The focus of this manuscript is on the challenges faced by individuals with developmental and intellectual disabilities within the criminal justice system. Prevalence data are cited and these data are interpreted in light of possible rationales for the disproportionate number of individuals with disabilities present within the system. Then the specific challenges faced by individuals with disabilities are discussed within the context of three key elements of the criminal justice system: interrogation and arrest, prosecution, and sentencing and disposition. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of this information for life skills instruction and transition planning. Specific recommendations are provided in terms of curriculum and instruction as well as community advocacy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderR.CrouchK.HalsteadS.PiachuadJ.Long-term outcome from a medium secure service for people with intellectual disabilityJournal of Intellectual Disability ResearchBoard of Educationhttp://www.en.k12.va.us/go/Sols/historysol50305–3152006. 2001. 2001. February 1, 2007History and social science standards of learning for Virginia public schools
2.
BowkerA.Handle with care: Dealing with offenders who are mentally retardedFBI Law Enforcement Bulletin12–161994, JulyCriminal Justice / 429
3.
BurrR.CecilJ.JamesA.PattonJ. R.PeoplesW.A practitioner's guide to defending capital clients who have mental retardation2002International Justice Project
4.
CroninM. E.PattonJ. R.WoodS. J.Life skills instruction: A practical guide for integrating real-life content into the curriculum at the elementary and secondary levels for students with special needs and who are placed at riskPro-EdAustin, TX2007
5.
DavisL. A.The Arc's justice advocacy guide: An advocate's guide on addicting victims and suspects/ defendants with intellectual disabilitiesThe Arc of the United StatesSilver Spring, MD2006
6.
DershowitzH. L.Jouet-NikinyangM.GillR.LovoiA.Navigating the juvenile justice system: A handbook for juveniles and their familiesTexas AppleseedAustin, TX2004
7.
EdgertonR.The cloak of competenceUniversity of California PressBerkeley, CA1967
8.
EveringtonC.FuleroS. M.Competence to confess: Measuring understanding and suggestibility of mentally retarded offendersMental Retardation37212–2201999
9.
FowlerD.WilenskyM.LovoiA.MongerJ.Opening the door: Justice for defendants with mental retardationTexas AppleseedAustin, TX2005
10.
GlaserW.DeaneK.Normalisation in an abnormal world: A study of prisoners with an intellectual disabilityInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology43338–3561999
11.
GreenspanS.Functional concepts in mental retardation: Finding the natural essence of an artificial categoryExceptionality14205–2242006
12.
GreenspanS.SwitzkyH. N.GreenspanS.Mental retardation in the real world: Why the AAMR definition is not there yetWhat is mental retardation?AAMRWashington, DC167–1852006
13.
GreenspanS.SwitzkyH. N.Execution exemption should be based on actual vulnerability, not disability labelEthics and Behavior1319–262003
14.
GreenspanS.SwitzkyH. N.SwitzkyH. N.GreenspanS.Forty-four years of AAMR manualsWhat is mental retardation? Ideas for an evolving disability in the 21 st centuryAAMRWashington, DC3–282006
15.
HasssanS.GordonR.Simon Fraser University, Criminology Research CentreDevelopmental disability, crime, and criminal justice: A literature reviewBurnaby, CA2003Criminology Research Centre Occasional Paper #2003-01
16.
McgillivrayJ.WatermanB.Knowledge and attitudes of lawyers regarding offenders with intellectual disabilityPsychology, and Law10244–2532003Psychiatry
17.
PattonJ. R.KeyesD. W.Death penalty issues following Atkins. Exceptionality14237–2552006
18.
PerskeR.The police interrogation of persons with mental retardation and other cognitive disabilities. (An abridgement from Unequal justice: What can happen when persons with retardation or other developmental disabilities encounter the criminal justice system)Abingdon PressNashville, TN1991
19.
PerskeR.Deception in the interrogation room: Sometimes tragic for persons with mental retardation and other developmental disabilitiesMental Retardation38532–5372000
20.
PerskeR.Search for persons with intellectual disabilities who confessed to serious crimes they did not commitMental Retardation4358–652005
21.
PerskeR.Gisli Gudjonsson's penchant for corroborationInSight314–162006
22.
PetersiliaJ.California Research Center, University of California, IrvineDoing justice? Criminal offenders with developmental disabilitiesCPRC BriefIrvine, CA124
23.
PetersiliaJ.Disabilities Research Center, University of CaliforniaDoing justice: The criminal justice system and offenders with developmental disabilitiesIrvine, CA; Irvine2000
24.
PollowayE. A.Mild mental retardation: A concept in search of clarity, a profession in search of advocacy, a population in search of appropriate education and supportExceptionality14183–1892006
25.
PollowayE. A.PattonJ. R.SernaL.Strategies for teaching learners with special needsMerrill-Prentice HallColumbus, OH2008th ed.
26.
PraissD. M.Constitutional protection of confessions made by mentally retarded defendantsAmerican Journal of Law and Medicine141989. December 28, 2005
27.
RutherfordR.BullisM.AndersonC. W.Griller-ClarkH. M.Youth with disabilities in the correctional system: Prevalence rates and identification issuesERIC Document Reproduction Service4712002
28.
SmithJ. D.PollowayE. A.Defining disability up and down: 'Normality' and its utilitarian meaning46234–2382008Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
29.
US Department of EducationTwenty-sixth annual report to Congress on IDEAAuthorWashington, DC2006
