A. (2009). School counselors as accountability leaders: Another call for action. Professional School Counseling, 13, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0901300202
Sterling-TurnerH. E.WatsonT. S.MooreJ. W. (2002). The effects of direct training and treatment integrity on treatment outcomes in school consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.17.1.47.19906
28.
VillaresE.DimmittC. (2017). Updating the school counseling research agenda: A Delphi study. Counselor Education & Supervision, 56, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12071
29.
WaltzJ.AddisM. E.KoernerK.JacobsonN. S. (1993). Testing the integrity of a psychotherapy protocol: Assessment of adherence and competence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 620–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.620
30.
WheelerJ. J.BaggettB. A.FoxJ.BlevinsL. (2006). Treatment integrity: A review of intervention studies conducted with children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576060210010601
31.
WhistonS. C.SextonT. L. (1998). A review of school counseling outcome research: Implications for practice. Journal of Counseling & Development, 76, 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1998.tb02700.x
32.
WhistonS. C.TaiW. L.RahardjaD.EderK. (2011). School counseling outcome: A meta-analytic examination of interventions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00059.x
