This article addresses school counselor evidence-based accountability practice by
summarizing the findings of a hands-on evaluation of readily accessible, free
online accountability software that can be used for data collection, management
and analysis, and presentations. Using germane school data, four preservice
counselors individually rated these tools and commented on their advantages and
disadvantages for accountability work. We provide recommendations for data-based
practice and improved training.
AstramovichR. L. (2017). Program evaluation interest
and skills of school counselors. Professional School
Counseling, 20,
54–64.
doi:10.5330/1096-2409-20.1.54
10.
AtkinsonD. R.FurlongM. J.JanoffD. S. (1979). A four-component model for
proactive accountability in school counseling. The
School Counselor, 26,
222–228.
11.
BurkardA.GillenM.MartinezM.SkytteS. (2012). Implementation challenges
and training needs for comprehensive school counseling programs in Wisconsin
high schools. Professional School
Counseling, 16,
136–145.
doi:10.1177/2156759X0001600201
12.
CareyA. R. (1971). Accountability for school
counselors. The School Counselor,
18, 321–326.
13.
CareyJ. C.HarringtonK.MartinI.HoffmanD. (2012). A statewide evaluation of
the outcomes of the implementation of ASCA National Model school counseling
programs in rural and suburban Nebraska high schools.
Professional School Counseling, 16,
100–107.
doi:10.1177/2156759X0001600202
14.
CareyJ. C.HarringtonK.MartinI.StevensonD. (2012). A statewide evaluation of
the outcomes of the implementation of ASCA National Model school counseling
programs in Utah high schools. Professional School
Counseling, 16,
89–99.
doi:10.1177/2156759X0001600203
15.
ClevelandR.SinkC. A. (2018). Student happiness, school
climate, and school improvement plans: Implications for school counseling
practice. Professional School Counseling,
21, 1–10.
doi:10.1177/2156759X18761898
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative,
quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th
ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
18.
DahirC. A.StoneC. B. (2009). School counselor
accountability: The path to social justice and systemic
change. Journal of Counseling &
Development, 87,
12–20.
doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2009.tb00544.x
GysbersN. C. (2001). School guidance and
counseling in the 21st century: Remember the past into the
future. Professional School Counseling,
5, 96–105.
21.
GysbersN. C.HendersonP. (2012). Developing and managing your school
guidance and counseling program (5th ed.).
Alexandria, VA: American
Counseling Association.
22.
HartsonH. R.AndreT. S.WilligesR. C. (2001). Criteria for evaluating
usability evaluation methods. International Journal
of Human-Computer Interaction, 13,
373–410.
23.
HendersonR.PoddJ.SmithM.Varela-AlvarezH. (1995). An examination of four
user-based software evaluation methods. Interacting
with Computers, 7,
412–432.
24.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of
1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
25.
KatsiyannisA.YellM. L.BradleyR. (2001). Reflections on the 25th
anniversary of the Individuals With Disabilities Education
Act. Remedial and Special Education,
22, 324–334.
26.
KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P.PullenP. C.BadarJ. (2018). Special education: What it is and
why we need it. New York, NY:
Routledge.
27.
KontosG. (2007). A survey: A simple tool to
measure computer literacy. Engaging the Spirit
Presentations 2007: Tools for Student Success, Paper 7.
Retrieved fromhttps://digitalcommons.wku.edu/pres/7
KrumboltzJ. D. (1974). An accountability model for
counselors. The Personnel and Guidance
Journal, 52,
639–646.
30.
LapanR. T.GysbersN. C.SunY. (1997). The impact of more fully
implemented guidance programs on the school experiences of high school
students: A statewide evaluation study. Journal of
Counseling & Development, 75,
292–302.
doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1997.tb02344.x
31.
MahoneyH. J. (1950). Evaluating guidance
services. Journal of Counseling &
Development, 29,
194–197.
doi:10.1002/j.2164-5892.1950.tb00902.x
MilsomA.McCormickK. (2015). Evaluating an accountability
mentoring approach for school counselors.
Professional School Counseling, 19,
27–35.
doi:10.5330/2156759X1501900102
34.
MoserW. E. (1949). Evaluation of a guidance
program by means of student’s check list. Journal of
Educational Research, 42,
609–617.
35.
MyrickR. D. (1987). Developmental guidance and
counseling: A practical approach. Minneapolis,
MN: Educational Media
Corporation.
36.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Pub. L.
No. 107-110, § 115, Stat. 1425
(2002).
37.
PaoliniA. C. (2012). Impact of school
counselors’ use of deliberate practice and accountability measures on
perceived levels of self-efficacy and student academic
success(Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest
Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3518314)
SabellaR. A.PoyntonT. A.IsaacsM. L. (2010). School counselors perceived
importance of counseling technology competencies.
Computers in Human Behavior, 26,
609–617.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.014
41.
SabensF. S.ZyromskiB. (2009). Aligning school counselors,
comprehensive school counseling programs, and the No Child Left Behind Act
of 2001. Journal of School Counseling,
7, 1–31. Retrieved
fromhttp://jsc.montana.edu/articles/v7n31.pdf
42.
SalinaC.GirtzS.EppingaJ.MartinezD.Blumer KilianD.LozanoE.…ShinesT. (2013). All hands on deck: A
comprehensive, results-driven counseling model.
Professional School Counseling, 17,
63–75.
doi:10.1177/2156759X0001700112
43.
SinkC. (2009). School counselors as
accountability leaders: Another call for action.
Professional School Counseling, 13,
68–74.
doi:10.1177/2156759X0901300202
44.
SinkC. A.AkosP.TurnbullR.MvududuN. (2008). An investigation of
comprehensive school counseling programs and academic achievement in
Washington State middle schools. Professional School
Counseling, 12,
43–53.
doi:10.1177/2156759X0801200105
45.
SinkC.CooneyM.AdkinsC. (2017). Conducting large-scale
evaluation studies to identify characteristics of effective comprehensive
school counseling programs. In CareyJ. C.HarrisB.LeeS. M.MushaandjaJ. (Eds.), International handbook for policy research on
school-based counseling (pp. 33–52).
New York, NY:
Springer.
46.
StoneC. B.DahirC. A. (2011). School counselor accountability: A
MEASURE of student success. Columbus,
OH: Pearson Merrill/Prentice
Hall.
47.
TopdemirC. (2013). School counselors’ beliefs
about accountability. The Practitioner Scholar:
Journal of Counseling and Professional Psychology,
2, 12–22.
WilkinsonA.RobertsJ.WhileA. E. (2010). Construction of an
instrument to measure student information and communication technology
skills, experience and attitudes to e-learning.
Computers in Human Behavior, 26,
1369–1376.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.010
50.
YoungA.KaffenbergerC. (2013). Making data work: A process
for conducting action research. Journal of School
Counseling, 11,
1–31. Retrieved fromhttp://jsc.montana.edu/articles/v11n2.pdf
51.
ZyromskiB.MarianiM. A. (2016). Facilitating evidence-based,
data-driven school counseling: A manual for practice.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Corwin/Sage.
