Students with autism are increasingly being placed in general education “inclusion” settings for the purpose of improved social integration. This article presents information on the social integration of ten students with autism in elementary inclusive settings. The purposes were to describe three social integration constructs of students with autism in inclusive classrooms, including their acceptance (social preference), visibility (social impact), and membership in a peer group (social network affiliation) and to identify the extent to which severity of autism characteristics contributed to these social integration constructs. Results suggest students with autism in inclusive settings are as accepted, visible, and members of peer groups, as well as both their peers without disabilities and those with other disabilities. Post hoc observations revealed further factors that may impact these constructs as well.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerP. A.KlessS. J.AdlerP.Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girlsSociology of Education65169–1881992
2.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersAuthorWashington, DC1994th ed.
3.
AsherS. R.Coie J. D. Peer Rejection in ChildhoodCambridge University PressCambridge1990
4.
BenderW. N.WyneM. D.StruckG. B.BaileyD. B.Relative peer status of learning disabled, educable mentally handicapped, low achieving, and normally achieving childrenChild Study Journal13209–2161984
5.
BradyM. P.ShoresR. E.McevoyM. A.EllisD.FoxJ.Increasing social interactions of severely handicapped autistic childrenJournal of Autism & Developmental Disorders17375–3901987
6.
BrownL.HammillD. D.Behavior Rating Profile 2nd Ed., Examiner's ManualAustin, TX PRO – ED 1990
7.
BrownL.SherbenouR. J.JohnsonS. K.Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-2Austin, TX PRO – ED 1990
8.
CobenS. S.ZigmondN.The social integration of learning disabled students from self-contained to mainstream elementary school settingsJournal of Learning Disabilities19614–6181986
9.
DiserioT. R.SeraficaF. C.Peer relations of autistic persons: Longitudinal changes, group comparisons, and correlations. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological AssociationWashington, DC1986
10.
FarmerT. W.Social networks and the social behavior of youth with emotional and behavioral disorders: Implications for intervention. B.CJournal of Special Education18223–2341994
11.
FarmerT. W.FarerE. M ZThe social relationships of students with exceptionalities in mainstream classrooms: Social networks and homophilyExceptional Children62431–4501996
12.
Garrison-HarrellL.KampsD. M.KravitsT.The effects of peer networks on socialcommunicative behaviors for students with autismFocus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities12241–2561997
13.
GiangrecoM. F.LuiselliT. E.MacfarlandS. Z CHelping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilitiesExceptional Children647–181997
GottliebB. W.GottliebJ.BerkellD.LevyL.Sociometric status and solitary play of LD boys and girlsJournal of Learning Disabilities19619–6261986
16.
HallL. J.McgregorJ. A.A follow-up study of the peer relationships of children with disabilities in an inclusive schoolThe Journal of Special Education34114–1262000
17.
Hamre-NietupskiS.NietupskiJ.StratheM.Functional life skills, academic skills, and friendship/social relationships development: What do parents of students with moderate/severe/profound disabilities valueJournal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps1753–581992
18.
HendricksonJ. M.Shokoohi-YektaM.Hamre-NietupskiS.GableR. A.Middle and high school students’ perceptions on being friends with peers with severe disabilitiesExceptional Children6319–281996
MarksS. U.SchraderC.LevineM.Pareducator experiences in inclusive settings: Helping or hovering, or holding their own?Exceptional Children65315–3281999
21.
MesibovG. B.ShaeV.Full inclusion and students with autismJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders26337–3461996
22.
MundschenkN. A.SassoG. M.Assessing sufficient social exemplars for students with autism. Behavior Disorders2162–781995
23.
PearlR.FarmerT. W.Van AckerR.RodkinP.BostK. K.CoeM.HenleyW.The social integration of students with mild disabilities in general education classrooms: Peer group membership an peer-assessed social behaviorElementary School Journal99167–1851998
24.
PiercyM.WiltonK.TownsendM.Pro-moting the social acceptance of young children with moderate-severe intellectual disabilities using cooperative-learning techniquesAmerican Journal on Mental Retardation107352–3602002
25.
SabornieE. J.KauffmanJ. M.Regular classroom sociometric status of behaviorally disordered adolescentsBehavioral Disorders13268–2741985
26.
SabornieE. J.KauffmanJ. M.Social acceptance of learning disabled adolescentsLearning Disability Quarterly955–601986
27.
SabornieE. J.KauffmanJ. M.Assigned, received, and reciprocal social status of EMR and nonhandicapped adolescentsEducation and Training in Mental Retardation22139–1491987
28.
SabornieE. J.KauffmanJ. M.EllisE. S.MarshallK. J.ElksninL. K.Bi-directional and cross-categorical social status of learning disabled, behaviorally disordered, and nonhandicapped adolescentsThe Journal of Special Education2139–561987
29.
SabornieE. J.MarshallK. J.EllisE. S.Restructuring of mainstream sociometry with learning disabled and nonhandicapped studentsExceptional Children56314–3231990
30.
ScheuermannB. K.WebberJ. A.Autism: Teaching does make a differenceWadsworthBelmont, CA2002
31.
ShrumW.CheekN. H.HunterS. M.Friendship in school: Gender and racial homophilySociology of Education61227–2391988
32.
Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. Controversial issues confronting special educationAllyn and BaconBoston1992
33.
StiliadisK.WienerJ.Relationship between social perception and peer status in children with learning disabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities22624–6291989
34.
StoneW. L.LagrecaA. M.The social status of children with learning disabilities: A reexaminationJournal of Learning Disabilities2332–371990
35.
WechslerD.Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IIIThe Psychological CorporationSan Antonio, TX1991
