This article presents an overview of a strengths-based school discipline initiative that was developed in response to the high suspension and expulsion rates of African American and Latino male students at a racially diverse, urban high school in California. A school task force made up of adult and youth stakeholders devised a series of interventions that included student-led efforts to improve discipline policies and procedures. The initiative builds on the Strengths-Based School Counseling framework explicated by Galassi and Akos (2007), which stimulates and promotes personal accountability, leadership, resiliency, self-management, and social competence in students as opposed to merely reducing student deficits.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American School Counselor Association. (2005). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA:Author.
2.
Bay Area School Reform Collaborative. (2001). The color of discipline: Understanding racial disparity in school discipline practices.San Francisco:Author.
3.
CothranD.J., KulinnaP.H., & GarrahyD.A. (2003). “This is kind of giving a secret away Students” perspectives on effective class management.Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 435–444.
4.
DahirC.A., & StoneC.B. (2003). Accountability: A M.E.A.S.U.R.E. of the impact school counselors have on student achievement.Professional School Counseling, 8, 214–222.
5.
DelpitL. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children.Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280–298.
6.
EdelmanP., HolzerH.J., & OffnerP. (2006). Reconnecting disadvantaged young men.Washington, DC:Urban Institute.
7.
GalassiJ.P., & AkosP. (2007). Strengths-Based School Counseling: Promoting student development and achievement.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
GregoryA., & WeinsteinR.S. (in press). The discipline gap and African Americans: Defiance or cooperation in the high school classroom. Journal of School Psychology.
9.
Hipolito-DelgadoC.P., & LeeC.C. (2007). Empowerment theory for the professional school counselor: A manifesto for what really works.Professional School Counseling, 10, 327–332.
10.
Mendez, L.M.R, & KnoffH.M. (2003). Who gets suspended from school and why: A demographic analysis of schools and disciplinary infractions in a large school district.Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 30–51.
11.
Mendez, L.M.R, & KnoffH.M., & FerronJ.M. (2002). School demographic variables and out-of-school suspension rates: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of a large, ethnically diverse school district.Psychology in the Schools, 39, 259–277.
12.
MorrisJ.E., & GoldringE. (1999). Are magnet schools more equitable? An analysis of the disciplinary rates of African American and White students in Cincinnati magnet and nonmagnet schools.Equity and Excellence in Education, 32, 59–65.
13.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Statistical analysis report September 2002, public alternative schools and programs for students at risk of education failure: 2000-2001.Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics.
14.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic minorities.Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics.
15.
National Task Force on Early Childhood Education for Hispanics. (2007). Expanding and improving early education for Hispanics.Tempe, AZ:Author.
16.
OakesJ. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
17.
ReyesA. H. (2006). Discipline, achievement, and race: Is zero tolerance the answer?Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield Education.
18.
SchiraldiV., & ZiedenbergJ. (2001). Schools and suspensions: Self-reported crime and the growing use of suspensions.Washington, DC:The Justice Policy Institute.
19.
SkibaR.J.,& KnestingK. (2001). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice. In SkibaR.J. & NoamG.G. (Eds.), New directions for youth development, No.92 (pp. 17–43). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
20.
SkibaR.J., MichaelR.S., NardoA.C., & PetersonR. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment.Urban Review, 34, 317–342.
21.
SmithE.J. (2006). The strength-based counseling model.The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 13–79.
22.
TuckerC. M. (1999). African American children: A self-empowerment approach to modifying behavior problems and preventing academic failure.Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
23.
VillalbaJ. A. (2007). Culture-specific assets to consider when counseling Latina/o children and adolescents.Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 35, 15–25.
