Providing quality supervision for student counselors in pre-K–12 school settings is both a responsibility and a challenge for professionals in the field. While the ASCA National Model® for School Counseling Programs provides a detailed structure for school counseling programs, it does not explicitly include a supervision element within its four basic components. This article presents a unique supervision format and training model specifically developed within the framework of the ASCA National Model.
BaltimoreM. L., & CrutchfieldL. B. (2003). Clinical supervisor training: An interactive CD-ROM training program for the helping professions.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
BenshoffJ. (2003, September). Introduction to supervision. Supervision workshop, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
8.
BernardJ.M. (1979). Supervisor training: A discrimination model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 19, 60–68.
9.
BernardJ. M., & GoodyearR. K. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
10.
BordersL. D., & LeddickG. R. (1987). A nationwide survey of supervision training. Counselor Education and Supervision, 27, 271–283.
11.
CarrollM. (1996). Counseling supervision: Theory, skills, and practice. London: Cassell.
12.
ChagnonJ., & RussellR. K. (1995). Assessment of supervisee development and level and supervision environment across supervisor experience. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 553–558.
13.
HelmsJ. E., & CookD. A. (1999). Using race and culture in counseling and psychotherapy: Theory and process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
14.
HerlihyB., GrayN., & McCollumV. (2002). Legal and ethical issues in school counselor supervision. Professional School Counseling, 6, 55–60.
15.
HollowayE. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
LanningW. (1986). Development of the supervisor emphasis rating form. Counselor Education and Supervision, 25, 191–196.
17.
LiddleB. (1986). Resistance in supervision: A response to perceived threat. Counselor Education and Supervision, 26, 117–127.
18.
MastersM. A. (1992). The use of positive reframing in the context of supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 387–390.
NelsonM. D., JohnsonP., & ThorngrenJ. M. (2000). An integrated approach for supervising mental health counseling interns. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 22, 45–58.
21.
NelsonM. L., & FriedlanderM. L. (2001). A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee's perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 384–395.
22.
PearsonQ. M. (2001). A case in clinical supervision: A framework for putting theory into practice. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 23, 174–183.
23.
PutneyM. W., WorthingtonE. L., & McCulloughM. E. (1992). Effects of supervisor and supervisee theoretical orientation and supervisor-supervisee matching on interns' perceptions of supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 39, 258–265.
24.
RobertsW. B., & MorottiA. A. (2001). Site supervisors of professional school counseling interns: Suggested guidelines. Professional School Counseling, 4, 208–215.
25.
SpruillD. A., & BenshoffJ. M. (1996). The future is now: Promoting professionalism among counselors-in-training. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 468–471.
26.
StoltenbergC. D., McNeilB. W., & DelworthU. (1998). IDM: An integrated developmental model for supervising counselors and therapists. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
StuderJ. R. (2005). Supervising school counselors-in-training. Professional School Counseling, 8, 353–359.
28.
WilliamsA. (1995). Visual and active supervision: Roles, focus, technique. New York: Norton.
