Is a functional curriculum aligned with the federal education policies of
and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, 2004)? This article analyzes the alignment, or lack thereof, between this approach to educating secondary students with mild mental impairment and the two main federal education laws governing their education. It explores the relationship across four areas: general education curriculum and setting, accountability, highly qualified teachers, and scientifically-based research. The analysis suggests that there may be a conflict of interest between the functional curriculum model and federal legislation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BenzM. R.LindstromL.LattaT.Improving collaboration between schools and vocational rehabilitation: The youth transition program modelJournal of Vocational Rehabilitation1355–631999
2.
BenzM. R.LindstromL. E.YovanoffP.Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectivesExceptional Children66509–5292000
3.
BiggeJ.Curriculum based instruction for special education studentsMountain View, CA1988
4.
BiggeJ. L.StumpC. S.SpagnaM. E.SilbermanR. K.Curriculum, assessment, and instruction for students with disabilitiesWadsworthBelmont, CA1999
5.
BillingsleyF.SingerG.The problem and the place of functional skills in inclusive settingsThe role of functional skills and behavior instructional methods in inclusive education. The Annual Meeting for Persons with Severe HandicapsBoston, MA1997. December
6.
BillingsleyF. F.AlbertsonL. R.Finding a future for functional skillsThe Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps24298–3021999
7.
BouckE. C.Lost in translation?: Educating secondary students with mild mental impairmentJournal of Disability Policy Studies1879–872007
8.
BouckE. C.Exploring secondary special education for mild mental impairment: A program in search of its placeRemedial and Special Education25367–3822004
9.
BouckE. C.The state of curriculum for secondary students with mild mental retardation. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities39169–1762004
10.
BranstadT.AcostaA.BartlettS.BerdineW.ButterfieldP.ChambersJ.A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their familiesDepartment of EducationWashington, DC2002
11.
BrickB.Thomas JeffersonHoraceMannJohnDeweyChanging concepts of equal educational opportunity: A comparison of the views ofAmerican Educational History Journal32166–1742005
12.
BrownL.McleanM. B.Hamre-NietupskiS.PumpianI.CretoN.GruenewaldL.A strategy for developing chronological age-appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adultsJournal of Special Education1381–901979
13.
CametoR.LevineP.WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.Changes in employment status and job characteristics of out-of-school youth with disabilities. In M. Wagner, L. Newman, R. Cameto, & P. Levine, (Eds.), Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved August 22, 2005, from http://www.nlts2.org/pdfs/str6_ch5.pdf
14.
ClarkG. M.Is a functional curriculum approach compatible with an inclusive education model?Teaching Exceptional Children26236–391994
15.
CornblethC.StanleyW. B.Critical thinking and cognitive processesReview of research in social education 1976 -1983ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies EducationBoulder, CO11–631985
16.
CroninM. E.Life skills curriculum for students with learning disabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities2953–681996
17.
CubanL.Why have American public schools become an arm of the economy?Why is it so hard to get good schools?Teachers College PressNew York5–222003
18.
CurtisC. K.ShaverJ. P.Social studies for at-risk and with disabilitiesHandbook of research on social studies teaching and learningMacmillanNew York345–3561991
19.
DeverR. B.KnapczykD. R.Teaching persons with mental retardation: A model for curriculum development and teachingBrown & BenchmarkMadison, WI1997
20.
DornS.FuchsD.SorrellsA. M.RiethH. J.SindelarP. T.Trends in placement issuesCritical issues in special education: Access, diversity, and accountabilityAllyn & BaconBoston2004
21.
EdgarE.Employment as an outcome for mildly handicapped students: Current status and future directionFocus on Exceptional Children211–81988
22.
EdgarE.PollowayE. A.Education for adolescents with disabilities: Curriculum and placement issuesThe Journal of Special Education27438–4521994
23.
FalveyM.Community-based curriculum: Instructional strategies for students with severe handicapsPaul H. BrookesBaltimore1989
24.
FieldS.LeroyB.RiveraS.Meeting functional curriculum needs in the middle school general education classroomsTeaching Exceptional Children26240–431994
25.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S.Quality indicators for group experimental and quasiexperimental research in special educationExceptional Children71149–1642005
26.
HalpernA. S.BenzM. R.A statewide examination of secondary special education for students with mild disabilities: Implications for the high school curriculumExceptional Children54122–1291987
27.
HanushekE. A.The trade-off between child quantity and qualityJournal of Political Economy10084–1171992
28.
HeynemanS.Education, social cohesion, and the future role of international organizationsPeabody Journal of Education78325–382003
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446 (2004).
31.
KleinertH. L.ThurlowM. L. H. L. Kleinert & J. F. Kearns Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilitiesPaul H. Brookes Publishing CoBaltimore, MD2001An introduction to alternate assessment
32.
