Comprehensive School Counseling Programs and Student Achievement Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of RAMP versus Non-RAMP Schools

Abstract

This study compares school-wide Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) results in Indiana schools earning the Recognized ASCA Model Program (RAMP) designation (n = 75) with a sample of control schools stratified by level and locale (n = 226). K-12 schools earning the RAMP designation in 2007, 2008, and 2009 comprise the experimental group. Findings indicate that school-wide proficiency rates in English/Language Arts and Math are significantly higher in RAMP-designated elementary schools compared to elementary controls. Four-year longitudinal results indicate a significant positive difference between RAMP-designated elementary schools and their controls in Math. Findings provide support for the impact of comprehensive, data-driven, accountable school counseling programs at the elementary level and suggest further research is needed at the middle and secondary levels. This article presents and discusses additional results and implications for practice.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American School Counselor Association. (2003a). The ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs. Alexandria, VA: Author.

American School Counselor Association (2003b). Learn about RAMP. Retrieved from http://ascamodel.timberlakepublishing.com/content.asp?pl=11&contentid=11.

American School Counselor Association (2005). The ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.

American School Counselor Association. (2011). Past RAMP recipients. Retrieved from http://ascamodel.timberlakepublishing.com/content.asp?pl=11&sl=44&contentid=44

American School Counselor Association. (2012). RAMP scoring rubric. Retrieved from http://ascamodel.timberlakepublishing.com//Files/Rubric-2013.pdf

American Student Achievement Institute. (2012). Redesigning school counseling: Indiana standards. Retrieved from http://www.asainstitute.org/schoolcounseling/standards.html

Bodenhorn

, Wolfe

E. W.

, & Airen

O. E.

(2010). School counselor program choice and self-efficacy: Relationship to achievement gap and equity. Professional School Counseling, 13(3), 165–174.

Brigman

, & Campbell

(2003). Helping students improve academic achievement and school success behavior. Professional School Counseling, 7, 91–99.

Brigman

, Webb

, & Campbell

(2007). Building skills for school success: Improving the academic and social competence of students. Professional School Counseling, 10, 279–288.

10.

Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (2009). 2009 Standards. Retrieved from http://cacrep.org/doc/2009%20Standards%20with%20cover.pdf

11.

Carns

A. W.

, & Carns

M. R.

(1991). Teaching study skills, cognitive strategies, and metacognitive skills through self-diagnosed learning styles. The School Counselor, 38, 341–346.

12.

Clemens

E. V.

, Carey

J. C.

, & Harrington

K. M.

(2010). The school counseling program implementation survey: Initial instrument development and exploratory factor analysis. Professional School Counseling, 14(2), 125–133.

13.

Dahir

C. A.

, & Stone

C. B.

(2009). School counselor accountability: The pathway to social justice and systemic change. Journal of Counseling & Development, 8 7, 6–20.

14.

Dimmitt

, Carey

J. C.

, McGannon

, & Henningson

(2005). Identifying a school counseling research agenda: A Delphi study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44, 214–228.

15.

Dimmitt

, Carey

J. C.

, & Hatch

(2007). Evidence-based school counseling: Making a difference with data-driven practices. New York, NY: Corwin Press.

16.

Graziano

A. M.

, & Raulin

M. L.

(2007). Research methods: A process of inquiry (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

17.

Hadley

H. R.

(1988). Improving reading scores through a self-esteem intervention program. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 22, 248–252.

18.

Hatch

, & Chen-Hayes

S. F.

(2008). School counselor beliefs about ASCA National Model school counseling program components using the SCPCS. Professional School Counseling, 12(1), 34–42.

19.

Hepner

P. P.

, Wampold

B. E.

, & Kivlighan

D. M.

(2008). Research design in counseling (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.

20.

Hoag

M. J.

, & Burlingame

G. M.

(1997). Evaluating the effectiveness of child and adolescent group treatment: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26(3), 234–246.

21.

Huck

S. W.

(2000). Reading statistics and research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

22.

Indiana Department of Education, Office of Student Assessment. (2010). 2010–2011 ISTEP+ program manual: Policies and procedures for Indiana's assessment system. Indianapolis, IN: Author.

23.

Indiana Department of Education (2011a). Reports page. Retrieved from http://www.doe.in.gov/data/reports.html

24.

Indiana Department of Education (2011b). Guide to test interpretation, Grades 3–8: ISTEP+, Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress Plus. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw Hill.

25.

Indiana Department of Education (2011c). Memorandum. Retrieved from http://www.doe.in.gov/super/2011/02-February/04/documents/memo_counseling.pdf

26.

Lapan

R. T.

, Gysbers

N. C.

, & Petroski

G. F.

(2001). Helping seventh graders be safe and successful: A statewide study of the impact of comprehensive guidance and counseling programs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79, 320–330.

27.

Lapan

R. T.

, Gysbers

N. C.

, & Sun

(1997). The impact of more fully implemented guidance programs on the school experiences of high school students: A statewide evaluation study. Journal of Counseling & Development, 75, 292–302.

28.

Lee

R. S.

(1993). Effects of classroom guidance on student achievement. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 27, 163–171.

29.

Murray

V. E.

, Randolph

, & Stacey

(2008). Peeking behind the blue ribbon: How the No Child Left Behind Blue Ribbon Award helps conceal accountability-avoidance (Position Paper No. 611). Washington, DC: Independent Women's Forum.

30.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf

31.

Rosenbaum

P. R.

(2010). Design of observational studies. New York, NY: Springer.

32.

Scarborough

J. L.

(2005). The School Counselor Activity Rating Scale: An instrument for gathering process data. Professional School Counseling, 8(3), 274–283.

33.

Sink

C. A.

, & Stroh

H. R.

(2003). Raising achievement test scores of early elementary school students through comprehensive school counseling programs. Professional School Counseling, 6(5), 350–364.

34.

Steen

, & Kaffenberger

C. J.

(2007). Integrating academic interventions into small group counseling in elementary school. Professional School Counseling, 10, 516–519.

35.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. (2010). ESEA blueprint for reform. Washington, DC: Author.

36.

Ward

C. A.

(2009). An examination of the impact of the ASCA National Model on student achievement at Recognized ASCA Model Program (RAMP) elementary schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, Proquest, LLC. UMI #3401416. Corpus Christi, TX: Texas A&M University.

37.

Whiston

S. C.

, & Aricak

(2008). Development and initial investigation of the School Counseling Program Evaluation Scale. Professional School Counseling, 11, 253–261.

38.

Whiston

S. C.

, & Sexton

T. L.

(1998). A review of school counseling outcome research: Implications for practice. Journal of Counseling & Development, 76(4), 412–426.

39.

Whiston

S. C.

, Tai

W. L.

, Rahardja

, & Eder

(2011). School counseling outcome: A meta-analytic examination of interventions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(1), 37–55.

40.

Young

, & Kaffenberger

(2011). The beliefs and practices of school counselors who use data to implement comprehensive school counseling programs. Professional School Counseling, 15(2), 67–76.