There is limited research demonstrating Direct Instruction (DI) as an effective reading comprehension intervention for students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and developmental disabilities (DD). Previous research has shown that DI, when portions of the program were implemented, resulted in increased skills (Flores & Ganz, 2007; Flores & Ganz, 2009). The purpose of this pilot study was to implement DI comprehension programs without modification, using whole lessons. Eighteen elementary students with ASD or DD participated in the study and data were collected using curriculum-based assessments. One-way analyses of variance indicated that there were significant differences in students' skills over time. Results and their implications will be discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BradfordS.ShippenM. E.AlbertoP. A.HouchinsD. E.FloresM. M.Using systematic instruction to teach decoding skills to middle school students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities41332–3422006
2.
BrowderD. H.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.HarrisA. A.WakemanS.A metaanalysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilitiesExceptional Children74407–4322008
3.
BrowderD. H.WakemanS. Y.SpoonerF.DelzellL.AlgozzineB.Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilitiesExceptional Children72392–4082006Ahlgrim-
4.
CarlsonC.FrancisD.Increasing the reading achievement of at-risk children through Direct Instruction: Evaluation of the Rodeo Institute for Teacher Excellence (RITE)Journal of Education for Children Placed at Risk7141–1662002
5.
CarnineD. W.SilbertJ.KameenuiE. J.TarverS. G.Direct Instruction ReadingPearsonUpper Saddle River, NJ2004th ed.
6.
ChiangH.LinY.Reading comprehension instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A review of the literatureAutism and Other Developmental Disabilities22259–2672007
7.
EngelmannS.CarnineD.Theory of instruction: Principles and applications (revised edition)ADI PressEugene, OR1991
FloresM. M.GanzJ.Effectiveness of Direct Instruction for teaching statement inference, use of facts, and analogies to students with developmental disabilities and reading delaysFocus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities22244–2512007
12.
FloresM. M.GanzJ.Effects of Direct Instruction on the reading comprehension of students with autism and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities4439–532009
13.
FloresM. M.ShippenM. E.AlbertoP. A.CroweA.Teaching letter-sound correspondence to students with moderate intellectual disabilitiesJournal of Direct Instruction4173–1882004
14.
FoormanB.FrancisD.FletcherJ.SchatschneiderC.The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in children at-riskJournal of Educational Psychology9037–551998
15.
FredrickL. D.KeelM. C.NeelJ. H.Making the most of instructional time: Teaching reading at an accelerated pace to students at riskJournal of Direct Instruction257–632002
16.
GanzJ.FloresM.The effectiveness of Direct Instruction for teaching language to children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Identifying materialsJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders3975–832009
17.
GrossenB.Success of a Direct Instruction model at a secondary level school with high-risk studentsReading & Writing Quarterly20161–1782004
18.
HammillD. D.NewcomerP. L.Test of language development-intermediate, 4 th ed. San AntonioPearsonTX2008
19.
HammillD. D.NewcomerP. L.Test of language development-primary, 4 th edPearsonSan Antonio, TX2008
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Acts ofPub. L108–4462004amending 20 U.S.C. § § 1440 et seq.
21.
Marchand-MartellaN.Lignugaris-KraftB.PettigrewT.LeishmanR.Utah State UniversityDirect instruction supervision systemLogan UT1995
22.
National Research CouncilEducating children with autismNational Academy PressWashington, DC2001
23.
O'connorI. M.KleinP. D.Exploration of strategies for facilitating the reading comprehension of high-functioning students with autism spectrum disordersJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders34115–1272004
24.
RoidG. H.MillerL. J.CoStoeltingShippenM. E.HouchinsD. E.SteventonC.SartorD. L.A comparison of two direct instruction reading programs for urban middle school studentsRemedial and Special EducationWood-Dale, IL263175–1822002Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised
25.
ShippenM. E.HouchinsD. E.SteventonC.ColarussoR.O'rourkeC.Reading assessment and instruction for students at riskSpecial Education for All TeachersKendall HuntDubuque, IA2010th ed.
26.
TorgesenJ.AlexanderA.WagnerR.RashotteC.VoellerK.ConwayT.Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approachesJournal of Learning Disabilities3433–582001
27.
U. S. Department of Education.No Child Left Behind: A desktop referenceAuthorWashington, DC2002
28.
WhalonK.OtaibaS.DelanoM.Evidenced-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disordersFocus on Autism and Developmental Disabilities243–162009
29.
ZayacR.Direct Instruction reading: Effects of the Reading Mastery Plus-Level K curriculum on preschool children with developmental delaysAuburn University Theses and Dissertations2009
