A study was conducted to learn about using portfolio assessment with individuals with mental retardation. Data was collected from eight school sites. The participants were teachers, parents, and students with mental retardation who were involved with the portfolio assessment process. Data collection consisted of surveys, interviews, and observations. Results indicated that portfolio assessment may help foster self-determination in individuals with mental retardation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonE. L. (1995). Fostering self-determination: A guide for educators. Lawrence, KS: Lawrence Unified School District 497, KS. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 3910 237)
2.
BrothersonM. J., CookC. C., Cunconan-LahrR., & WehmeyerM. L. (1995). Policy supporting self-determination in the environments of chil- dren with disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 3–14.
3.
CarpenterC. D., RayM. S., & BloomL. A. (1995). Portfolio assessment: Opportunities and chal- lenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31, 34–41.
4.
EzellD. L. (1995). A comparative analysis of eighth- grade students' locus of control and their involvement in the portfolio assessment process. Unpublished dissertation. The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
5.
FergusonS. (1992). Zeroing in on math abilities. Learning, 21(3), 38–41.
6.
FieldS., & HoffmanA. (1992). Steps for self-determi- nation. Detroit: Developmental Disabilities Insti- tute, Wayne State University.
7.
FloodJ., & LappD. (1989). Reporting reading progress: A comparison portfolio for parents. The Reading Teacher, 42, 508–514.
8.
FrazierD. M., & PaulsonF. L. (1992). How portfolios motivate reluctant writers. Educational Leadership, 49(8), 62–65.
9.
GearhartM., HermanJ. L., BakerE. L., & Whit- takerA. K. (1992). Writing portfolios at the elemen- tary level: A study of methods for writing assessments (CSE Technical Report 337). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Stan- dards, and Testing.
10.
GlaserB. G., & StraussL.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
11.
HalloranW. D. (1993). Transition services require- ment: Issues, implication, challenge. In EavesR.C. & McLaughlinP.J. (Eds.), Recent advances in special education and rehabilitation (pp. 210–224). Boston: Andover Medical.
12.
HebertE. A. (1992). Portfolios invite reflection from students and staff. Educational Leadership, 49, 58–61.
13.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1990, Pub.L. No.: 101-476, 20 U.S.C.§ 1400, 104 Stat. 1103-1151 (1991).
14.
JasmineJ. (1992). Portfolio assessment for your whole language classroom. Huntington Beach, CA: Teacher Created Materials, Inc.
15.
LammeL. L., & HysmithC. (1991). One school's adventure into portfolio assessment. Language Arts, 68, 629–641.
16.
LipsonM., & WixonK. (1991). Assessment and in- struction of reading disability: An interactive approach. New York: Harper Collins.
17.
MartinJ. E., & MarshallL. H. (1995). Choice- Maker: A comprehensive self-determination tran- sition program. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 147–156.
18.
MortonJ. L. (1991). What teachers want to know about portfolio assessment. Tahlequah, OK: Northeastern State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 336 728)
19.
NoletV. (1992). Classroom-based measurement and portfolio assessment. Diagnostique, 18, 5–26.
20.
Options, Inc. (1993). Portfolio assessment: A means for authentic classroom assessment. Bedford, NH: Options, Inc.
PaulsonF. L., PaulsonP. R., & MeyerC. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a porfolio?Educational Leadership, 48, 60–63.
23.
RiefL. (1990). Finding the value in education: Self-assessment in a middle school classroom. Ed- ucational Leadership, 47, 24–29.
24.
SalendS. J. (1998). Using portfolios to assess stu- dent performance. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(2), 36–43.
25.
SchlossP.J., AlperS., & JayneD. (1994). Self- determination for persons with disabilities: Choice, risk, and dignity. Exceptional Children, 60, 215–225.
26.
StenmarkJ. K. (1989). Mathematics assessment: Myths, models, good questions, and practical suggestions. (Report # ISBN-0-87353-339-9). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathemat- ics, Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 345 943)
27.
TierneyR. J., CarterM. A., & DesaiL. E. (1991). Portfolio assessment in the reading-writing classroom. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
28.
ValcenciaS. (1990). A portfolio approach to class- room reading assessment: The whys, whats, and hows. The Reading Teacher, 43, 338–340.
29.
WardM. J. (1988). The many facets of self-deter- mination. Transition Summary, 5, 2–3.
