In this brief article, the author responds to Brown and Trusty's assertion that based on the deficiencies of existing comprehensive school counseling program (CSCP) research, school counselors need not focus their time and effort on showing causal connections between their programs and measures of student academic achievement. Rather than defending the specific merits of the CSCP research, this rejoinder article addresses (a) the larger issue of whether Brown and Trusty have mischaracterized a key underlying results-based assumption of CSCPs, as well as (b) the value of multiple research paradigms in CSCP evaluation studies, and (c) the importance of systemic thinking and collaboration within CSCP research.
BordersL. D., & DruryS. M. (1992). Comprehensive school counseling programs: A review for policymakers and practitioners. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70, 487–498.
6.
BrigmanG., & CampbellC. (2003). Helping students improve academic achievement and school success behavior. Professional School Counseling, 7, 91–98.
7.
BronfrebrennerU., & MorrisP. A. (1998).The ecology of developmental processes. In LernerR. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol.1, pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.
8.
BrownD., & TrustyJ. (2005). Organizing and leading compre-hensive school counseling programs.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
9.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
CaronE. A., & McLaughlinM.J. (2002). Indicators of Beacons of Excellence Schools: What do they tell us about collaborative practices?Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 13, 285–313.
11.
DahirC., & StoneC. (2003). Accountability: A M.E.A.S.U.R.E. of the impact school counselors have on student achievement.. Professional School Counseling, 6, 214–221.
12.
EllisA. K. (2001). Research on educational innovations (3rd ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
13.
FriendM., & CookL. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
14.
GoldsteinH. (2001). Using pupil performance data for judging schools and teachers: Scope and limitations. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 433–443.
15.
GysbersN.C. (2003).The center of education (Preface). In The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (pp. 4–5). Alexandria, VA: American School Counselor Association.
16.
GysbersN. C., & HendersonP. (2005). Designing, implementing, and managing a comprehensive school guidance and counseling program. In SinkC. A. (Ed.), Contemporary school counseling: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 151–183).Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17.
HeppnerP. P., KivlighanD. M.Jr, & WampoldD. E. (1999). Research design in counseling (2nd ed.). New York: Wadsworth.
18.
HollandP. W. (2004, April). Evidence for causal inference in education research. Paper presented at the AERA Presidential Invited Session on Inference, Evidence and Scientific Research, American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Retrieved November 29, 2004, from http://www.ets.org/research/dload/AERA_2004-Holland.pdf
19.
KeysS., & GreenA. (2005). Enhancing developmental school counseling programs through collaboration. In SinkC. A. (Ed.), Contemporary school counseling: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 361–389). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20.
LapanR. (2005). Evaluating school counseling programs. In SinkC. A. (Ed.), Contemporary school counseling: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 257–293). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
MarzanoR. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
22.
MushenoS., & TalbertM. (2002).The transformed school counselor in action. Theory Into Practice,41,186–191.
23.
PaisleyP. O., & McMahonH. G. (2001). School counseling for the twenty-first century: Challenges and opportunities. Professional School Counseling, 5,106–115.
24.
PearlJ. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
PoggenpoelM., & MyburghC. (2003).The researcher as research instrument in educational research: A possible threat to trustworthiness? (A:research_instrument). Education,124, 418–421.
26.
SpirtesP., GlymourC., & ScheinesR. (2001). Causation, prediction, and search (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
StichterJ., ClarkeS., & DunlapG. (2004). An analysis of trends regarding proactive and ecologically valid interventions in applied research.. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 86–104.
28.
TaylorL., & AdelmanH. S. (2000). Connecting schools, families, and communities. Professional School Counseling, 3, 298–308.
29.
WhistonS. (2003). Outcomes research and school counseling services. In ErfordB.T. (Ed.), Transforming the school counseling profession (pp. 435–447). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
