The School Counseling Leadership Team (SCLT) is a model of a collaborative team formed to advocate for the transformed role of professional school counselors. The members of the SCLT included school district counseling supervisors, counselor educators, and leaders of statewide school counselor organizations. This article reviews the need for and evolution of the SCLT, its goals, accomplishments, and future plans. Suggestions and guidelines are offered for replicating the model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American School Counselor Association. (2005). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
2.
BemakF. (2000). Transforming the role of the counselor to provide leadership in educational reform through collaboration.Professional School Counseling, 3, 323–331.
3.
BemakF., & ChungR.C.-Y. (2005). Advocacy as a critical role for school counselors: Working toward equity and social justice.Professional School Counseling, 83, 196–202.
4.
BordersL. D. (2002). School counseling in the 21st century: Personal and professional reflections.Professional School Counseling, 5, 180–185.
5.
BurnhamJ. J., & JacksonC. M. (2000). School counselor roles: Discrepancies between actual practice and existing models.Professional School Counseling, 4, 41–49.
6.
CampbellC. A., & DahirC. A. (1997). The national standards for school counseling programs.Alexandria, VA: American School Counselor Association.
7.
HerrE.L. (2001). The impact of national policies, economics, and school reform on comprehensive guidance programs.Professional School Counseling, 4, 236–245.
8.
HerrE. L. (2002). School reform and perspectives on the role of school counselors: A century of proposals for change.Professional School Counseling, 5, 220–234.
9.
HouseR.M., & HayesR. L. (2002). School counselors: Becoming key players in school reform.Professional School Counseling, 5, 249–256.
10.
JohnsonL. (2000). Promoting professional identity in an era of educational reform.Professional School Counseling, 4, 31–40.
11.
PaisleyP. O., & HayesR. (2003). School counseling in the academic domain: Transformations in preparation and practice.Professional School Counseling, 6, 198–204.
12.
PaisleyP. O., & McMahonG. (2001). School counseling for the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities.Professional School Counseling, 5, 106–115.
13.
PerusseR., & GoodnoughG. E. (2001). A comparison of existing school counselor program content with the Education Trust initiatives.Counselor Education & Supervision, 41, 100–110.
14.
RylanderC. K. (2002). Guiding our children toward success: How Texas school counselors spend their time.A report authorized by S.B. 538, 77th Legislature (Publication No. 96-934). Austin, TX: Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts.
15.
Schwallie-GiddisP., ter MaatM., & PakM. (2003). Initiating leadership by introducing and implementing the ASCA national model.Professional School Counseling, 6, 170–173.
16.
ShoffnerM. F., & WilliamsonR. D. (2000). Engaging preservice school counselors and principals in dialogue and collaboration.Counselor Education & Supervision, 40, 128–140.
17.
StoneC. B., & ClarkM. A. (2001). School counselors and principals: Partners in support of academic achievement.NASSP Bulletin, 85(624), 46–53.
18.
StoneC. B., & DahirC. A. (2004). School counselor accountability: A MEASURE of student success.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
