The purpose of this study was to compare resources and supports expressed as being available and in need of change among 39 teachers with pupils in integrated and segregated school environments in relation to inclusive schooling. Another aim was to compare these perceptions in relation to the rated degree of pupil disability. Results indicate that regardless of educational setting teachers perceived strong needs for regular and ongoing inservice training and access to university courses. Teachers in segregated settings perceived more supports as available than teachers in integrated settings. Higher percentages of teachers in integrated settings reported a greater need for, than availability of supports, mainly within the training and physical resource categories. Teachers of pupils rated as being more disabled perceive needing more contact with other professionals. Recommendations are made in regard to inclusive schooling.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyresB. J., MeyerL. H., ErevellesN., & Parker-LeeS. (1994). Easy for you to say: Teacher perspective on implementing most promising prac-tices. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 84–93.
2.
BaileyD. B., SimeonssonR. J., BuysseV., & SmithT. (1993). Reliability of an index of child charac-teristics. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurol-ogy, 35, 806–815.
3.
BennettT., DelucaD., & BrunsD. (1997). Putting inclusion into practice: Perspectives of teachers and parents. Exceptional Children, 64, 115–131.
4.
Compulsory School Ordinance. (1996). (in Swedish). Gothenburg, Sweden: Förlagshuset Gothia.
5.
Curriculum for the Compulsory School system, pre-school class and after school, Lpo 94. (1998). (in Swedish), Stockholm: Fritzes.
FarrellP. (1997). The integration of children with severe learning difficulties: A review of the recent literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10, 1–14.
8.
FischbeinS., Malmgren HansenA., Westling Al-lodiM., & Roll-PetterssonL. R. (1997). Pupils with special prerequisites and the possibilities for inte-grated and segregated school systems to satisfy their needs (in Swedish). Stockholm: Institute of Edu-cation, Department of Human Development, Learning and Special Education.
9.
FuchsD., & FuchsL. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special edu-cation reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294–309.
10.
GranlundM., Roll-PetterssonL. R., SteensonA-L., & SundinM. (1994). To live and work with young children with disabilities (in Swedish). Stockholm: Stiftelsen ALA.
11.
GranlundM., & KylenA. (1999). Preface. In GranlundM., SteensonA-L., Roll-PetterssonL. R., Björk-ÅkessonE., SundinM., & KylenA. (Eds.), Students with multiple disabilities in the Special Education Program: The effects and effectiveness of education (pp. 11–24; in Swedish). Stockholm: Stiftelsen ALA.
12.
GranlundM., & Roll-PetterssonL. R. (1999). The perceived needs of support of parents and classroom teachers: A comparison of needs in two micro systems. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13.
KauffmanJ. M. (1999). Commentary: Today's spe-cial education and its messages for tomorrow. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 244–254.
14.
Lärarförbundet. (1996). Everybody is entitled to a good education (in Swedish). Stockholm: Lärarförbun-det.
15.
LUK. (1999). To teach and lead: A teacher education for collaboration and development, SOU 1999:63, (in Swedish). Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartement.
16.
PearmanE. L., HaungA. M., & MellblomC. I. (1997). The inclusion of all students: Concerns and incentives of educators. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabil-ities, 32, 11–22.
17.
PerssonB. (1995). Special education in the comprehen-sive school-A study of its prerequisites, practice and direction of action, (in Swedish). Gothenburg: Uni-versity of Gothenburg.
18.
PerssonB. (1998). Special education and differentiation-A study of the use of special educational resources in the comprehensive school, (in Swedish). Gothen-burg: University of Gothenburg.
19.
Roll-PetterssonL. R., GranlundM., & SteénsonA-L. (1999). The perceived needs of advice and support among families and teachers of children who attend the special education school. In GranlundM., SteensonA-L., Roll-PetterssonL. R., Björk-ÅkessonE., SundinM., & KylenA. (Eds.), Stu-dents with multiple disabilities in the Special Education Program: The effects and effectiveness of education (pp. 105–179; in Swedish). Stockholm: Stiftelsen ALA.
20.
SimeonssonR. J., & BaileyD. B. (1991). The ABILITIES Index. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Gra-ham Development Center.
21.
StenhammarA-M., & UlfhielmK., (1998). How do we get what we need? Parents and habilitation person-nel talk about encounters, structures and prerequisites in the Child and Youth Habilitation Center. Stock-holm: Social Styrelsen.
22.
Swedish National Agency for Education. (1997). De-scriptive data on schools. Report 135, (in Swedish). Stockholm: Liber Distribution.
23.
Swedish National Agency for Education. (1998). The school in numbers: Part 2, parents and teacher, Report 148, (in Swedish). Stockholm: Liber Distribution.
24.
Swedish National Agency for Education (1999). Child care and school: A comparison for agencies: Or-ganization-personnel-results. March, Report 165, (in Swedish). Stockholm: Liber Distribution.
25.
TidemanM. (1998). On the border between the Special Education Program and the Regular School. Interviews with parents whose children have been integrated, (in Swedish). Halmstad, Sweden: Wigsfors Institute.
26.
UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement. Spain.
27.
WertsM. G., WoleryM., SnyderE. D., & CaldwellN. K. (1996). Teacher's perceptions of the sup-ports critical to the success of inclusion. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 9–21.
28.
WertsM. G., WoleryM., CaldwellN. K., & Salis-buryC. L. (1996). Supports and resources asso-ciated with inclusive schooling: Perceptions of elementary school teachers about need and avail-ability. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 187–203.
