Numerous studies have demonstrated the positive effects of the Good Behavior Game (GBG); however, limited information exists on the impact of the GBG on students with severe disabilities. This study investigated the impact of the GBG on students with severe disabilities and their off-task behaviors. Three students in three self-contained elementary classrooms and three special education teachers participated in this study. Special Education teachers implemented the GBG during whole group instruction, and researchers used a momentary time sample to measure the percentage of student off-task behavior. A multiple-probe baseline design organized the data to analyze the overall effects of the intervention. All participants showed a decrease in offtask behavior during the GBG. Implementing teachers found the intervention to be socially valid.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlgozzineB.WangC.VioletteA. S.Reexamining the relationship between academic achievement and social behaviorJournal of Positive Behavior Interventions1313–162011
2.
BarrishH. H.SaunderM.WolfM. M.Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroomJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis22119–1241969
3.
BodenL. J.EnnisR. P.JolivetteK.Implementing Check In/Check Out for students with intellectual disability in self-contained classroomsTeaching Exceptional Children45132–392012
4.
Bowman-PerrottL.BurkeM. D.ZainiS.ZhangN.VannestK.Promoting positive behavior using the good behavior game: A metaanalysis of single-case researchJournal of Positive Behavior Interventions183180–1902016
5.
BreemanL. D.Van LierP. A CWubbelsT.VerhulstF. C.EndeJ. V DMarasA.StruiksmaA. J CHopmanJ. A BTickN. T.Effects of the good behavior game on the behavioral, emotional, and social problems of children with psychiatric disorders in special education settingsJournal of Positive Behavior Interventions183156–1672016
6.
CrimminsD.FarrellA. F.Individualized behavioral supports at 15 years: It's still lonely at the topResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities31131–452006
7.
DaviesS.WitteR.Self-management and peer monitoring within a group contingency to decrease uncontrolled verbalizations of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807 Psychology in the Schools https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807 37135–1472000<135: AID-PITS5>3.0.CO;2-U
8.
EmbryD. D.The Good Behavior Game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccineClinical Child and Family Psychology Review54273–2972002
FlowerA.MckennaJ. W.BunuanR. L.MuethingC. S.VegaR.Effects of the good behavior game on challenging behaviors in school settingsReview of Educational Research844546–5712014
11.
FreemanR.EberL.AndersonC.IrvinL.HornerR.BoundsM.DunlapG.Building inclusive school cultures using schoolwide positive behavior support: Designing effective individual support systems for students with significant disabilitiesResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities3114–172006
12.
GastD. L.LloydB. P.LedfordJ. R.GastD. L.LedfordJ. R.Multiple baseline and multiple probe designsSingle case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciencesRoutledge/Taylor & Francis Group251–2962014nd ed.
13.
GreshamF. M.GreshamG. N.Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behaviorThe Journal of Special Education161101–1101982
14.
GrovesE. A.AustinJ. L.An evaluation of interdependent and independent group contingencies during the good behavior gameJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis503552–5662017
15.
HawkenL. S.NeillR. E.Including students with severe disabilities in all levels of schoolwide positive behavior supportResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities31146–532006
16.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.AndersonC. M.Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support 10.17161/foec Focus on Exceptional Children https://doi.org/10.17161/foec 4282010
17.
KurthJ. A.EnyartM.Schoolwide positive behavior supports and students with significant disabilities: Where are we?Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities413216–2222016
18.
LeflotG.Van LierP. A COnghenaP.ColpinH.The role of teacher behavior management in the development of disruptive behaviors: An intervention study with the good behavior gameJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology386869–8822010
19.
LomanS. L.Strickland-CohenM. K.WalkerV. L.Promoting the accessibility of SWPBIS for students with severe disabilitiesJournal of Positive Behavior Interventions202113–1232018
20.
LynneS.University of Southern MississippiInvestigating the use of a positive variation of the good behavior game in a high school setting2015Master's thesis
21.
ProquestLlc
22.
OsteinE. M OEvaluating the good behavior game for high school students with disabilities2017Master's thesisSaint Mary's College of California
23.
ProquestLlc
24.
ParsonsM. B.RollysonJ. H.ReidD. H.Evidence-based staff training: A guide for practitionersBehavior Analysis in Practice522–112012
25.
PattersonK.The effects of a group-oriented contingency-the good behavior gameon the disruptive behavior of children with developmental disabilities2003Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University
26.
ProquestLlc
27.
PenningtonB.MccomasJ. J.Effects of the good behavior game across classroom contextsJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis501176–1802017
28.
ReinkeW. M.HermanK. C.StormontM.Classroom-level positive behavior supports in schools implementing SW-PBIS: Identifying areas for enhancementJournal of Positive Behavior Interventions15139–502013
29.
StrattonK. K.GadkeD. L.MortonR. C.Using the good behavior game with high school special education students: Comparing student and teacher selected reinforcersJournal of Applied School Psychology352105–1212019
30.
SugaiS.SimonsenB.BradshawnC.HornerR.LewisT. J.McleskeyJ.WaldronN. L.SpookerF.AlgozzineB.Delivering high quality schoolwide positive behavior supportHandbook of effective inclusive schools: Research and practiceRoutledge306–3212014
31.
TankersleyM.A group-oriented contingency management program: A review of research on the Good Behavior Game and implications for teachers 10.1080/1045988X.1995.9944646 Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.1995.9944646 4019–241995
32.
TanolG.JohnsonL.MccomasJ.CoteE.Responding to rule violations or rule following: A comparison of two versions of the good behavior game with kindergarten studentsJournal of School Psychology482337–3552010
33.
ThurlowM. L.LazarusS. D.LarsonE. D.AlbusD. A.LiuK. K.KwongE.Applied Engineering Management Corporation (AEM)Alternate assessments for students with significant cognitive disabilities: Participation guidelines and definitions2017NCEO Report 406. National Center on Educational Outcomes
34.
TingstromD. H.Sterling-TurnerH.WilczynskiS. M.The good behavior game: 1969-2002Behavior Modification302225–2532006
35.
WahlE.HawkinsR. O.HaydonT.MarsicanoR.MorrisonJ. Q.Comparing versions of the good behavior game: Can a positive spin enhance effectiveness?Behavior Modification404493–5172016
36.
WalkerV. L.LomanS. L.HaraM.ParkK. L.Strickland-CohenKathleen M.Examining the inclusion of students with severe disabilities in schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supportsResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities434223–2382018
37.
WrightR. A.MccurdyB. L.Classwide positive behavior support and group contingencies: Examining a positive variation of the good behavior gameJournal of Positive Behavior Interventions143173–1802012
