This article presents a model of data-based decision making based on five commonly used models from both within and outside the discipline of school counseling. This integrative model is tied explicitly to the ASCA National Model® concepts, terminology, and resources. It provides school counselors with a sequence to follow for engaging in data-based decision making. The article elaborates on and discusses facilitators and barriers to implementing data-based decision making in school counseling programs, as well as implications and future directions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American School Counselor Association. (2005). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
2.
CareyJ. C., DimmittC., HatchT. A., LapanR. T., LeeC. C., & WhistonS. C. (2005). Report of the National Panel for Evidence-Based School Counseling: Outcome research coding protocol and evaluation of Student Success Skills and Second Step. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from http://www.mass.edu/schoolcounseling/PDFs/EBP/ASCA_report.pdf
3.
CookD.W. (1989). Systematic need assessments primer.Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 462–464.
4.
DahirC. A., & StoneC. B. (2003). Accountability: A M.E.A.S.U.R.E. of the impact school counselors have on student achievement.Professional School Counseling, 6, 214–221.
5.
DahlkemperL. (2002). School board leadership: Using data for school improvement. National School Board Association Research Policy Brief, 2(1).
6.
DimmittC. (2003). Transforming school counseling practice through collaboration and the use of data: A study of academic failure in high school.Professional School Counseling, 6, 340–349.
7.
FairchildT. N., & SeeleyT. J. (1995). Accountability strategies for school counselors: A baker's dozen.School Counselor, 42, 377–392.
8.
GysbersN. C., HugheyK. F., StarrM., & LapanR. T. (1992). Improving school guidance programs: A framework for program, personnel, and results evaluation.Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 565–570.
9.
HayesR. L., NelsonJ.-L., TabinM., PearsonG., & WorthyC. (2002). Using school-wide data to advocate for student success.Professional School Counseling, 6, 86–95.
10.
HouseR. M., & HayesR. L. (2002). School counselors: Becoming key players in school reform.Professional School Counseling, 5, 186–191.
11.
IsaacsM. L. (2003). Data-driven decision making: The engine of accountability.Professional School Counseling, 6, 288–295.
12.
JohnsonR. S. (2002). Using data to close the achievement gap: How to measure equity in our schools.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press, Inc.
13.
JohnsonS., & JohnsonC. D. (2003). Results-based guidance: A systems approach to student support programs.Professional School Counseling, 6, 180–185.
14.
LapanR. T. (2001). Results-based comprehensive guidance and counseling programs: A framework for planning and evaluation.Professional School Counseling, 4, 289–299.
15.
LombanaJ. H. (1985). Guidance accountability: A new look at an old problem.School Counselor, 32, 340–346.
16.
LoveN. (2002). Using data/getting results: A practical guide for school improvement in mathematics and science.Norwood, MA:Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
New York State School Counselor Association. (2005). The New York state model for comprehensive K-12 school counseling programs. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from http://www.nyssca.org/nysmodelwebversion.pdf
19.
PaisleyP. O., & HayesR. L. (2003). School counseling in the academic domain: Transformations in preparation and practice.Professional School Counseling, 6, 198–205.
20.
ProtheroeN. (2001). Improving teaching and learning with data-based decisions: Asking the right questions and acting on the answers.ERS Spectrum, 19(3), 4–9.
21.
ReynoldsS., & HinesP. L. (2000). The Indiana Student Achievement Institute: Guidance-centered whole school reform. Retrieved January 15, 2005, from http://asai.indstate.edu/ASAI-Documents.htm
TrevisanM. S. (2000). The status of program evaluation expectations in state school counselor certification requirements.American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 81–94.
24.
TrevisanM. S. (2002). Evaluation capacity in K-12 school counseling programs.American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 291–305.
