This article describes comparison group research designs and discusses how such designs can be used in school counseling research to demonstrate the effectiveness of school counselors and school counseling interventions. The article includes a review of internal and external validity constructs as they relate to this approach to research. Examples of relevant research using this design are presented.
American School Counselor Association. (2005). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
4.
BarrettP.M., WebsterH.M., & WallisJ. R. (1999). Adolescent self-esteem and cognitive skills training: A school-based intervention.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 8, 217–227.
5.
BaumanS. (2004). School counselors and research revisited.Professional School Counseling, 7, 141–151.
6.
BrigmanG., & CampbellC. (2003). Helping students improve academic achievement and school success behavior.Professional School Counseling, 7, 91–98.
7.
BrownD., & TrustyJ. (2005). School counselors, comprehensive school counseling programs, and academic achievement: Are school counselors promising more than they can deliver?Professional School Counseling, 9, 1–8.
8.
CampbellC., & BrigmanG. (2005). Closing the achievement gap: A structured approach to group counseling.Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 30, 67–82.
9.
CampbellD. T., & StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Chicago: Rand McNally.
10.
CramerS. H., HerrE. L., MorrisC. N., & FrantzT.T. (1970). Research and the school counselor.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
FarrellA. D., MeyerA. L., & WhiteK. S. (2001). Evaluation of Responding in Peaceful and Positive Ways (RIPP): A school-based prevention program for reducing violence among urban adolescents.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 451–463.
12.
GlinerJ.A., MorganG.A., & HarmonR.J. (2003). Pretest-posttest comparison group designs: Analysis and interpretation.Journal of the Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 500–503.
13.
LeeC.C., & WorkmanD.J. (1992). School counselors and research: Current status and future direction.School Counselor, 40, 15–19.
14.
LoeschL. C. (1988). Is “school counseling research” an oxymoron? In WalzG. R. (Ed.), Research and counseling: Building strong school counseling programs (pp. 169–180). Alexandria, VA: American School Counselor Association.
15.
McGannonW., CareyJ., & DimmittC. (2005). The current status of school counseling outcome research (Research Monograph No. 2). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education, Center for School Counseling Outcome Research.
16.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. (2002).
17.
PoyntonT. A. (2005). EZAnalyze (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved August 21, 2005, from http://www.ezanalyze.com
18.
SinkC. A. (2005). Comprehensive school counseling programs and academic achievement—A rejoinder to Brown and Trusty.Professional School Counseling, 9, 9–12.
19.
WebbL.D., BrigmanG.A., & CampbellC. (2005). Linking school counselors and student success: A replication of the Student Success Skills approach targeting the academic and social competence of students.Professional School Counseling, 8, 407–413.
20.
WhistonS. C. (2002). Response to the past, present, and future of school counseling: Raising some issues.Professional School Counseling, 5, 148–155.
21.
WhistonS. C., & SextonT. L. (1998). A review of school counseling outcome research: Implications for practice.Journal of Counseling & Development, 76, 412–426.
22.
WilsonN. S. (1985). School counselors and research: Obstacles and opportunities.School Counselor, 33, 111–119.
