Cross-age mentoring programs are peer helping programs in which high school students serve as mentors to younger children. The study in this article compared fall-to-spring changes on connectedness, attachment, and self-esteem between 46 teen mentors and 45 comparison classmates. Results revealed an association between serving as a cross-age peer mentor and improvements on academic self-esteem and connectedness. The American School Counselor Association regards coordinating a peer helping program as an appropriate activity for school counselors; this study supports this position.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkosP. T. (2000). Mentoring in the middle: The effectiveness of a school-based peer mentoring program. Unpublished dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
ArmsdenG. C., & GreenbergM. T. (1987). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Individual differences and the relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427–454.
4.
BowmanR. P., & MyrickR. D. (1987). Effects of an elementary school peer facilitator program on children with behavior problems.School Counselor, 34, 369–378.
5.
CorcoranK., & FischerJ. (2000). Measures for clinical practice: A sourcebook. Vol. 1: Couples, families, and children (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
6.
DishionT. J., McCordJ., & PoulinF. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior.American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.
7.
DuBoisD. L., FelnerR., BrandS., PhillipsR., & LeaseM. (1996). Early adolescent self-esteem: A developmental-ecological framework and assessment strategy.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 543–579.
8.
EcclesJ. S., & BarberB. L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: What kind of extracurricular involvement matters? Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 10–43.
9.
GrossmanJ. B., & RhodesJ. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring programs.American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 199–219.
10.
HamiltonS. F., & FenzelL. M. (1988). The impact of volunteer experience on adolescent social development: Evidence of program effects.Journal of Adolescent Research, 3, 6–80.
11.
HansenK. (2006). BBBS Jack-in-the-Box partnership report: Summary statistics for the Jack-in-the-Box High School Bigs pilot program for school year 2001-2002. Philadelphia: Big Brothers Big Sisters of America.
12.
HerreraC., GrossmanJ. B., KauhT. J., FeldmanA. F., & McMakenJ., with JucovyL. Z. (2007). Big Brothers Big Sisters school-based mentoring impact study.Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
13.
IkardS. S. (2001). Peer mentoring as a method to enhance moral reasoning among high school adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
14.
KarcherM.J. (2003). The Hemingway: Measure of Adolescent Connectedness: Validation studies (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED477969). Retrieved January 2, 2008, from http://www.adolescentconnectedness.com
15.
KarcherM. J. (2004). Mentor activity log from the Study of Mentoring in the Learning Environment (S.M.I.L.E.). Retrieved January 2, 2008, from http://www.utsasmile.org
16.
KarcherM. J. (2005a). Cross-age peer mentoring. In DuBoisD. L. & KarcherM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 266–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17.
KarcherM.J. (2005b). The effects of school-based developmental mentoring and mentors’ attendance on mentees’ self-esteem, behavior, and connectedness.Psychology in the Schools, 42, 65–77.
18.
KarcherM.J. (2006). What happens when high school mentors don't show up? In GoldenL. & HendersonP. (Eds.), Case studies in school counseling (pp. 44–53). Alexandria, VA: ACA Press.
19.
KarcherM. J. (2007a). Cross-age peer mentoring.Youth Mentoring: Research in Action, 1(7), 3–17.
20.
KarcherM. J. (2007b). Meet-n-Greet: A mentor-mentee matching approach for increasing the prevalence of naturally self-selected mentoring partners in program-based matches. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at San Antonio. Retrieved January 2, 2008, from http://www.utsasmile.org
21.
KarcherM.J. (2008a). The cross-age mentoring program: A developmental intervention for promoting students’ connectedness across grade levels.Professional School Counseling, 12, 137–143.
22.
KarcherM. J. (2008b). The Study of Mentoring in the Learning Environment (SMILE): A randomized study of the effectiveness of school-based mentoring.Prevention Science, 9, 99–113.
23.
KarcherM. J. (in press). Cross-age mentoring program (CAMP): Manual.Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
24.
KarcherM. J., DavisC., & PowellB. (2002). Developmental mentoring in the schools: Testing connectedness as a mediating variable in the promotion of academic achievement.School Community Journal, 12, 36–52.
25.
KarcherM. J., HolcombM., & ZambranoE. (2008). Measuring adolescent connectedness: A guide for school-based assessment and program evaluation. In ColemanH. L. K. & YehC. (Eds.), Handbook of school counseling (pp. 649–669). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
KarcherM. J., & LindwallJ. (2003). Social interest, connectedness, and challenging experiences. What makes high school mentors persist? Journal of Individual Psychology, 59, 293–315.
27.
KarcherM. J., NakkulaM. J., & HarrisJ. (2005). Developmental mentoring match characteristics: The effects of mentors’ efficacy and mentees’ emotional support seeking on the perceived quality of mentoring relationships.Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 93–110.
28.
KarcherM. J., & SassD. (2008). A multicultural assessment of adolescent connectedness: Testing theoretical factor models for invariance across gender and ethnicity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
29.
KomroK. A., & PerryC. L. (1996). Peer-planned activities for preventing alcohol use among young adolescents.Journal of School Health, 66, 328–334.
30.
LakesK., & KarcherM. J. (2005). Mentor/mentee termination ritual. In How to build a successful mentoring program using the elements of effective practice: A step-by-step tool kit for program managers (pp. 157–158). Alexandria, VA: MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership. Retrieved January 1, 2007, from http://www.mentoring.org
31.
McGannonW., CareyJ., & DimmitC. (2005). The current status of school counseling outcome research.Monographs of the Center for School Counseling Outcome Research, 2.
32.
National Association of Peer Programs. (2007). NAPP homepage. Retrieved January 26, 2009, from http://www.peerprograms.org
33.
NollV. (1997). Cross-age mentoring program for social skills development.The School Counselor, 44, 239–242.
Parenting Press. (2008). Decision Is Yours Series. Seattle, WA: Author.
36.
SheehanK., DiCaraJ. A., LeBaillyS., & ChristoffelK. K. (1999). Adapting the gang model: Peer mentoring for violence prevention.Pediatrics, 104, 50–54.
37.
StoltzA. D. (2005). The relationship between peer mentoring program participation and successful transition to high school. Unpublished dissertation, University of California at Davis.
38.
StukasA. A., ClaryG. E., & SnyderM. (2000). Service learning: Who benefits and why.Social Policy Report: Society for Research in Child Development, 13(4), 1–20.
39.
TomlinV. E. (1994). A mentor program for improving the academic attainment of Black adolescent males. Unpublished dissertation, University of Denver, CO.
40.
WestermanJ. J. (2002). Mentoring and cross-age mentoring: Improving academic achievement through a unique partnership.Unpublished dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
41.
WhistonS. C., & SextonT. L. (1998). A review of school counseling outcome research: Implications for practice.Journal of Counseling Development, 76, 412–426.
42.
YouthLaunch. (2007). The next big thing. Retrieved September 19, 2007, from http://just4bigs.org
