Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The overwhelming incarceration and recidivism rates in the United States marked by pronounced extralegal disparities are recognized social burdens that continue to require attention. Despite the number of people affected by the jail system and its unique role in the criminal justice system, much of the literature about recidivism and disparities focuses on former prison inmates. Using focal concerns perspective as a theoretical underpinning, this study examined the impact of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on the likelihood of recidivism from a local jail in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. Results of the study suggested that significant disparities existed in the likelihood of jail recidivism, with non-Hispanic Blacks, males, and younger individuals having the highest odds of receiving a subsequent charge. When race, ethnicity, and gender interactions were considered, it was found that the racial/ethnic effect was driven by non-Hispanic Black males’ likelihood to recidivate within 12-months of release. Age interactions further indicated that younger non-Hispanic Black males were the most disadvantaged group. Policy implications and future research are discussed throughout the paper.

Keywords

jail recidivism racial disparities gender disparities age disparities focal concerns perspective

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Community Survey. (2022). American community survey data, 2022. United States Census Bureau.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Anderson Publishing Co.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(1998). Level of service inventory–revised: Screening version. Multi-Health Systems.

Bayer

J. T.

(2017). Wisconsin F.A.Q.’s. Milwaukee: Wisconsin OWI attorney. Retrieved from http://owilawyerwisconsin.com/faqs/

Beck

A. J.

(2006). The importance of successful reentry to jail population growth. Urban Institute Jail Reentry Roundtable.

Bowers

(2008). Contraindicated drug courts. UCLA Law Review, 55, 783–835.

Brennan

Dieterich

Ehret

(2009). Evaluating the predictive validity of the COMPAS risk and needs assessment system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808326545

Brennan

Spohn

(2009). The joint effects of offender race/ethnicity and sex on sentence length decisions in federal courts. Race and Social Problems, 1, 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-009-9016-0

Bridges

G. S.

Steen

(1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657267

10.

Caudy

M. S.

Tillyer

M. S.

Tillyer

(2018). Jail versus probation: A gender-specific test of differential effectiveness and moderators of sanction effects. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(7), 949–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818766375

11.

Clark-Moorman

Velazquez

(2023). Racial disparities persist in many U.S. jails. The Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2023/05/racial-disparities-persist-in-many-us-jails

12.

Clark

(2010). Milwaukee county jail population analysis. Pretrial Justice Institute.

13.

Comcentia. (2025). Government. Comcentia.com. Retrieved from https://comcentia.com/government/

14.

Crayton

Ressler

Mukamal

D. A.

Jannetta

Warwick

(2010). Partnering with jails to improve reentry: A guidebook for community-based organizations. Urban Institute.

15.

Dietz

(2018). Wisconsin Department of Corrections 2017 annual report. Department of Corrections.

16.

Durose

M. R.

Antenangeli

(2021). Recidivism of prisoners released in 34 states in 2012: A 5-year follow-up period (2012–2017). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

17.

Durose

M. R.

Cooper

A. D.

Synder

H. N.

(2014). Recidivism for prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010 (NCJ 244205, Special report). Bureau of Justice Statistics.

18.

Faber

Fonseca

L. M.

(2014). How sample size influences research outcomes. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 19(4), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.027-029.ebo

19.

Folk

J. B.

Stuewig

J. B.

Blasko

B. L.

Caudy

Martinez

A. G.

Maass

Taxman

F. S.

Tangney

J. P.

(2018). Do demographic factors moderate how well criminal thinking predicts recidivism? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(7), 2045–2062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17694405

20.

Freiburger

T. L.

Sheeran

A. M.

(2017). The joint effects of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on the incarceration and sentence length decisions. Race and Justice, 10(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368717739676

21.

Freudenberg

Daniels

Crum

Perkins

Richie

B. E.

(2005). Coming home from jail: The social and health consequences of community reentry for women, male adolescents, and their families and communities. American Journal of Public Health, 95(10), 1725–1736. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.056325

22.

Fritsche

S. P.

(2019). Neighborhood ecology and recidivism: A case study in NYC. CUNY Academic Works.

23.

Gendreau

Little

Goggin

(1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34, 575–607.

24.

Ghavami

Peplau

L. A.

(2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes testing three hypothesis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312464203

25.

Hawkins

D. F.

(1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 2, 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1981.9967554

26.

Henken

(2011). Milwaukee County detainee populations at historic lows: Why is it happening and what does it mean? Public Policy Forum, 99(5), 1–11.

27.

Holton

(2014). CJC recidivism case study and process protocol development summary. Milwaukee Community Justice Council.

28.

Holzer

H. J.

Raphael

Stoll

M. A.

(2003). Employment barriers facing ex-offenders. Urban Institute.

29.

Janetta

(2009). Assembling the jail reentry puzzle. American Jails, 9–18.

30.

Jung

Spjeldnes

Yamatani

(2010). Recidivism and survival time: Racial disparity among former jail inmates. Social Work Research, 34(3), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/34.3.181

31.

Kramer

J. H.

Ulmer

J. T.

(2009). Sentencing guidelines: Lessons from Pennsylvania. Lynne Rienner.

32.

Levine

M. V.

(2019). Milwaukee 53206: The anatomy of concentrated disadvantage in an inner city neighborhood, 2000–2017. Center for Economic Development Publications.

33.

Lyman

M. A.

(2017). House of correction recidivism report 2015 and 2013 releases. Hampden County. Hampden County Sheriff’s Department.

34.

Lyman

LoBuglio

(2006). “Whys” and “hows” of measuring jail recidivism. Urban Institute.

35.

