Research seeking to test racial invariance in neighborhood violence emphasizes concentrated disadvantage despite the problem of “restricted distributions.” We investigate whether spatial polarization of disadvantage and affluence accounts for racial differences when there are few extremely poor, white neighborhoods for comparison. Drawing on data for Atlanta, GA neighborhoods (N = 314), the analysis evaluates the racial invariance thesis by assessing (1) whether racial/ethnic differences in neighborhood violence are better explained by the index of concentration at the extremes (ICE) than alternative socioeconomic measures, and (2) whether it exerts expected effects on violent crime in white, black, and mixed-race neighborhoods. Findings reveal that heightened violence in black and mixed-race neighborhoods (relative to white) is fully explained by the ICE index, but not by concentrated disadvantage or within-neighborhood inequality (GINI). Theoretically expected effects of the ICE index on violent crime across white, black, and mixed-race neighborhoods are also evident.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaR.LoganJ. R. (1991). Variations on two themes: Racial and ethnic patterns in the attainment of suburban residence. Demography, 28(3), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061466
2.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
3.
BeckE. M.TolnayS. E. (1990). The killing fields of the Deep South: The market for cotton and the lynching of Blacks, 1882–1930. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095805
4.
BeckE. M.TolnayS. E. (1995). A festival of violence: An analysis of Southern lynchings, 1882–1930. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
5.
BellairP. E. (1997). Social interaction and community crime: Examining the importance of neighbor networks. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 35(4), 677–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb01235.x
BellairP. E.McNultyT. L.RoscignoV. J.LeiM. K. (2021). Childhood material hardship and externalizing behavior. Justice Quarterly, 38(3), 454–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1584326
8.
BischoffK.ReardonS. F. (2014). Residential segregation by income, 1970–2009. In LoganJ. R. (Ed.), Diversity and Disparities: America Enters a New Century (pp. 208–233). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
BlauJ. R.BlauP. M. (1982). The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review, 47(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095046
10.
BrowningC. R.CagneyK. A. (2003). Moving beyond poverty: Neighborhood structure, social processes, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(4), 552–571. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519799
11.
CarpianoR. M.LloydJ. E. V.HertzmanC. (2009). Concentrated affluence, concentrated disadvantage, and children’s readiness for school: A population-based, multi-level investigation. Social Science and Medicine, 69(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.028
12.
ChambersB. D.BaerR. J.McLemoreM. R.Jelliffe-PawlowskiL. L. (2019). Using the index of concentration at the extremes as indicators of structural racism to evaluate the association with preterm birth and infant mortality - California, 2011–2012. Journal of Urban Health, 96(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0272-4
13.
DanzigerS. (1996). Comment on “The age of extremes: Concentrated affluence and poverty in the twenty-first century”. Demography, 33(4), 413–416. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061774
14.
DorfmanR. (1979). A formula for the GINI coefficient. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(1), 146–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924845
15.
FeldmeyerB.SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ. T. (2013). Racial/ethnic composition and violence: Size of place variations in percent Black and percent Latino effects on violence rates. Sociological Forum, 28(4), 811–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12058
16.
HernandezA. A.VelezM. B.LyonsC. J. (2018). The racial invariance thesis and neighborhood crime: Beyond the Black–White divide. Race and Justice, 8(3), 216–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368716669986
17.
HippJ. R. (2007). Income inequality, race, and place: Does the distribution of race and class within neighborhoods affect crime rates?Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 45(3), 665–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00088.x
18.
HunterA. (1985). Private, parochial, and public social orders: The problem of crime and incivility in urban communities. In SuttlesG.ZaldM. (Eds.), The challenge of social control: Citizenship and institution building in modern society (pp. 230–242). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19.
KarlsonK. B.HolmA.BreenR. (2012). Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using Logit and Probit: A new method. Sociological Methodology, 42(1), 286–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175012444861
KriegerN.FeldmanJ. M.WatermanP. D.ChenJ. T.CoullB. A.HemenwayD. (2017). Local residential segregation matters: Stronger association of census tract compared to conventional city-level measures with fatal and non-fatal assaults (total and firearm related), using the index of concentration at the extremes (ICE) for racial, economic, and racialized economic segregation, massachusetts (US), 1995–2010. Journal of Urban Health, 94(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-016-0116-z
22.
KrivoL. J.LyonsC. J.VelezM. B. (2021). The U.S. racial structure and ethno-racial inequality in urban neighborhood crime, 2010–2013. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 7(3), 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649220948551
23.
KrivoL. J.PetersonR. D. (1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Social Forces, 75(2), 619–648. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580416
24.
KrivoL. J.PetersonR. D. (2000). The structural context of homicide: Accounting for racial differences in process. American Sociological Review, 65(4), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657382
25.
KrivoL. J.PetersonR. D.KuhlD. C. (2009). Segregation, racial structure, and neighborhood violent crime. American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), 1765–1802. https://doi.org/10.1086/597285
26.
