Responses to the Social Situation Survey were coded into a series of five hierarchical categories based on their sophistication, and data were examined using an IRT Rasch methodology. The analysis for both groups found high levels of item and case fit, showing the strong psychometric characteristics of the research instrument. Comparison between the latent structures of the domain of social problem-solving for the two groups of respondents showed differences in item difficulties of 9 items for respondents with developmental disabilities. Respondents with developmental disabilities found employment related social problems as difficult to effectively solve followed by social skills in the community and in an independent living situation. Suggestions for further research on theoretical aspects of social problem-solving are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrowningP., & NaveG. (1993). Teaching social problem solving to learners with mild disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 309–317.
2.
Chadsey-RuschJ. (1992). Toward defining and measuring social skills in employment settings. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 405–418.
3.
CheneyD., & FossG. (1984). An examination of social behavior of mentally retarded workers. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 19, 215–221.
4.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
5.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
6.
EliasM. J., & ClabbyJ. F. (1994). Building problem-solving skills: Guidelines for a school based program. San Francisco: Josey Bass.
7.
EliasM. J., & TobiaS. E. (1996). Social problem-solving: Interventions in the schools. New York: Guilford.
8.
EngelhardG., & WilsonM. (Eds.). (1997). Objective measurement III: Theory into practice. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9.
FoxC. M., & JonesJ. A. (1998). Uses of Rasch modeling in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 30–45.
10.
GreenspanS., & ShoultzB. (1981). Why mentally retarded adults lose their jobs: Social incompetence as a factor in work adjustment. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 2, 23–38.
11.
GumpelT. (1989, April). Social skills training with mentally retarded adults: A reformulation of a construct. Paper presented at the Council of Exceptional Children, Toronto, Canada.
12.
GumpelT. (1994). Social competence and social skills training for persons with mental retardation: An expansion of a behavioral paradigm. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 29, 194–201.
13.
GumpelT. (1999). An examination of first grade teachers' perceptions of the structure of first-grade readiness. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 285–293.
14.
GumpelT., & FrankR. (1999). An expansion of the peer-tutoring paradigm: Cross-age peer-tutoring of social skills among socially rejected boys. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 115–118.
15.
GumpelT., & WilsonM. (1996). Application of a Rasch analysis to the examination of the perception of facial affect among persons with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17, 161–171.
16.
GumpelT., WilsonM., & ShalevR. (1998). An item response theory analysis of the Conners teacher's rating scale. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 525–32.
17.
HalpernA. S. (1985). Transitions: A look at the foundations. Exceptional Children, 51, 479–486.
18.
LoumidisK. S., & HillA. (1997). Training social problem-solving skills to reduce maladaptive behaviours in intellectual disability groups: The influence of individual difference factors. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10, 217–237.
19.
MartonF. (1981). Phenomenography-Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.
20.
MartonF. (1988). Phenomenography: Exploring different conceptions of reality. In FettermanD. (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education (pp. 176–205). New York: Praeger.
21.
MastersG. (1991). The measurement of conceptual understanding. Unpublished manuscript.
22.
McAlpineC., KendallK. A., & SinghN. N. (1991). Recognition of facial expressions of emotion by persons with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 29–36.
23.
MeichenbaumD., & GoodmanJ. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self-control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 115–126.
24.
NezuC. M., NezuA. M., & AreanP. (1991). Assertiveness and problem-solving training for mildly mentally retarded persons with dual diagnoses. Research and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 371–386.
25.
NietupskiJ., WelchJ., & WackerD. (1983). Acquisition, maintenance, and transfer of grocery item purchasing skills by moderately and severely handicapped students. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 18, 279–286.
26.
O'ReillyM. F., & Chadsey RuschJ. (1992). Teaching a social skills problem-solving approach to workers with mental retardation: An analysis of generalization. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 324–334.
27.
ParkH. S., & Gaylord RossR. (1989). A problem-solving approach to social skills training in employment settings with mentally retarded youth. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 373–380.
28.
SalzbergC. L., AgranM., & Lignugaris/KraftB. (1986). Behaviors that contribute to entry-level employment: A profile of five jobs. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 7, 299–314.
29.
SiegelS., ParkH. S., GumpelT., FordJ., TappeP., & Gaylord RossR. (1990). Research in vocational special education. In Gaylord-RossR. (Ed.), Issues and research in special education, Vol. 1. Teachers College Press Special Education Series (pp. 173–242). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
30.
SpivackG., PlattJ. J., & ShureM. B. (1976). The problem-solving approach to adjustment: A guide to research and intervention. San Francisco: Josey Bass.
31.
SpivackG., & ShureM. B. (1974). Social adjustment of young children: A cognitive approach to solving real-life problems. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
32.
StoreyK., & Gaylord RossR. (1987). Increasing positive social interactions by handicapped individuals during a recreational activity using a multicomponent treatment package. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 627–649.
33.
StoreyK., RhodesL., SandowD., LoewingerH., & PetherbridgeR. (1991). Direct observation of social interactions in a supported employment setting. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 53–63.
34.
SvenssonL., & ThemanJ. (1983). The relation between categories of description and an interview protocol in a case of phenomenographic research. Pittsburgh, PA: Annual Human Science Research Conference.
35.
TaylorA. R., AsherS. R., & WilliamsG. A. (1987). The social adaptation of mainstreamed mildly retarded children. Child Development, 58, 1321–1334.
36.
ThompsonB. (1989). Statistical significance, result importance, and result generalizability: Three noteworthy but somewhat different issues. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 2–6.
37.
ThorndikeR. L. (1982). Applied Psychometrics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
38.
WehmeyerM. L., & KelchnerK. (1994). Interpersonal cognitive problem-solving skills of individuals with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 29, 265–278.
39.
WrightB. D., & MastersG. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.
