Action research can be a valuable resource for strengthening the link between theory and practice in school counseling. Action research emphasizes practitioner action for change in conjunction with rigorous reflection on practice and careful gathering and analysis of data. This article presents background information on action research as well as the case for the relevance of action research to the situation that school counseling now faces as an emerging profession.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American School Counselor Association. (2005). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
2.
AndersonG. L., HerrK., & NihlenA. S. (1994). Studying your own school: An educator's guide to qualitative practitioner research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
3.
AndersonR. S., & ReiterD. (1995). The indispensable counselor.The School Counselor, 42, 268–276.
4.
ArharJ. M., HollyM. L., & KastenW. C. (2000). Action research for teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road.Columbus, OH: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
5.
Arizona School Counselors Association. (2004, November). Summit packet. Material presented at the Arizona School Counselors Association Research Summit, Tucson.
6.
AstramovichR. L., CokerJ. K., & HoskinsW. J. (2005). Training school counselors in program evaluation.Professional School Counseling, 9, 49–54.
7.
AtwehB., KemmisS., & WeeksP. (Eds.). (1998). Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education.New York: Routledge.
8.
BaumanS. (2004). School counselors and research revisited.Professional School Counseling, 7, 141–151.
9.
BrownD., & TrustyJ. (2005). School counselors, comprehensive school counseling programs, and academic achievement: Are school counselors promising more than they can deliver?Professional School Counseling, 9, 1–8.
10.
BrydolfC. (1999). Reforms rock—around the clock.California Schools, 58(1), 24–32.
11.
CampbellC. A., & DahirC. A. (1997). Sharing the vision: The national standards for school counseling programs.Alexandria, VA: American School Counselor Association.
12.
Center for Mental Health in Schools. (1999, Spring). Expanding school reform.Addressing Barriers to Learning, 4(2), 1–9.
13.
Center for Student Support Systems. (2005, December). Summit information packet. Material presented at the California School Counseling Research Summit, San Diego.
14.
CherryF., & BorshukC. (1998). Social action research and the Commission on Community Interrelations.Journal of Social Issues, 54, 119–142.
15.
DahirC. A., & StoneC. B. (2003). Accountability: A M.E.A.S.U.R.E. of the impact school counselors have on student achievement.Professional School Counseling, 6, 214–221.
16.
EganG. (2002). The skilled helper (7th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
17.
EikelandO. (2003). Unmet challenges and unfulfilled promises in action research.Concepts & Transformations, 8, 265–273.
18.
ElliottJ. (1991). Action research for educational change.Philadelphia: Open University Press.
19.
EmeryK., & OhanianS. (2004). Why is corporate America bashing our public schools?Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
20.
FairchildT. N., & SeeleyT. J. (1995). Accountability strategies for school counselors: A baker's dozen.The School Counselor, 42, 377–393.
21.
GilliesR. M. (1993). Action research for school counselors.The School Counselor, 41, 69–72.
22.
GladdingS.T. (1988). Counseling: A comprehensive profession.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
GrossM. L. (1999). The conspiracy of ignorance: The failure of American public schools.New York: Harper Collins.
25.
HartP. J., & JacobiM. (1992). From gatekeeper to advocate: Transforming the role of the school counselor.New York: The College Board.
26.
HeppnerP. P., KivlighanD. M.Jr., & WampoldB. E. (1992). Research design in counseling.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
27.
HollyM. L., ArharJ., & KastenW. (2005). Action research for teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
28.
IsaacsM. L. (2003). Data-driven decision-making: The engine of accountability.Professional School Counseling, 6, 288–296.
29.
JahodaM. (1989). Why a non-reductionistic social psychology is almost too difficult to be tackled but too fascinating to be left alone.British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 71–78.
30.
JohnsonA. P. (2005). A short guide to action research (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
31.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
LaumannE. O., & KnokeD. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
33.
LevinM. (2003). Action research and the research community.Concepts & Transformation, 8, 275–280.
34.
