Teaching Community Skills to Students with Moderate Disabilities: Comparing Combined Techniques of Classroom Simulation,Videotape Modeling,and Community-based Instruction
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 1999
Teaching Community Skills to Students with Moderate Disabilities: Comparing Combined Techniques of Classroom Simulation,Videotape Modeling,and Community-based Instruction
The investigator used a constant time delay procedure to teach 3 secondary students with moderate mental disabilities the community skills of mailing a letter, cashing a check, and crossing a street. The instructional format was counterbalanced across skills and students and consisted of (a) classroom simulation plus community-based instruction, (b) videotape modeling plus community-based instruction, and (c) classroom simulation plus videotape modeling plus community-based instruction. Generalization probe sessions conducted within a multiple probe design evaluated generalization to novel community settings. Effectiveness data showed that all instructional formats were effective in teaching the skills and resulted in generalization to novel community settings; however, efficiency data showed the combination of classroom simulation and community-based instruction to be the most efficient procedure across participant in terms of time to criterion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlcantaraP. R. (1994). Effects of videotape instructional package on purchasing skills of children with autism. Exceptional Children, 61, 40–55.
2.
AultM., GastD. L., & WoleryM. (1988). Comparison of progressive and constant time delay procedures in teaching community-sign word reading. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 44–56.
3.
BlackhurstA. E., SchusterJ. W., AultM. J., & DoyleP. M. (1996). The Single Subject Research Advisor (computer software). Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky.
4.
BrownF., & SnellM. E. (1993). Measurement, analysis, and evaluation. In SnellM. E. (Ed.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (4th Ed., pp. 152–183). New York, NY: Macmillan.
5.
BrownL., NisbetJ., FordA., SweetM., ShiragoB., YorkJ., & LoomisR. (1983). The critical need for nonschool instruction in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 8, 71–77.
6.
ChandlerW., SchusterJ. W., & StevensK. B. (1993). Teaching employment skills to adolescents with mild and moderate disabilities using a constant time delay procedure. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 155–168.
7.
Clement-HeistK., SiegelS., & Gaylord-RossR. (1992). Simulated and in situ vocational social skills training for youth with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 336–345.
8.
CollinsB. C., StinsonD. M., & LandI. (1993). A comparison of in vivo and simulation prior to in vivo instruction in teaching generalized safety skills. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 128–142.
9.
CuvoA., & KlattK. P. (1992). Effects of community-based, videotape, and flashcard instruction of community-referenced sight words on students with mental retardation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 499–512.
10.
GastD. L., CollinsB. C., WoleryM., & JonesR. (1993). Teaching preschool children with disabilities to respond to the lure of strangers. Exceptional Children, 59, 301–311.
11.
HaringT. G., KennedyC. H., AdamsM. J., & Pitts-ConwayV. (1987). Teaching generalization of purchasing skills across community settings to autistic youth using videotape modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 89–96.
12.
MarchettiA. G., McCartneyJ. R., DrainS., HooperM., & DixJ. (1983). Pedestrian skills training for mentally retarded adults: Comparison of training in two settings. Mental Retardation, 21, 107–110.
13.
McDonnellJ. J., HornerR. H., & WilliamsJ. A. (1984). Comparison of three strategies for teaching generalized grocery purchasing to high school students with severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 123–133.
14.
MisraA. (1992). Generalization of social skills through self-monitoring by adults with mild mental retardation. Exceptional Children, 58, 495–507.
15.
NeefN. A., LensbowerJ., HockersmithI., De-PalmaB., & GrayK. (1990). In vivo versus simulation training: An interactional analysis of range and type of training exemplars. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 447–458.
16.
NietupskiJ., Hamre-NietupskiS., ClancyP., & VeerhusenK. (1986). Guidelines for making simulation an effective adjunct to in vivo community instruction. Journal of the Association for Severe Handicaps, 11, 12–18.
17.
SchusterJ. W., GastD. L., WoleryM., & GuiltinanS. (1988). The effectiveness of a constant time delay procedure to teach chained responses to adolescents with mental retardation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 169–178.
18.
SpragueJ. R., & HornerR. H. (1984). The effects of single instance, multiple instance, and general case training on generalized vending machine use by moderately and severely handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 273–278.
19.
StokesT. F., & BaerD. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
20.
StokesT. F., & OsnesP. G. (1986). Programming the generalization of children's social behavior. In StrainP. S., GuralnickM. J., & WalkerH. J. (Eds.), Children's social behavior: Development, assessment and modification (pp. 407–443). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
WechslerD. (1974). Manual for Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Revised. New York: Psychological Corp.
23.
WinterlingV., GastD. L., WoleryM., & FarmerJ. A. (1992). Teaching safety skills to high school students with moderate disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 217–227.
24.
WoleryM., BaileyD. B., & SugaiG. M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
