The comparative validity of different strategies for conducting functional assessments and analyses continues to be an issue for debate among researchers and clinicians. This study compared results from rating scale, structured interview, descriptive observation, and experimental functional analysis approaches to the assessment of the problem behaviors of three young children with autism. The results indicated good agreement across indirect and direct methods. Limitations of the study, as well as implications for research and clinical application were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
2.
ArndorferR. E., MiltenbergerR. G., WosterS. H., RortvedtA. K., & GaffaneyT. (1994). Home-based descriptive and experimental analysis of problem behaviors in children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 64–87.
3.
BelfioreP. J., BrowderD. M., & LinC. H. (1993). Using descriptive and experimental analyses in the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 57–65.
4.
ColeM. L., & BonemM. K. (1999, May). Smoking cessation through functional analysis: A case by case analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago, IL.
5.
ConeJ. D. (1997). Issues in functional analysis in behavioral assessment. Behavior Research and Therapy, 35, 259–275.
6.
CrawfordJ., BrockelB., SchaussS., & MiltenbergerR. G. (1992). A comparison of methods for the functional assessment of stereotypic behavior. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 77–86.
7.
DerbyK. M., WackerD. P., SassoG. M., SteegeM., NorthupJ., CigrandK., & AsmusJ. (1992). Brief functional assessment techniques to evaluate aberrant behavior in an outpatient setting: A summary of 79 cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 713–721.
8.
DurandV. M., & CrimminsD. B. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 18, 99–117.
9.
DurandV. M., & CrimminsD. B. (1992). The Motivation Assessment Scale Administration Guide. Topeka, KS: Monaco & Associates.
10.
FreemanK. A., AndersonC. M., & ScottiJ. R. (2000). A structured descriptive methodology: Increasing agreement between descriptive and experimental analyses. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 55–66.
11.
GohH. L., IwataB. A., & DeLeonI. G. (1996, May). Development and evaluation of the Functional Analysis Screening Tool (FAST). Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco, CA.
12.
GreshamF. M., QuinnM. M., & RestoriA. (1999). Methodological issues in functional analysis: Generalizability to other disability groups. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 180–182.
13.
HardingJ., WackerD. P., CooperL. J., AsmusJ., Jensen-KovalanP., & GrisolanoL. A. (1999). Combining descriptive and experimental analyses of young children with behavior problems in pre-school settings. Behavior Modification, 23, 316–333.
14.
IwataB. A. (1994). Functional analysis methodology: Some closing comments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 413–418.
15.
IwataB. A., DorseyM. F., SliferK. J., BaumanK. E., & RichmanG. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).
16.
IwataB. A., VollmerT. R., & ZarconeJ. R. (1990). The experimental (functional) analysis of behavior disorders: Methodology, applications, and limitations. In ReppA. C., & SinghN. N. (Eds.), Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 301–330). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
17.
IwataB. A., VollmerT. R., ZarconeJ. R., & RodgersT. A. (1993). Treatment classification and selection based on behavioral function. In Van HoutenR., & AxelrodS. (Eds.), Behavior analysis and treatment (pp. 101–125). New York: Plenum.
18.
KahngS. W., IwataB. A., FischerS. M., PageT. J., TreadwellK. R. H., WilliamsD. E., & SmithR. G. (1999). Temporal distributions of problem behavior based on scatter plot analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 593–604.
19.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single-case research designs. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
KernL., & DunlapG. (1999). Assessment-based interventions for children with emotional and behavioral disorders. In ReppA. C., & HornerR. H. (Eds.), Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support (pp. 197–218). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
21.
KratochwillT. R., & McGivernJ. E. (1996). Clinical diagnosis, behavioral assessment, and functional analysis: Examining the connection between assessment and intervention. School Psychology Review, 25, 342–355.
22.
LermanD. C., & IwataB. A. (1993). Descriptive and experimental analyses of variables maintaining behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 293–319.
23.
LewisT. J., ScottT., & SugaiG. (1994). The Problem Behavior Questionnaire: A teacher based instrument to develop functional hypotheses of problem behavior in general education classrooms. Diagnostique, 19, 103–115.
24.
LewisT. J., & SugaiG. (1996). Functional assessment of problem behavior: A pilot investigation of the comparative and interactive effects of teacher and peer social attention on students in general education settings. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 1–19.
25.
MaceF. C., & LalliJ. S. (1991). Linking descriptive and experimental analyses in the treatment of bizarre speech. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 553–562.
26.
NangleD. W., VittimbergaG. L., MiyakeH., HammelD. L., & ScottiJ. R. (1992, May). A comparison of three functional assessment procedures with a child with developmental disabilities. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco, CA.
27.
NelsonJ. R., RobertsM., MathurS. R., & RutherfordR. B. (1999). Has public policy exceeded our knowledge base? A review of the functional behavioral assessment literature. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 169–179.
28.
O'NeillR. E., HornerR. H., AlbinR. W., SpragueJ. R., StoreyK., & NewtonJ. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29.
SassoG. M., ReimersT. M., CooperL. J., WackerD., BergW., SteegeM., KellyL., & AllaireA. (1992). Use of descriptive and experimental analyses to identify the functional properties of aberrant behavior in school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 809–821.
30.
ScottiJ. R., SchulmanD. E., & HojnackiR. M. (1994). Functional analysis and unsuccessful treatment of Tourette's Syndrome in a man with profound mental retardation. Behavior Therapy, 25, 721–738.
31.
SturmeyP. (1995). Analog baselines: A critical review of the methodology. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 269–284.
32.
VollmerT. R., & SmithR. G. (1996). Some current themes in functional analysis research. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17, 229–249.
33.
WackerD. P., CooperL. J., PeckS. M., DerbyK. M., & BergW. K. (1999). Community-based functional assessment. In ReppA. C., & HornerR. H. (Eds.), Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support (pp. 32–56). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34.
WackerD. P., & SteegeM. W. (1993). Providing outclinic services: Evaluating treatment and social validity. In Van HoutenR., & AxelrodS. (Eds.), Behavior analysis and treatment (pp. 297–319). New York: Plenum.
35.
WackerD. P., SteegeM. W., NorthupJ., ReimersT., BergW. K., & SassoG. M. (1990). Use of functional analysis and acceptability measures to assess and treat severe behavior problems. In ReppA. C., & SinghN. N. (Eds.), Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 349–359). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
36.
ZarconeJ. R., RodgersT. A., IwataB. A., RourkeD. A., & DorseyM. F. (1991). Reliability analysis of the Motivation Assessment Scale. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 349–360.
