Staff beliefs about challenging behaviors may influence staff behavior towards those who challenge. Staff behaviors in turn have been implicated in both the development and maintenance of challenging behaviors. Very few previous research studies have focused on staff definitions of challenging behavior. In the present study, 50 staff working with adults with mental retardation rated potentially challenging behaviors in terms of: (a) whether they thought the behaviors were challenging, and (b) whether the behaviors should be the focus of intervention. Results confirmed previous research findings in that behaviors primarily having negative effects on individuals, rather than staff and services, were less likely to be identified as challenging. Practical implications of the study findings and directions for future research on staff beliefs about challenging behavior are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchenbachT. M., & EdelbrockC. S. (1978). The classification of child psychopathology: A review and analysis of empirical efforts. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1275-1301.
2.
AmanM. G., SinghN. N., StewartA. W., & FieldC. J. (1985). The Aberrant Behavior Checklist: A behavior rating scale for the assessment of treatment effects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 485-491.
3.
BerksonG., & TupaM. (2000). Early development of stereotyped and self-injurious behaviors. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 1-19.
4.
EinfeldS. L., & TongeB. J. (1995). The Developmental Behaviour Checklist: The development and validation of an instrument for the assessment of behavioural and emotional disturbance in children and adolescents with mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 81-104.
5.
EmersonE. (1995). Challenging behaviour: Analysis and intervention in people with learning disabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
HallS., OliverC., & MurphyG. (2001). The early development of self-injurious behavior: An empirical study. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 106, 189-199.
7.
HastingsR. P. (1995). Understanding factors that influence staff responses to challenging behaviours: An exploratory interview study. Mental Handicap Research, 8, 296-320.
8.
HastingsR. P. (1997). Staff beliefs about the challenging behaviors of children and adults with mental retardation. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 775-790.
9.
HastingsR. P. (1999). The dialogue between research and application: A focus on practical issues in behavioral intervention. In ScottiJ. R., & MeyerL. H. (Eds.), Behavioral intervention: Principles, models, and practices (pp. 433-448). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
10.
HastingsR. P., & BrownT. (2000). Functional assessment and challenging behaviors: Some future directions. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 229-240.
11.
HastingsR. P., & MountR. H. (2001). Early correlates of behavioural and emotional problems in children and adolescents with severe learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 14, 381-391.
12.
HastingsR. P., & RemingtonB. (1993). Connotations of labels for mental handicap and challenging behaviour: A review and research evaluation. Mental Handicap Research, 6, 237-249.
13.
HastingsR. P., & RemingtonB. (1994). Rules of engagement: Towards an analysis of staff responses to challenging behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 279-298.
14.
HastingsR. P., RemingtonB., & HallM. (1995). Adults' responses to self-injurious behavior: An experimental analysis utilizing a computer simulation paradigm. Behavior Modification, 19, 425-450.
15.
HeymanB., SwainJ., & GillmanM. (1998). A risk management dilemma: How care staff understand challenging behaviour. Disability and Society, 13, 163-182.
16.
KiernanC., & KiernanD. (1994). Challenging behaviour in schools for children with severe learning difficulties. Mental Handicap Research, 7, 171-201.
17.
KlineP. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
18.
LoweK., & FelceD. (1995). How do carers assess the severity of challenging behaviour? A total population study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 39, 117-127.
19.
LoweK., FelceD., & BlackmanD. (1995). People with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour: The characteristics of those referred and not referred to specialist teams. Psychological Medicine, 25, 595-603.
20.
MurphyG. M., HallS., OliverC., & Kissi-DebraR. (1999). Identification of early self-injurious behaviour in young children with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43, 149-163.
21.
OliverC. (1995). Self-injurious behaviour in children with learning disabilities: Recent advances in assessment and intervention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 909-927.
22.
ReeveC. E., & CarrE. G. (2000). Prevention of severe behavior problems in children with developmental disorders. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 144-160.
23.
RojahnJ., PolsterL. M., MulickJ. A., & WisniewskiJ. J. (1989). Reliability of the Behavior Problems Inventory. Journal of the Multihandicapped Person, 2, 283-293.
24.
TaylorJ. C., & CarrE. G. (1992). Severe problem behaviors related to social interaction: II. A systems analysis. Behavior Modification, 16, 336-371.
