We used a multiple-baseline-across-participants design (Kazdin, 1982) to examine the effects of self-monitoring on selected social and academic behaviors of high school students with mental retardation who were enrolled in general education classes. Target behaviors and self-monitoring strategies were individualized for participants based on input from students and their teachers and parents, students' individualized education program (IEP) goals, and direct observation of students in general education settings. Occurrences of self-monitoring were associated with improvement in target behaviors across participants. In addition, students' teachers and classmates perceived improved performance of target behaviors when students used their self-monitoring strategies. This study adds to the literature as one of few studies investigating self-monitoring by high school students with mental retardation in general education settings.
AgranM., & AlperS. (2000). Curriculum and instruction in general education: Implications for service delivery and teacher preparation. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 167-174.
3.
AgranM., BlanchardC., WehmeyerM. L., & HughesC. (in press). Teaching students to self-regulate their behavior: The differential effects of student- vs. teacher-delivered reinforcement. Research in Developmental Disabilities.
4.
AgranM., SnowK., & SwanerJ. (1999). Teacher perceptions of self-determination: Benefits, characteristics, strategies. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 293-301.
5.
FreaW. D., & HughesC. (1997). Functional analysis and treatment of social communicative behavior of adolescents with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 701-704.
6.
GeeK., GrahamN., SailorW., & GoetzL. (1995). Use of integrated, general education, and community settings as primary contexts for skill instruction for students with severe, multiple disabilities. Behavior Modification, 19, 33-58.
7.
HawkinsR. P. (1991). Is social validity what we are interested in? Argument for a functional approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 205-214.
8.
HughesC., KillianD. J., & FischerG. M. (1996). Validation and assessment of a conversational interaction intervention. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 493-509.
9.
HuntP., AlwellM., GoetzL., & SailorW. (1990). Generalized effects of conversation skill training. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 250-260.
10.
HuntP., & GoetzL. (1997). Research on inclusive educational programs, practices, and outcomes for students with severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 3-29.
11.
HuntP., StaubD., AlwellM., & GoetzL. (1994). Achievement by all students within the context of cooperative learning groups. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 290-231.
12.
JanneyR. E., & SnellM. E. (2000). Modifying school-work. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
13.
JohnsonR. M. (1992). The picture communication symbols book. Stillwater, NM: Mayer-Johnson Co.
14.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
KennedyC. H., ShuklaS., & FryxellD. (1997). Comparing the effects of educational placement on the social relationships of intermediate school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 31-47.
16.
King-SearsM. E. (1999). Teacher and researcher co-design self-management content for an inclusive setting: Research training, intervention, and generalization effects on student performance. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 134-156.
17.
MillerM., MillerS. R., WheelerJ., & SelingerJ. (1989). Can a single-classroom treatment approach change academic performance and behavioral characteristics in severely behaviorally disordered adolescents: An experimental inquiry. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 215-225.
18.
RyndakD. L., DowningJ. E., JacquelineL. R., & MorrisonA. P. (1995). Parents' perceptions after inclusion of their children with moderate or severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 147-157.
19.
WehmeyerM. L., AgranM., & HughesC. (1998). Teaching self-determination to students with disabilities: Basic skills for successful transition. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
20.
WehmeyerM. L., AgranM., & HughesC. (2000). A national survey of teachers' promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 58-68.
21.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
