Abstract
Accurate temperature monitoring is essential for detecting perioperative hypothermia during spinal anesthesia, where rapid redistribution of body heat commonly occurs. Although zero-heat-flux (ZHF) thermometry has emerged as a noninvasive method for estimating core temperature, the reliability of chest skin temperature monitoring in this context remains unclear. In this prospective observational study, temperature measurements were obtained at 5-minute intervals using a forehead ZHF sensor, an infrared tympanic thermometer, and a non-axillary chest skin probe in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. Agreement between methods was evaluated using Bland—Altman analysis for repeated measurements, the proportion of paired measurements within ±0.5°C, and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient. Ninety-nine patients completed the study. ZHF and tympanic temperatures showed good agreement, with a mean difference of 0.04 ± 0.35°C, limits of agreement from −0.63°C to 0.72°C, and 89% of paired measurements within ±0.5°C. In contrast, chest skin temperature demonstrated poor agreement with both ZHF and tympanic measurements. The mean difference between ZHF and chest skin temperature was 0.99 ± 1.11°C, with wide limits of agreement (−1.18°C to 3.17°C), and no measurements met the predefined ±0.5°C threshold. Similar discrepancies were observed when chest skin temperature was compared directly with tympanic temperature. These findings indicate that non-axillary chest skin temperature does not reliably reflect core temperature during redistribution hypothermia under spinal anesthesia and should not be used as a surrogate. ZHF thermometry showed substantially better agreement with tympanic temperature and may provide a more reliable noninvasive alternative for perioperative temperature monitoring.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
