Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2013-6
Evaluation of Manual Spelling,Observational and Incidental Learning Using Computer-Based Instruction with a Tablet PC,Large Screen Projection,and a Forward Chaining Procedure
The study employed a multiple probe design to investigate the effects of computer-based instruction (CBI) and a forward chaining procedure to teach manual spelling of words to three young adults with moderate intellectual disability in a small group arrangement. The computer-based program included a tablet PC whereby students wrote words directly onto a multi-touch screen. Words were projected onto a large screen in order to measure observational learning of other students' words. The study further evaluated acquisition of incidental information (reading target and observational spelling words) within the small group arrangement. Results indicated that students improved their spelling performance using the CBI package as well as their ability to read the grocery store words. Findings are discussed in the context of providing instruction in small group arrangements using commercially available technologies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alber-MorganS. R.HesslerT.KonradM.Teaching writing for keepsEducation and Treatment of Children30107–1282007
2.
BirdE.CleaveK.WhiteP. L.PikeD.HelmkayH.A.Written and oral narratives of children and adolescents with Down syndromeJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research51436–4502008
3.
BlischakD. M.SchlosserR. W.Use of technology to support independent spelling by students with autismTopics in Language Disorders23293–3042003
4.
CampbellM. L.MechlingL. C.Small group computer assisted instruction with SMART-Board technology: An investigation of observational and incidental learning of non-target informationRemedial and Special Education30147–572009
5.
Coleman-MartinM.HellerK. W.Using a modified constant prompt-delay procedure to teach spelling to students with physical disabilitiesJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis37469–4802004
6.
CuvoA. J.AshleyK. M.MarsoK. J.ZhangB. L.FryT. A.Effect of response practice variables on learning spelling and sight vocabularyJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis28155–1731995
7.
De RoseJ. C.De SouzaD. G.HannaE. S.Teaching reading and spelling: Exclusion and stimulus equivalenceJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis29451–4691996
8.
DudeW. V.McdonaldS. J.McilvaneW. J.MackayH. A.Constructed-response matching to sample and spelling instructionJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis24305–3171991
9.
FarmerJ. A.GastD.WoleryM.WinteringV.Small group instruction for students with severe handicaps: A study of observational learningEducation and Training in Mental Retardation26190–2011991
10.
GastD. L.Single subject research and methodology in behavioral sciencesRoutledgeNew York, NY2010
11.
GrahamS.MillerL.Spelling research and practice: A unified approachFocus on Exceptional Children12155–1731979
12.
HeronT. E.OkyereB. A.MillerA. D.A taxonomy of approaches to teach spellingJournal of Behavioral Education1117–1301991
13.
JosephL. M.KonradM.Teaching students with intellectual or developmental disabilities to write: A review of the literatureResearch in Developmental Disabilities301–92009
14.
KeelM. C.GastD. L.Small-group instruction for students with learning disabilities: Observational and incidental learningExceptional Children58357–3691992
15.
KinneyE. M.VedoraJ.StromerR.Computer-presented video models to teach generative spelling to a child with an autism spectrum disorderJournal of Positive Behavior Interventions522–292003
16.
KonradM.TrelaK.Now! Extending writing strategies to support all studentsGo 4 it3942–512007
17.
MacarthurC. A.New tools for writing: Assistive technology for students with writing difficultiesTopics in Language Disorders20485–1002000
18.
McnaughtonD.TawneyJ.Comparison of two spelling instruction techniques for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication972–821993
19.
MechlingL. C.GastD. L.KrupaK.Impact of SMART Board technology: An investigation of sight word reading and observational learningJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders371869–18822007
20.
MechlingL. C.GastD. L.ThompsonK. L.Comparison of the effects of SMART-Board technology and flash card instruction upon sight word recognition and observational leaning during small-group instructionJournal of Special Education Technology23134–462008
21.
MorrisD.NelsonL.PerneyJ.Exploring the concept of “spelling instructional level” through the analysis of error typesThe Elementary School Journal87180–2001986
22.
PrestJ. M.MirendaP.MercierD.Using symbol-supported writing software with students with Down syndrome: An exploratory studyJournal of Special Education Technology2521–122010
23.
PrestJ. M.MirendaP.MercierD.10.3104/reports.2133Effects of word prediction software on the written output of students with Down syndrome2010Down Syndrome Research and Practice
24.
RamdossS.MulloyA.LangR.O'reillyM.SigafoosJ.LancioniG. . .ZeinF. E.Use of computer-based interventions to improve literacy skills in students with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review51306–13182011Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
25.
RoarkT. J.CollinsB. C.HemmeterM. L.KleinertH.Including manual signing as nontargeted information wen using a constant time delay procedure to teach receptive identification of packaged food itemsJournal of Behavioral Education1119–382002
26.
RousseauM. K.KrantzP. J.PoulsonC. L.KitsonM. E.McclannahanL. E.Sentence combining as a technique for increasing adjective use in writing by students with autism1519–371994Research in Developmental Disabilities
27.
SchlosserR. W.BlischakD. M.Effects of speech and print feedback on spelling by children with autismJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research47848–8622004
28.
SchlosserR. W.BlischakD. M.Is there a role for speech output in interventions for persons with autism? A reviewFocus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities16170–1782001
29.
SchoenS. F.OgdenS.Impact of time delay, observational learning, and attentional cuing upon word recognition during integrated small-group instructionJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders25503–5191995
SchusterJ. W.MorseT. E.GriffenA. B.WoleryT.Teaching peer reinforcement and grocery words: An investigation of observational learning and instructive feedbackJournal of Behavioral Education6511–5331996
StromerR.MackayH. A.Delayed iden-tity matching to complex samples: Teaching Students with mental retardation spelling and the prerequisites of equivalence classesResearch in Developmental Disabilities1419–381993
34.
StromerR.MackayH. A.HowellS. R.McvayA. A.FlusserD.Teaching computerbased spelling to individuals with developmental and hearing disabilities: Transfer of stimulus control to writing tasksJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis2925–421996
35.
SturmJ.KoppenhaverD. A.Supporting writing development in adolescents with developmental disabilitiesTopics in Language Disorders20273–922000
VedoraJ.StromerR.Computer-based spelling instruction for students with developmental disabilities28489–5052007Research in Developmental Disabilities
38.
WechslerD.Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third EditionPsychological CorporationSan Antonio, TX1991
39.
WestlingD. L.FoxL.Teaching students with severe disabilitiesMerrill Prentice HallUpper Saddle River, NJ2009th ed.
40.
YamamotoJ.MiyaT.Acquisition and transfer of sentence construction in autistic students: Analysis by computer-based teaching. Research in Developmental Disabilities20355–3771999
