A survey was designed to comprehensively assess multiple aspects of school counselor job satisfaction and job-related frustration, as well as orientation with the comprehensive curriculum-based guidance program used in Arizona. The five-page survey was completed by 155 Arizona school counselors. While the majority of respondents reported high levels of job satisfaction, the least satisfying aspects of their work involved working with district administrators, spending too much time in nonguidance activities, responding to crises, and utilizing excessive time in providing system support. Respondents’ greatest levels of satisfaction involved direct interaction and engagement with students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American School Counselor Association. (2005). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
2.
BaggerlyJ., & OsbornD. (2006). School counselors’ career satisfaction and commitment: Correlates and predictors.Professional School Counseling, 9, 197–205.
3.
BelgraveL., ZablotskyD., & GuadagnoM. (2002). How do we talk to each other? Writing qualitative research for quantitative readers.Qualitative Health Research, 12, 1427–1443.
BryantR.M., & ConstantineM.G. (2006). Multiple role balance, job satisfaction, and life satisfaction in women school counselors.Professional School Counseling, 9, 265–271.
6.
CampbellC.A., & DahirC.A. (1997). Sharing the vision:The national standards for school counseling programs.Alexandria, VA: American School Counselor Association.
7.
ChataC., & LoeschL. (2007). Future school principals’ views of the roles of professional school counselors.Professional School Counseling, 11, 35–41.
8.
CobiaD., & HendersonD. (2003). Handbook of school counseling.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
9.
DeMatoD.S.,& CurcioC.C. (2004). Job satisfaction of elementary school counselors: A new look.Professional School Counseling, 7, 236–245.
10.
DollarhideC.T., & SaginakK. A. (2008). Comprehensive school counseling programs: K-12 delivery systems in action.Boston: Pearson—Allyn and Bacon.
11.
ErfordB.T. (2007). Assessment for counselors.Boston: Lahaska Press.
12.
PoyntonT.A., & CareyJ.C. (2006). An integrative model of data-based decision making for school counseling.Professional School Counseling, 10, 121–130.
13.
RayleA.D. (2006). Do school counselors matter? Mattering as a moderator between job stress and job satisfaction.Professional School Counseling, 9, 206–215.
14.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115, Stat. 1425.
15.
VandegriftJ.A. (with WrightJ.). (1997, January). Arizona public school counselors—how do they spend their time? Baseline results (Arizona School to Work Briefing Paper No.4). Phoenix: Arizona State University, School of Public Affairs, Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
