Home loans are associated with fewer crimes in neighborhoods and some research shows investment may be especially helpful in disadvantaged or minority neighborhoods. To replicate and extend this research, we estimate a series of multilevel negative binomial models on crime to (1) replicate prior research, (2) examine the robustness of extant findings to variable specification, and (3) expand on prior work by examining the conditional role of residential instability. In line with prior work, our results show that tracts receiving larger absolute and relative loan amounts experience fewer violent crimes. However, the magnitude of crime-reduction benefits of investment are attenuated when including aggravated assaults or accounting for the relative value of the loans. Though investment was associated with lower violent crime in all types of tracts, disproportionate benefits of investment—that is, more bang for the buck—occurs more consistently in White tracts than tracts of color. These findings underscore the importance of replication for ensuring sound housing and anti-crime policies.
BoggessL. N.ChamberlainA. W. (2021). Investing in neighborhoods: The mitigating role of home mortgage loans on intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence36(23–24), NP12783–NP12806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519900312
2.
BoggessL. N.HippJ. R. (2010). Violent crime, residential instability and mobility: Does the relationship differ in minority neighborhoods?. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(3), 351–370.
3.
BoggessL. N.HippJ. R. (2016). The spatial dimensions of gentrification and the consequences for neighborhood crime. Justice Quarterly, 33(4), 584–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.943799
4.
BranicN.HippJ. R. (2018). Growing pains or appreciable gains? Latent classes of neighborhood change, and consequences for crime in southern California neighborhoods. Social Science Research, 76, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.08.002
5.
BrowningC. R.ByronR. A.CalderC. A.KrivoL. J.KwanM. P.LeeJ. Y.PetersonR. D. (2010). Commercial density, residential concentration, and crime: Land use patterns and violence in neighborhood context. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 329–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810365906
6.
BuntingW. C. (2020). Does increased access to home mortgage money reduce local crime rates? Evidence from San Diego County. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 84, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103570
7.
BursikR. J.GrasmickH. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lexington Books.
8.
ChamberlainA. W.HippJ. R. (2015). It’s all relative: Concentrated disadvantage. Within and across neighborhoods and communities, and the consequences for neighborhood crime. Journal of Criminal Justice43(6), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.08.004
9.
ChamberlainA. W.WallaceD.PfeifferD.GaubJ. (2018). Housing disinvestment and crime in a phoenix suburb: Exploring the differential effects of investors and owner-occupants. Urban Affairs Review, 54(1), 190–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416640126
10.
DietzR. D.HaurinD. R. (2003). The social and private micro-level consequences of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 54(3), 401–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00080-9
11.
EllenI. G.O’ReganK. (2010). Crime and urban flight revisited: The effect of the 1990s drop in crime on cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 68(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.05.002
FaberJ. W.EllenI. G. (2016). Race and the housing cycle: Differences in home equity trends among long-term homeowners. Housing Policy Debate, 26(3), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2015.1128959
14.
GalsterG. C. (1987). Homeowners and Neighborhood Reinvestment. Duke University Press.
15.
GardnerW.MulveyE. P.ShawE. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.392
16.
GillL.M.BoggessL. NChamberlainA. W. (2022). Neighborhood fixer uppers: Do home improvement loans influence crime across race and over time?American Journal of Criminal Justice, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103–022-09679-4
17.
HarrisC. T.FeldmeyerB. (2013). Latino immigration and White, Black, and Latino violent crime: A comparison of traditional and non-traditional immigrant destinations. Social Science Research, 42(1), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.08.014
18.
HaurinD. R.DietzR. D.WeinbergB. A. (2013). The impact of neighborhood homeownership rates: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Housing Policy Debate, 13(2), 119–151. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44944780
19.
HippJ. R.TitaG. E.GreenbaumR. T. (2009). Drive-bys and trade-ups: Examining the directionality of the crime and residential instability relationship. Social Forces, 87(4), 1777–1812. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40344999
JohnsonL. T. (2021). Modeling urban neighborhood violence: The systemic model and variable effects of social structure. Urban Affairs Review, 57(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419844018
22.