KnowltonE.Considerations in the design of personalized curricular supports for students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities3395–1071998
MillerD. R.On your own: A functional skills activity for adolescents with mild disabilitiesTeaching Exceptional ChildrenAuthor2629–321994
35.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and NCTM standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
36.
NietupskiH.Hamre-NietupskiS.CurtinS.ShrikanthK.A review of curricular research in severe disabilities from 1976 to 1995 in six selected journalsThe Journal of Special Education3159–601997
37.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
38.
NoletV.MclaughlinM. J.Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in standards-based reformCorwin Press, IncThousand Oaks, CA2000
39.
PattonJ. R.CroninM. E.BassettD. S.A life skills approach to mathematics instruction: Preparing students with learning disabilities for the real-life math demands of adulthoodJournal of Learning Disabilities30178–1871997
40.
PattonJ. R.CroninM. E.JairrelsV.Curricular implications of transition: Life skills as an integral part of transition educationRemedial and Special Education18294–3061997
41.
PattonJ.PollowayE.CroninM.Social studies instruction for handicapped students: A review of current practicesThe Social Studies78131–1351987
42.
PattonJ. R.PollowayE. A.SmithT. E CEducating students with mild mental retardationFocus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities1580–892000
43.
PattonJ. R.SmithT. E CClarkG. M.PollowayE. A.EdgarE.LeeS.Individuals with mild mental retardation: Postsecondary outcomes and implications for educational policyEducation and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities3175–851996
44.
PollowayE. A.PattonJ. R.SmithJ. D.RoderiqueT. W.Issues in program design for elementary students with mild retardation: Emphasis on curriculum developmentEducation and Training in Mental Retardation26142–1501991
45.
PollowayE. A.SmithJ. D.ChamberlainJ.DenningC. B.SmithT. E CLevels of deficit vs. levels of support in mental retardation classificationEducation and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities24200–2061999
46.
RetishP.HitchingsW.HorvathM.SchmalleB.Students with mild disabilities in the secondary schoolLongmanNew York1991
47.
SabornieE. J.L. U.Teaching students with mild disabilities at the secondary levelOHMerrill1997
48.
SandersW.RiversJ. C.University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment CenterCumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievementKnoxville, TN1996, November
SitlingtonP.FrankA. R.CarsonR.Adult adjustment among high school graduates with mild disabilitiesExceptional Children59221–2331993
51.
SmithT. E CPucciniI. K.Position statement: Secondary curricula and policy issues for students with MR. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities30275–2821995
52.
SnellM. E.Teaching children and young adults with mental retardation in school programs: Current researchBehavior Change1473–1051997
53.
SnellM.BrowderD.SnellM.Systematic instruction of persons with severe handicapsMerrillColumbus, OH390–4341987Domestic and community skills
54.
ThompsonS. J.QuenemoenR. F.ThurlowM. L.YsseldykeJ. E.Alternate assessments for students with disabilitiesCorwin Press, Inc; Council for Exceptional ChildrenThousand Oaks, CA2001
55.
TrybusM. A.Improving student achievement and teacher effectiveness through scientifically based practicesLearning Points Associateshttp://www.ncrel.org/policy/pubs/pdfs/vp11.pdfNaperville, IL112004. April 25. 2007: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory
56.
TurnbullR.HuertaN.StoweM.The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act as Amended in 2004Prentice HallUpper Saddle River, NJ2006
57.
United States Department of EducationFederal Register April 9, 2007 Regulation: Title I - Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA); Final Rule. Retrieved April 25, 2007http://www.education.umn.edu/NCEO/2percentReg/FederalRegApril9TwoPercent.pdf2007
58.
WagnerM.WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.Changes in household arrangements and social activities of out-of-school youth with disabilitiesChanges over time in early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal StudySRI Internationalhttp://www.nlts2.org/pdfs/str6_ch3.pdfMenlo Park, CA2003. August 22. 2005
59.
WagnerM.D'amicoR.JayE.Butler-NatlinP.MarderC.CoxR.What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes for youth with disabilitiesSRI InternationalMenlo Park, CA1992
60.
WeaverR.LandersM. F.AdamsS.Making curriculum functional: Special education and beyondIntervention in School and Clinic26284–2871991
61.
WhitehurstG.The Institute of Education Science: New wine, new bottle. Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Education Research Associationhttp://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/ies.html2003. April. June 22, 2007
62.
YellM. L.DrasgowE.No Child Left Behind: A guide for professionalsPrentice HallUpper Saddle River, NJ2005
63.
YsseldykeJ. E.OlsenK.ThurlowM.University of Minnesota: National Center on Educational OutcomesIssues and considerations in alternate assessmentsMinneapolis1997(Synthesis Report 27