Lyttleton

(2021). Recidivism rates for Black men in the US prison system are higher than all other groups. The Mil Source, Geopolitics.

36.

Mellow

Mukamal

D. A.

LoBuglio

S. F.

Solomon

A. L.

Osborne

J. W. L.

(2008). The jail administrator’s toolkit for reentry. The Urban Institute.

37.

Minton

T. D.

Golinelli

(2014). Jail inmates at midyear 2013 [NCJ 245350]. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

38.

Minton

T. D.

Zeng

(2015). Jail inmates at midyear 2014 [NCJ 248629]. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

39.

Minton

T. D.

Zeng

(2016). Jail inmates in 2015 [NCJ 250394]. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

40.

Office of African American Affairs. (2025). Office of African American affairs. Office of African American Affairs. Retrieved from https://city.milwaukee.gov/Office-of-African-American-Affairs

41.

Olson

D. E.

(2011). Characteristics of inmates in the cook county jail. Loyola University.

42.

The Pew Charitable Trusts. (2023). Racial disparities persist in many U.S. jails. The Pew Charitable Trusts.

43.

Prison Policy Initiative. (2024). United States profile. Prison Policy Initiative. Retrieved from https://www.prisonpolicy.org/profiles/US.html

44.

ProPhoenix. (2019). Phoenix CMS: Corrections management software. ProPhoenix, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.prophoenix.com/solutions-cms/

45.

Reisig

M. D.

Bales

W. D.

Hay

Xia

(2007). The effect of racial inequality on black male recidivsim. Justice Quarterly, 24, 408–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701485387

46.

Rempel

Lambson

S. H.

Picard-Fritsche

Adler

Reich

W. A.

(2018). Understanding risk and needs in misdemeanor populations: A case study in New York City. Center for Court Innovation.

47.

Rios

(2011). Punished: Policing the lives of black and Latino boys. New York University Press.

48.

Ropes Berry

Kennedy

S. C.

Lloyd

Veeh

C. A.

Tripodi

S. J.

(2018). The intersectional effects of race and gender on time to reincarceration. Justice Quarterly, 37(1), 132–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1524508

49.

Sawyer

Wagner

(2019). Mass incarceration: The whole pie 2019. Prison Policy Initiative. Retrieved from https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2019.html

50.

Singh

J. P.

Fazel

(2010). Forensic risk assessment: A metareview. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(9), 965–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810374274

51.

Solomon

A. L.

Osborne

J. W. L.

LoBuglio

S. F.

Mellow

Mukamal

D. A.

(2008). Life after lockup: Improving reentry from jail to the community. Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.

52.

Spohn

Holleran

(2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281–306.

53.

Stahler

G. J.

Mennis

Belenko

Welsh

W. N.

Hiller

M. L.

(2013). Predicting recidivism for released state prison offenders: Examining the influence of individual and neighborhood characteristics and spatial contagion on the likelihood of reincarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(6), 690–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812469609

54.

Steen

Engen

Gainey

(2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435–468.

55.

Steffensmeier

(1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime & Delinquency, 26, 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112878002600305

56.

Steffensmeier

Demuth

(2006). Does gender modify the effects of race–ethnicity on criminal sanctions? Sentences for male and female, White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-006-9010-2

57.

Steffensmeier

Kramer

Streifel

(1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411–446.

58.

Steffensmeier

Painter-Davis

Ulmer

(2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Race, Ethnicity, and Social Policy, 60(4), 810–833.

59.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

Kramer

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–798.

60.

Subramanian

Delaney

Roberts

Fishman

McGarry

(2015). Incarceration’s front door: The misuse of jails in America. Vera Institute of Justice.

61.

Tatar

J. R.

Jones

(2016). Recidivism after release from prison. Department of Corrections.

62.

Toobin

(2015). The Milwaukee experiment: What can one prosecutor do about the mass incarceration of African-Americans? The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/05/11/the-milwaukee-experiment

63.

Turney

Conner

(2019). Jail incarceration: A common and consequential form of criminal justice contact. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024601

64.

Urban Milwaukee. (2024). Milwaukee County to receive funding to address homelessness and incarceration. Retrieved from https://county.milwaukee.gov/EN/County-Executive/News/Press-Releases/Milwaukee-County-To-Receive-Funding-To-Address-Homelessness-and-Incarceration

65.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). U.S. Census Bureau quickfacts: Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/milwaukeecountywisconsin

66.

Vera Institute of Justice. (2019). Annual report 2019: A vision for change. Vera Institute of Justice. Retrieved from annual-report-2019-v3.pdf.

67.

Verheek

A. G.

(2015). Missing pieces: How neighborhood health context influences jail reentry. Western Michigan University. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/545

68.

Wagner

Rabuy

(2017). Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2017. Northampton. Prison Policy Initiative.

69.

Weller

(2012). A look at jail-based reentry programs. University of Central Florida.

70.

Wisconsin Court System. (2012). Wisconsin circuit court access. Retrieved April 22, 2019, from https://wcca.wicourts.gov/

71.

Wisconsin Department of Corrections. (2021). Recidivism after release from prison. Wisconsin Department of Corrections.

72.

Yamatani

(2008). Overview report of Allegheny county jail collaborative evaluation findings. Center on Race and Social Problems School of Social Work University of Pittsburgh.

73.

Zeng

(2018). Jail inmates in 2016. [NCJ 251210]. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

74.

Zeng

(2023). Jail inmates in 2022. [NCJ 307086]. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

The Joint Effects of Race,Ethnicity,Gender,and Age on the Likelihood of Recidivism from a Local Jail

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References