KasardaJ. D.JanowitzM. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39(3), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094293
23.
LoganJ. R.MolotchH. L. (2007). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Univ of California Press.
24.
MallachA. (2019). Over the edge: Trajectories of African American middle neighborhoods in St. Louis since 2000. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(7), 1063–1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1607747
25.
MarkleyS. N.HafleyT. J.AllumsC. A.HollowayS. R.ChungH. C. (2020). The limits of homeownership: Racial capitalism, Black wealth, and the appreciation gap in Atlanta. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(2), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijur.v44.2
26.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579183
27.
McCabeB. J. (2013). Are homeowners better citizens? Homeownership and community participation in the United States. Social Forces, 91, 929–954. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos185
28.
MizeT. D. (2019). Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociological Science, 6, 81–117. https://doi.org/10.15195/v6.a4
29.
MorenoffJ. D.SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 517–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00932.x
OsgoodD. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007521427059
32.
PapachristosA. V.SmithC. M.SchererM. L.FugieroM. A. (2011). More coffee, less crime? The relationship between gentrification and neighborhood crime rates in Chicago, 1991 to 2005. City & Community, 10(3), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01371.x
33.
PerryA. M. (2020). Know your price: Valuing Black lives and property in America’s Black cities. Brookings Institution Press.
34.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2010a). Divergent social worlds: neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. Russell Sage.
35.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2010b). National neighborhood crime study (NNCS), 2000[Computer file]. ICPSR27501–v1. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR [distributor], 2010–05–05.
36.
RoheW. M.StegmanM. A. (1994). The impact of home ownership on the social and political involvement of low-income people. Urban Affairs Review, 30(1), 152–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208169403000108
RoheW. M.Van ZandtS.McCarthyG. (2002). Social Benefits and costs of homeownership. In: RetsinasN. P.BelskyE. S.. Low-income homeownership: examining the unexamined goal, Brookings Institution Press. Harvard University.
39.
RothsteinR. (2017). The color of law: a forgotten history of how our government segregated America. : Liveright.
40.
RutanD. Q.GlassM. R. (2018). The lingering effects of neighborhood appraisal: Evaluating redlining’s legacy in Pittsburgh. The Professional Geographer, 70(3), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1371610
41.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918
42.
SaporuD.PattonC. LIIIKrivoL. JPetersonR. D. (2011). Differential benefits? Crime and community investments in racially distinct neighborhoods. Race and Justice1(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368710396381
43.
ShriderE. A.RameyD. M. (2018). Priming the pump: Public investment, private mortgage investment, and violent crime. City & Community, 17(4), 996–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.1234
SouthE. C.MacDonaldJ.ReinaV. (2021). Association between structural housing repairs for low-income homeowners and neighborhood crime. JAMA Network Open, 4(7), e2117067.
46.
SquiresG. D. (ed.). (1992). From redlining to reinvestment: Community responses to urban disinvestment. Temple University Press.
47.
SquiresG. D.KubrinC. E. (2006). Privileged places: Race, residence, and the structure of opportunity. Lynne Rienner.
48.
SquiresG. D.O’ConnerS. (2001). Color and money: Politics and prospects for community reinvestment in urban American. State University of New York Press.
StuckyT. D.OttensmannJ. R.PaytonS. B. (2012). The effect of foreclosures on crime in Indianapolis, 2003–2008. Social Science Quarterly, 93(3), 602–624. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42864089
51.
ThomasS. A.DrawveG. (2018). Examining interactive effects of characteristics of the social and physical environment on aggravated assault. Journal of Criminal Justice, 57, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.04.002
52.
VélezM. B. (2009). Banks and the racial patterning of homicide: A study of Chicago neighborhoods. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 3(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2783
53.
VélezM. B.LyonsC.BoursawB. (2012). Assessing the relationship between mortgage lending and crime: An analysis of Seattle neighborhoods (1981–2007). Criminology, 50(4), 1025–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00287.x
54.
VélezM. B.RichardsonK. (2012). The political economy of neighborhood homicide in Chicago: The role of bank investment. British Journal of Criminology, 52(3), 490–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azr092
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
