Collaborative action research is an effective tool for helping school counselors to strengthen the link between practice and research. Action research methods for school counselors are summarized, and a model for collaborative action research linking counselor training and school counselor practitioners is presented. The model is based on ongoing action research projects currently being carried out in several school districts. Examples of action research projects based on this model are illustrated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcersT. A., EdringtonT. K., JonesS. M., MakaimokuJ. K., & RadestockS. A. (2000). Lighting a fire: How to implement a successful comprehensive guidance program in Southern California schools. Paper presented at the Annual Forum on the State of Guidance and Counseling in San Diego County School Districts, University of San Diego, CA.
2.
American School Counselor Association. (2003). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling pro-grams.Alexandria, VA:Author.
3.
ArharJ. M., HollyM. L., & KastenW. C. (2001). Action research for teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road.Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
4.
Association for the Improvement of Secondary Education. (1989, January). Position paper: Guidance services.Sacramento, CA: Author.
5.
BaumanS. (2004). School counselors and research revisited. Professional School Counseling, 7,141–151.
6.
BaumanS., SiegelJ., FalcoL., SeaboltK., DavisA., & SzymanskiG. (2002). School counselors’ interest in professional literature and research. Professional School Counseling, 5, 346–352.
7.
BemakF. (2000).Transforming the role of the counselor to provide leadership in educational reform through collab-oration. Professional School Counseling, 3, 323–332.
8.
Booth-CaleroC.T., HernandezJ. S., Lujano-CalderonA. R., MinnickM. J., SeitenzahlJ. C., & ThompsonM. J. (2000). Another dumb survey… does it really matter?Paper presented at the Annual Forum on the State of Guidance and Counseling in San Diego County School Districts, University of San Diego, CA.
9.
BridgesE. M., & HallingerP. (1997). Using problem-based learning to prepare educational leaders. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(2), 131–146.
10.
CampbellC. A., & DahirC. A. (1997). Sharing the vision: The national standards for school counseling programs.Alexandria, VA: American School Counselor Association.
11.
DahirC. A. (2004). Supporting a nation of learners: The role of school counseling in educational reform. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82, 344–354.
12.
DahirC. A., & StoneC. B. (2003). Accountability: A M.E.A.S.U.R.E. of the impact school counselors have on student achievement.. Professional School Counseling, 6,214–221.
13.
DeckM. D., CecilJ. H., & CobiaD. C. (1990). School counselor research as perceived by American School Counselor Association leaders: Implications for the profession.. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 25,12–20.
14.
EdSource. (1999, June). High schools in the hot seat (EdSource Report). Palo Alto, CA: Author.
15.
FairchildT. N., & SeeleyT. J. (1995). Accountability strategies for school counselors: A baker's dozen. School Counselor, 42,377–393.
16.
GilliesR. M. (1993). Action research for school counselors. School Counselor,41, 69–72.
17.
GysbersN. C. (2004). Comprehensive guidance and counseling programs: The evolution of accountability. Professional School Counseling, 8, 1–14.
18.
GysbersN. C., & HendersonP. (2000). Developing and managing your school guidance program (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
19.
HadleyR. G., & MitchellL. K. (1995). Counseling research and program evaluation.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
20.
HannaF.J., & OttensA.J.(1995).The role of wisdom in psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration,5,195–219.
21.
HeppnerP. P., KivlighanD. M.Jr, & WampoldB.E.(1992). Research design in counseling.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
22.
IsaacsM. L. (2003). Data-driven decision-making: The engine of accountability. Professional School Counseling, 6,288–296.
23.
JacobsonA. D., LeiserN. L., LowyN. B., & MacRostieN. (2001). Standing in the gap: An action research study examining a high school counseling team's quest to move forward in implementing a comprehensive guidance and counseling program.Paper presented at the Annual Forum on the State of Guidance and Counseling in San Diego County School Districts, University of San Diego, CA.
24.