LewinK. (1946). Action research and minority problems.Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34–46
35.
LewinK. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics (LewinG.W., Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
36.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science.New York: Harper.
37.
LiebermanM. (1993). Public education: An autopsy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
LoeschL. C. (1988). Is “school counseling research” an oxymoron? In WalzG. R. (Ed.), Building strong school counseling programs: 1987 conference papers (pp. 169–180). Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling and Development.
39.
McClarenP. (1999). A pedagogy of possibility: Reflecting upon Paulo Freire's politics of education.Educational Researcher, 28, 49–54.
40.
McKnightJ. (1995). The careless society: Community and its counterfeits.New York: Basic.
41.
McTaggartR. (1996). Issues for participatory action researchers. In Zuber-SkerrittO. (Ed.), New directions in action research (pp. 243–256). London: Falmer Press.
MertensD. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
MinorB. J. (1981). Bridging the gap between research and practice: An introduction.Personnel & Guidance Journal, 59, 485–487.
45.
National School Boards Association. (1999, May 11). More counselors needed in schools.School Board News, 19, 5.
46.
OakesJ., Hunter QuartzK., RyanS., & LiptonM. (2000). Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in school reform.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
OuchiW. G. (2003). Making schools work: A revolutionary plan to get your children the education they need.New York: Simon & Schuster.
48.
PineG. J. (1981). Collaborative action research in school counseling: The integration of research and practice.Personnel & Guidance Journal, 59, 495–501.
49.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry.Albany, NY: State University of New York.
50.
PonteP. (1995). Action research as a further education strategy for school counseling and guidance.Educational Action Research, 3, 287–303.
51.
PulliamJ. D., & Van PattenJ. (1995). History of education in America (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
52.
ReasonP. (1994). Human inquiry as discipline and practice. In ReasonP. (Ed.), Participation in human inquiry (pp. 40–56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
ReasonP., & TorbertW. R. (2001). The action turn: Toward a transformational social science.Concepts and Transformations, 6, 1–37.
54.
RobsonC. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
55.
RowellL. L. (2004). Guide to collaborative action research in school counseling (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: University of San Diego, Center for Student Support Systems.
56.
RowellL. L. (2005). Collaborative action research and school counselors.Professional School Counseling, 9, 28–36.
57.
SagorR. (1992). How to conduct collaborative action research.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
58.
SchragP. (2003). Final test: The battle for adequacy in America's schools.New York: New Press.
59.
SextonT. L. (1996). The relevance of counseling outcome research: Current trends and practical implications.Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 590–600.
60.
SmithM.K. (2001). Kurt Lewin: Groups, experiential learning and action research.The encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved November 13, 2005, from http://www.infed.org/thinkers/et-lewin.htm
61.
StipekD. (2005, March 23). Scientifically based practice.Education Week, p. 44.
62.
StoneG. L. (1986). Counseling psychology: Perspectives and functions.Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.
63.
StringerE. T. (1999). Action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
SweeneyT. J. (1995). Accreditation, credentialing, professionalization: The role of specialties.Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 117–126.
65.
ThomasS. (2005). The school counselor alumni peer consultation group.Counselor Education & Supervision, 45, 16–29.
66.
WhistonS. C. (1996). Accountability through action research: Research methods for practitioners.Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 616–623.
67.
WhistonS. C. (2002). Response to the past, present, and future of school counseling: Raising some issues.Professional School Counseling, 5, 148–157.
68.
WhistonS. C., & SextonT. L. (1998). A review of school counseling outcome research: Implications for practice.Journal of Counseling & Development, 76, 412–426.
69.
WilkinsonM. B. (1996). Action research for people and organizational change.Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.
70.
WrightG. (1968). The ordeal of total war, 1939–1945.New York: Harper & Row.
71.
ZinckK., & LittrellJ. M. (2000). Action research shows group counseling effective with at-risk adolescent girls.Professional School Counseling, 4, 50–60.
72.
ZinnH. (1980). A people's history of the United States.New York: Harper & Row.