LaurenceJ. (2015). Community disadvantage and race-specific rates of violent crime: An investigation into the “racial invariance” hypothesis in the United Kingdom. Deviant Behavior, 36(12), 974–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.982749
27.
LauritsenJ.HeimerK.LangJ. B. (2018). The enduring significance of race and ethnic disparities in male violent victimization: An analysis of NCVS micro-data, 1973–2010. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 15(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X18000097
28.
LevyB. L.PhillipsN. E.SampsonR. J. (2020). Triple disadvantage: Neighborhood Networks of everyday urban mobility and violence in U.S. cities. American Sociological Review, 85(6), 925–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420972323
29.
LightM. T.ThomasJ. T. (2019). Segregation and violence reconsidered: Do White’s benefit from residential segregation?American Sociological Review, 84(4), 690–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419858731
30.
LightM. T.UlmerJ. T. (2016). Explaining the gaps in White, Black, and Hispanic Violence since 1990: Accounting for immigration, incarceration, and inequality. American Sociological Review, 81(2), 290–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416635667
31.
LoganJ. R.AlbaR. (1993). Locational returns to human capital: Minority access to suburban community resources. Demography, 30(2), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061840
32.
LoganJ. R.MolotchH. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. University of California Press.
33.
MasseyD. S. (1996). The age of extremes: Concentrated affluence and poverty in the twenty-first century. Demography, 33(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061773
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
36.
MasseyD. S.EggersM. L. (1993). The spatial concentration of affluence and poverty during the 1970s. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 29(2), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208169302900206
37.
McNultyT. L. (2001). Assessing the race-violence relationship at the macro level: The assumption of racial invariance and the problem of restricted distributions. Criminology, 39(2), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00930.x
MertonR. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: The Free Press.
40.
MorenoffJ. D.SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 39(3), 517–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00932.x
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2010). Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial spatial divide. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
44.
SampsonR. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
45.
SampsonR. J.BartuschD. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review, 32(4), 777–804. https://doi.org/10.2307/827739
46.
SampsonR. J.BeanL. (2006). Cultural mechanisms and killing fields: A revised theory of community-level racial inequality. In PetersonR.KrivoL.HaganJ. (Eds.), The many colors of crime (pp. 8–36). New York University Press.
47.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. R.RaudenbushS. W. (2005). Social Anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. American Journal of Public Health, 95(2), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.037705
48.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918
49.
SampsonR. J.WilsonW. J. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In HaganJ.PetersonR. D. (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 37–54). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50.
SampsonR. J.WilsonW. J.KatzH. (2018). Reassessing toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality: Enduring and new challenges in 21st century America. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 15(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X18000140
51.
SampsonR. J.WinterA. S. (2018). Poisoned development: Assessing childhood lead exposure as a cause of crime in a birth cohort followed through adolescence. Criminology, 56(2), 269–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12171
52.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, IL.: University of Chicago Press.
53.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1949). Rejoinder. American Sociological Review, 14(5), 608–617.
54.
ShihadehE. S.ShrumW. (2004). Serious crime in urban neighborhoods: Is there a race effect?Sociological Spectrum, 24(4), 507–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170490459502
SquiresG. D.KubrinC. E. (2006). Privileged places: Race, residence, and the structure of opportunity. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
57.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ. T.FeldmeyerB.HarrisC. T. (2010). Scope and conceptual issues in testing the race-crime invariance thesis: Black, White and Hispanic comparisons. Criminology, 48(4), 1133–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00214.x
58.
TorresS. A. (2020). Vulnerable to disparity? The imperfect alignment of neighborhood relative inequality with the Racial Invariance Thesis. Justice Quarterly, 37(5), 763–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1675745
59.
UnneverJ. D. (2019). The racial invariance thesis in criminology: Toward a Black criminology. in UnneverJ. D.GabbidonS. L.ChouhyC. (Eds.), Building a black criminology: Race, theory, and crime (pp. 77–100). New York, NY: Routledge.
60.
UnneverJ. D.BarnesJ. C.CullenF. T. (2016). The racial invariance thesis revisited: Testing an African American theory of offending. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986215607254
61.
VelezM. B.KrivoL. J.PetersonR. D. (2003). Structural inequality and homicide: An assessment of the Black-White gap in killings. Criminology, 41(3), 645–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01000.x
62.
VelezM. B.LyonsC. J.BoursawB. (2012). Assessing the relationship between mortgage lending and crime: An analysis of Seattle neighborhoods (1981–2007). Criminology, 50(4), 1025–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00287.x
63.
VelezM. B.RichardsonK. (2012). The political economy of neighborhood homicide in Chicago: The role of bank investment. British Journal of Criminology, 52(3), 490–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azr092
64.
WilsonW. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65.
WilsonW. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York, NY: Random House.