JohnsonA. P. (2005). A short guide to action research (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
25.
JohnsonB., & ChristensenL. (2004). Educational research (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
26.
JohnsonC. D., and JohnsonS. K. (1998). Results-based student support programs.Training manual for Counselor Leadership Academy. San Juan Capistrano, CA:: Professional Update, Inc.
27.
JohnsonL. S. (2000). Promoting professional identity in an era of educational reform. Professional School Counseling, 4,31–41.
28.
LangerC., LeeW., MulliganB., PriseS., & ShirleyM. (1999). “Ahead by a century, “:A forum on the state of school counseling in San Diego County. Unpublished manuscript, University of San Diego, CA.
29.
LeeC. C., & WorkmanD.J. (1992). School counselors and research: Current status and future direction. School Counselor, 40,15–20.
30.
LittleJ.W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 325–340.
31.
LoeschL.C. (1988). Is “school counseling research” an oxymoron? In WalzG. R. (Ed.), Building strong school counseling programs: 1987 conference papers (pp. 169–180). Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling and Development.
32.
MertensD. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative & qualitative approaches.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
MertlerC. A., & CharlesC. M. (2005). Introduction to educational research (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
34.
PineG.J. (1981). Collaborative action research in school coun-seling: The integration of research and practice. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 59, 495–501.
35.
PonteP. (1995). Action research as a further education strategy for school counselling and guidance. Educational Action Research, 3, 287–303.
36.
RowellL. L. (1998a, August). Comprehensive professional school counseling bill: Concept paper (Joint School Counseling Legislation Task Force Report). Fullerton, CA: California School Counselors Association.
37.
RowellL. L. (1998b). CACD Professional Development Seminar Series gets underway. California Association of Counseling and Development COMPASS, 30(2), 1 & 3.
38.
RowellL. L. (1999). Some data on school counseling and San Diego County school districts. (Available from Prof. L. Rowell, Counseling Program, School of Education, University of San Diego, 5998 Alcala Park, San Diego, CA 92110-2492)
39.
RowellL. L. (2002). Preparing students for the globalized socie-ty of the twenty-first century: A comparative perspective on the ideological roots of guidance. In JohnsonC. D. & JohnsonS. K. (Eds.), Building stronger school counseling programs: Bringing futuristic approaches into the present (pp. 247–287). Greensboro, NC: ERIC/CASS.
40.
RowellL. L. (2003). Strengthening the link between theory and practice in school counseling: Action research and the reform of school counseling.. CS3 Occasional Papers. (Available from the Center for Student Support Systems, School of Education, University of San Diego, CA)
41.
RowellL. L., & LawyerC. (1997). CACES-CSCA school counseling legislation update. California Association of Counseling and Development COMPASS, 29(2), 6.
42.
SagorR. (1992). How to conduct collaborative action research.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
43.
San Diego County Office of Education. (2000). Standards for comprehensive counseling and guidance programs for San Diego County school districts(San Diego County Office of Education Report). San Diego, CA: Author.
44.
SextonT. L. (1996).The relevance of counseling outcome research: Current trends and practical implications. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74,590–600.
45.
UriarteC. M., DexterA. E., LoyaS.M., & RotyT. P. (2003). The impact of the current fiscal crisis on school counseling in San Diego County. Paper presented at the Annual Forum on the State of Guidance and Counseling in San Diego County School Districts, University of San Diego, CA.
46.
WhistonS.C. (1996). Accountability through action research: Research methods for practitioners. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 616–623.
47.
WhistonS. C. (2002). Response to the past, present, and future of school counseling: Raising some issues. Professional School Counseling, 5, 148–157.
48.
WhistonS.C., & SextonT. L. (1998). A review of school counseling outcome research: Implications for practice. Journal of Counseling & Development, 76, 412–426.
49.
ZinckK., & LittrellJ. M. (2000). Action research shows group counseling effective with at-risk adolescent girls. Professional School Counseling, 4, 50–60.
