Family-centered practices are increasingly being emphasized in team assistive technology planning processes. Professional sensitivity to cultural and family issues during such processes, particularly AAC decision-making, is integral to successful outcomes. This article describes a preliminary information-gathering activity that examined professionals' perceptions of their roles and that of families in the AAC processes. Focus group sessions were conducted with small groups of related service professionals from five states. Transcripts of proceedings were analyzed, and perceptions were organized around five themes: communication style, specific information needs, values, teaming, and implementation/training. Results are discussed in the context of these five themes, and implications for AAC team members are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllaireJ. H., GressardR. P., BlackmanJ. A., & HostlerS. L. (1991). Children with severe speech impairments: Caregiver survey of AAC use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 248–255.
2.
AngeloD. H. (1997). AAC in the family and home. In GlennenS. & DeCosteD. (Eds.), The handbook of augmentative communication (pp. 523–545). San Diego: Singular.
3.
AngeloD. H., JonesS. D., & KokoskaS. M. (1995). A family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 193–201.
4.
BaileyD., & SimeonssonR. (1985). Family needs survey. Chapel Hill: Frank Porter Graham, Child Development Center, University of North Carolina.
5.
BairdS., & PetersonJ. (1997). Seeking a comfortable fit between family-centered philosophy and infant-parent interaction in early intervention: Time for a paradigm shift. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 17, 139–164.
6.
BataviaA. I., & HammerG. (1989). Consumer criteria for evaluating assistive devices: Implications for technology transfer. In PresperinJ. J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America (pp. 194–195). Washington, DC: RESNA Press.
7.
BattleD. E. (1993). Communication disorders in multicultural populations. Boston: Andover Medical Publishers.
8.
BehrmannM. M. (1995). Assistive technology training. In FlippoK. F., IngeK. J., & BarcusJ. M. (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community (pp. 211–222). Baltimore: Brookes.
9.
BogdenR., & BiklenS. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BrothersonM. J., & GoldsteinB. L. (1992). Quality design of focus groups in early childhood special education research. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 334–342.
12.
CobbH. C., & ReeveR. E. (1991). Counseling approaches with parents and families. In FineM. J. (Ed.), Collaboration with parents of exceptional children (pp. 129–143). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing.
13.
CramerS. F. (1998). Collaboration: A success strategy for special educators. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
CulpD. M. (1987). Outcome measurement: The impact of communication augmentation. Seminars in Speech and Language, 8, 169–185.
15.
CulpD. M., AmbrosiD. M., BernigerT. M., & MitchellJ. O. (1986). Augmentative and alternative communication aid use—A followup study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 19–24.
16.
DererK., PolsgroveL., & ReithH. (1996). A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 49–61.
17.
DunstC. J., & PagetK. D. (1991). Parent-professional partnerships and family empowerment. In FineM. J. (Ed.), Collaboration with parents of exceptional children (pp. 25–44). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing.
18.
DunstC., TrivetteC., & DealA. (1994). Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
19.
FishbaughM. S. E. (1997). Models of collaboration. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
GarshelisJ. A., & McConnellS. R. (1993). Comparison of family needs assessed by mothers, individual professionals, and interdisciplinary teams. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 36–49.
21.
GlesneC., & PeshkinA. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
22.
GubaE. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75–92.
23.
HaddadA. (1992). The long-term implications of caring for a ventilator-dependent child at home. Home Healthcare Nurse, 10, 10–11, 57.
24.
HansonM. J., & HanlineM. F. (1990). Parenting a child with a disability: A longitudinal study of parental stress and adaptation. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 234–248.
25.
HarrisL. R. (1994). Issues in school-based intervention. In RattnerV., & HarrisL. (Eds.), Understanding language disorders (pp. 405–445). Eau Claire: Thinking Publications.
26.
HarrisP. (1988). Sometimes pediatric home care doesn't work. American Journal of Nursing, 88, 851–854.
27.
HarryB. (1992). Cultural diversity, families, and the special education system. New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
HourcadeJ. J., ParetteH. P., & HuerM. B. (1997). Family and cultural alert! Considerations in assistive technology assessment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(1), 40–44.
29.
HuerM. B., & LloydL. (1990). AAC users’ perspectives on augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 242–249.
30.
HuerM. B. (1997a). Augmentative and alternative communication. In CroweT. A. (Ed.), Applications of counseling in speech-language pathology and audiology (pp. 335–362). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
31.
HuerM. B. (1997b). Culturally inclusive assessments for children using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). The Journal of Children's Communication Development, 19(1), 23–34.
32.
HuerM. B. (1997c). Looking through color lenses: Cultural strategies for AAC. Advances for Directors in Rehabilitation, 6(6), 37–40.
33.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, P. L. 105-13. (June 4, 1997). 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
34.
IngeK. J., & ShepherdJ. (1995). Assistive technology applications and strategies for school system personnel. In FlippoK. F., IngeK. J., & BarcusJ. M. (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community (pp. 133–166). Baltimore: Brookes.
35.
