Teacher and Researcher Co-Design Self-Management Content for an Inclusive Setting: Research Training,Intervention,and Generalization Effects on Student Performance
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 1999
Teacher and Researcher Co-Design Self-Management Content for an Inclusive Setting: Research Training,Intervention,and Generalization Effects on Student Performance
Self-management instruction lead toward a decreased level of adult supervision for a second grade student with multiple disabilities during travel periods throughout each day. Changing conditions multiple baseline design was used in settings in which an adult accompanied the student in the hallways. This study blended (a) self-management instruction, (b) generalization methodologies (general case programming and multiple exemplars), and (c) a high level of teacher involvement in designing and monitoring the self-management system. Implications for researchers and practitioners co-designing self-management content for inclusive settings are described, as well as implications for self-management as “specialized instruction” that promotes student independence and fades adult support.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertoP. A., & TroutmanA. C. (1995). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
2.
BinderC. (1994). Measurably superior instructional methods: Do we need sales and marketing? In GardnerR., SinatorD. M., CooperJ. O., HeronT. E., HewardW. L., EshlemanJ., & GrossT. A. (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 21–32). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
3.
BrowderD. M., & ShapiroE. S. (1985). Applications of self-management to individuals with severe handicaps: A review. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 200–208.
4.
CarpenterS. L., MusyT., & King-SearsM. E. (1997). Behavior management methods. In BradleyD. F., King-SearsM. E., & SwitlickD. M. (Eds.), Teaching students in inclusive settings: From theory to practice (pp. 322–364). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
ChironR., & GerkenK. (1983). The effects of a self-monitoring technique on the locus of control orientation of educable mentally retarded children.School Psychology Review, 12, 87–92.
6.
DeshlerD. D., EllisE. S., & LenzB. K. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities. Denver: Love Publishing.
7.
HallL. J., McClannahanL. E., & KrantzP. J. (1995). Promoting independence in integrated classrooms by teaching aides to use activity schedules and decreased prompts. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 208–217.
8.
HaringN. G., & LibertyK. A. (1990). Matching strategies with performance in facilitating generalization. Focus on Exceptional Children, 22(6), 1–16.
9.
HornerR. H., & BrighamT. A. (1979). The effects of self-management procedures on the study behavior of two retarded children. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 41, 18–24.
10.
HughesC., & AgranM. (1993). Teaching persons with severe disabilities to use self-instruction in community settings: An analysis of applications. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18, 261–274.
11.
HughesC. A., & BoyleJ. R. (1991). Effects of self-monitoring for on-task behavior and task productivity on elementary students with moderate mental retardation. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 96–111.
12.
HughesC. A., KorinekL., & GormanJ. (1991). Self-management for students with mental retardation in public school settings: A research review. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 271–291.
13.
JacksonT. L., & AltmanR. (1996). Self-management of aggression in an adult male with mental retardation and severe behavior disorders. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 55–65.
14.
JohnstonJ. M. (1993). A model for developing and evaluating behavioral technology. In Van HoutenR., & AxelrodS. (Eds.), Behavioral analysis and treatment (pp. 323–344). New York: Plenum.
15.
KauffmanJ. M. (1996). Research to practice issues. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 55–59.
16.
King-SearsM. E. (1994). Curriculum-based assessment in special education. San Diego: Singular.
17.
King-SearsM. E., & CarpenterS. L. (1997). Teaching self-management for elementary students with developmental disabilities. Innovations. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
18.
King-SearsM. E., & CummingsC. S. (1996). Inclusive practices of classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 217–225.
19.
KoegelL. K., KoegelR. L., HurleyC., & FreaW. D. (1992). Improving social skills and disruptive behavior in children with autism through self-management. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 341–353.
20.
MacDuffG. S., KrantzP. J., & McClannahanL. E. (1993). Teaching children with autism to use photographic activity schedules: Maintenance and generalization of complex response chains. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 89–97.
21.
McCarlJ. J., SvobodnyL., & BeareP. L. (1991). Self-recording in a classroom for students with mild to moderate mental handicaps: Effects on productivity and on-task behavior. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 79–88.
22.
NewmanB., BuffingtonD. M., & HemmesN. S. (1996). Self-reinforcement used to increase the appropriate conversation of autistic teenagers. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 304–309.
23.
PierceK. L., & SchreibmanL. (1994). Teaching daily living skills to children with autism in unsupervised settings through pictorial self-management. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 471–481.
24.
PraterM. A., HoganS., & MillerS. R. (1992). Using self-monitoring to improve on-task behavior and academic skills of an adolescent with mild handicaps across special and regular education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 43–55.
25.
RichardsonV. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 10–18.
26.
RobertsonS. J., SimonS. J., PachmanJ. S., & DrabmanR. S. (1979). Self-control and generalization procedures in a classroom of disruptive retarded children. Child Behavior Therapy, 1, 347–362.
27.
ShapiroE. S., BrowderD. M., & D'HuyvettersK. K. (1984). Increasing academic productivity of severely multi-handicapped children with self-management: Idiosyncratic effects. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 4, 171–188.
28.
ShapiroE. S., & KleinR. D. (1980). Self-management of classroom behavior with retarded/disturbed children. Behavior Modification, 4, 83–97.
29.
ShapiroE. S., McGonigleJ. J., & OllendickT. H. (1980). An analysis of self-assessment and self-reinforcement in a self-managed token economy with mentally retarded children. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 1, 227–240.
30.
StahmerA. C., & SchreibmanL. (1992). Teaching children with autism appropriate play in unsupervised environments using a self-management treatment package. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 447–459.
31.
StrainP. S., KohlerF. W., StoreyK., & DankoC. D. (1994). Teaching preschoolers with autism to self-monitor their social interactions: An analysis of results in home and school settings. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2(2), 78–88.
32.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996). Self-determination as an educational outcome: Why is it important to children, youth and adults with disabilities? In SandsD. J., & WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 15–34). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