JohnsonL. J., & MontagueM. J. (1992). Using content analysis to examine the verbal or written communication of stakeholders within early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 73–79.
36.
JudgeS. L., & ParetteH. P. (1998). Assistive technology decision-making strategies. In JudgeS. L., & ParetteH. P. (Eds.), Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
37.
KruegerR. A. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
LuborskyM. R. (1993). Sociocultural factors shaping technology usage. Fulfilling the promise. Technology and Disability, 2, 71–78.
39.
LynchE. W., & HansonM. J. (Eds.). (1992a). Developing cross-cultural competence: A guide for working with young children and their families. Baltimore: Brookes.
40.
LynchE. W., & HansonM. J. (1992b). Steps in the right direction. In LynchE. W., & HansonM. J. (Eds.), Developing cross cultural competence. A guide for working with young children and their families (pp. 355–370). Baltimore: Brookes.
41.
MakasE., MarshallC. A., & WehmanP. (1997). Cultural diversity and disability: Developing respect for differences. In WehmanP. (Ed.), Exceptional individuals in school, community, and work (pp. 83–108). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
42.
MannW. C., & LaneJ. P. (1995). Assistive technology for persons with disabilities. The role of occupational therapy (2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
43.
McGonigelM. J., & GarlandC. W. (1988). The individualized family service plan and the early intervention team: Team and family issues and recommended practices. Infants and Young Children, 1(1), 10–21.
44.
McNaughtonS. (1990). Gaining the most from AAC's growing years. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 2–14.
45.
MunschenckN. A., & FoleyR. M. (1995). Collaborative relationships between school and home: Implications for service delivery. Preventing School Failure, 39(1), 16–20.
46.
MurphyR. (1987). The body silent. New York: Columbia University Press.
47.
NahmiasM. L. (1995). Communication and collaboration between home and school for students with ADD. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 241–247.
48.
ParetteH. P. (1995). Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) assessment and prescriptive practices for young children with disabilities: Preliminary examination of state practices. Technology and Disability, 4, 215–231.
49.
ParetteH. P. (1998). Cultural issues and family-centered assistive technology decision-making. In JudgeS. L., & ParetteH. P. (Eds.), Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services (pp. 184–210). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
50.
ParetteH. P., & AngeloD. H. (1996). Augmentative and alternative communication impact on families: Trends and future directions. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 77–98.
51.
ParetteH. P., & AngeloD. H. (1998). Impact of assistive technology devices on families. In JudgeS. L., & ParetteH. P. (Eds.), Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services (pp. 248–183). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
52.
ParetteH. P., & BrothersonM. J. (1996). Family participation in assistive technology assessment for young children with disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 29–43.
53.
ParetteH. P., BrothersonM. J., & HuerM. B. (2000). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 177–190.
54.
ParetteH. P., & HourcadeJ. J. (1997). Family issues and assistive technology needs: A sampling of state practices. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 27–43.
55.
ParetteH. P., & VanBiervlietA. (1990). A prospective inquiry of the technology needs and practices of school-age children with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 198–206.
56.
ParetteH. P., BrothersonM. J., HogeD. R., & HostetlerS. A. (1996, December). Family-centered augmentative and alternative communication issues: Implications across cultures. Paper presented to the International Early Childhood Conference on Children with Special Needs, Phoenix, AZ.
57.
ParetteH. P., HourcadeJ. J., & VanBiervlietA. (1993). Selection of appropriate technology for children with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25(3), 18–22.
58.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
59.
Roseberry-McKibbinC. (1995). Multicultural students with special language needs. Oceanside, CA: Academic Communication.
60.
RosinP. (1996). Parent and service provider partnerships in early intervention. In RosinP., WhiteheadA. D., TuchmanL. I., JesienG. S., BegunA. L., & IrwinL. (Eds.), Partnerships in family-centered care (pp. 65–79). Baltimore: Brookes.
61.
SextonD., BurrellB., ThompsonB., & SharptonW. R. (1992). Measuring stress in families of children with disabilities. Early Education and Development, 3(1), 60–66.
62.
SimpsonR. L. (1996). Working with parents and families of exceptional children and youth (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
63.
Smith-LewisM. (1992). What is mental retardation? Perceptions from the African American community. Unpublished manuscript. Hunter College, New York.
64.
SotoG., HuerM. B., & TaylorO. (1997). Multicultural issues. In LloydL. L., FullerD. H., & ArvidsonH. H. (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 406–413). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
65.
TeschR. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer Press.
66.
TrivetteC., DealA., & DunstC. (1986). Family needs, sources of support, and professional roles: Critical elements of family systems assessment and intervention. Diagnostique, 11, 246–267.
67.
TurnbullA. P., & TurnbullH. R. (1985). Parents speak out: Then and now. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
68.
TurnbullA. P., SummersJ. A., & BrothersonM. J. (1986). Family life cycle: Theoretical and empirical implication and future directions for families with mentally retarded members. In GallagherJ. J., & VietzeP. (Eds.), Families of handicapped persons: Current research, treatment, and policy issues (pp. 45–65). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
