Latinos have been remarkably absent from research on the degree to which citizens notify police about violent crimes. This article takes a few small steps toward filling this knowledge gap through a case study of Mexican American youth in Little Village, the largest Mexican neighborhood in the Midwest. We ask: Why do some Latino youth notify police about violent crimes more than others? Using a unique survey data set of neighborhood youth (N = 292), we find that (1) the majority of youth in the sample do, in fact, notify police about violent crimes and (2) logistic regression models reveal the importance of social ties with gang members, negative past encounters with police, and immigration status as significant correlates of willingness to notify police about violent crimes. We conclude by discussing implications for research on Latino police notification and policy efforts to improve Latino community–police relations.
AlpertG. P.DunhamR. G. (1988). Policing multi-ethnic neighborhoods: The Miami study and findings for law enforcement in the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
2.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
BaumerE. P. (2002). Neighborhood disadvantage and police notification by victims of violence. Criminology, 40, 579–616.
5.
BayleyD. H.MendelsohnH. A. (1969). Minorities and the police: Confrontation in America. New York, NY: Free Press.
6.
BlackD. J. (1976). The behavior of law. New York, NY: Academic Press.
7.
BlockR. (1974). Why notify the police: The victim’s decision to notify the police of an assault. Criminology, 11, 555–569.
8.
BrunsonR. K.MillerJ. (2006). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 613–640.
9.
CarrP. J.KeatingL.NapolitanoJ. (2007). We never call the cops and here is why: A qualitative examination of legal cynicism in three Philadelphia neighborhoods. Criminology, 45, 445–480.
10.
Chicago Crime Commission. (2012). The gang book: A detailed overview of street gangs in the Chicago metropolitan area. Chicago, IL: Author.
11.
CorreiaM. E. (2010). Determinants of attitudes toward police of Latino immigrants and non-immigrants. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 99–107.
12.
DavisR. C.ErezE.AvitabileN. E. (1998). Immigrants and the criminal justice system: An exploratory study. Violence and Victims, 13, 21–30.
13.
EltagouriM. (2017, February19). Little village streets, restaurants quiet as deportation fears rise. Chicago Tribune.
14.
FelsonR. B.MessnerS. F.HoskinA. (1999). The victim-offender relationship and calling the police in assaults. Criminology, 37, 901–917.
15.
FelsonR. B.MessnerS. F.HoskinA. (2000). Acquaintance robbery. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 284–305.
16.
GarciaJ. A. (2016). Latino politic in America: Community, culture, interests. New York, NY: Roman and Littlefield.
17.
GauJ. M.BrunsonR. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27, 255–279.
18.
GreenbergM. S.RubackR. B.WestcottD. R. (1982). Decision making by crime victims: A multimethod approach. Law & Society Review, 17, 47–84.
19.
GriffithsC. T.WinfreeL. T. (1982). Attitudes toward the police: A comparison of Canadian and American adolescents. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 6, 127–141.
20.
HaganJ.SheddC.PayneM. (2005). Race, ethnicity and youth perceptions of criminal injustice. American Sociological Review, 70, 381–407.
21.
HolmesM. D. (1998). Perceptions of abusive police practices in a US–Mexico border community. The Social Science Journal, 35, 107–119.
22.
IbarraP. R. (2002). Contacts with police: Patterns and meanings in multicultural realm. Police & Society, 7, 133–164.
23.
JacobsB. A.WrightR. (2006). Street justice: Retaliation in the criminal underworld. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24.
KaneR. J. (2005). Compromised police legitimacy as a predictor of violent crime in structurally disadvantaged communities. Criminology, 43, 469–498.
25.
LurigioA. J.GreenleafR. G.FlexonJ. L. (2009). The effects of race on relationships with the police: A survey of African American and Latino youths in Chicago. Western Criminology Review, 10, 29–41.
26.
MartinezR. E. (2007). Incorporating Latinos and immigrants into policing research. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 57–64.
27.
McCluskeyJ. D.McCluskeyC. P.EnriquezR. (2009). A comparison of Latino and White citizen satisfaction with police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 471–477.
MenjívarC.BejaranoC. (2004). Latino immigrants’ perceptions of crime and police authorities in the United States: A case study from the phoenix metropolitan area. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27, 120–148.
30.
PapachristosA. V. (2009). Murder by structure: Dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 74–128.
31.
PattilloM. E. (1999). Black picket fences: Privilege and peril among the black middle class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2005). Macro structural analyses of race, ethnicity, and violent crime: Recent lessons and new direction for research. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 331–356.
33.
RaginC. C.BeckerH. S. (Eds.). (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
ReisigM. D.ParksR. B. (2000). Experience, quality of life and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly, 17, 607–630.
35.
ReitzelJ. D.RiceS. K.PiqueroA. R. (2003). Lines and shadows: Perceptions of racial profiling and the Hispanic experience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 607–616.
36.
RiosV. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino Boys. New York, NY: New York University Press.
37.
RomeroM. (2006). Racial profiling and immigration law enforcement: Rounding up of usual suspects in the Latino community. Critical Sociology, 32, 447–473.
38.
RosenbaumD. P.SchuckA. M.CostelloS. K.HawkinsD. F.RingM. K. (2005). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly, 8, 343–365.
39.
RosenfeldR.JacobsB.WrightR. (2003). Snitching and the code of the street. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 291–309.
40.
RubackR. B.GreenbergM. S.WestcottD. R. (1984). Social influence and crime-victim decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 51–76.
41.
RusinkoW. T.JonsonK. W.HornungC. A. (1978). The importance of police contact in the formulation of youths’ attitudes toward police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 6, 53–67.
42.
SampsonR. J.BartuschD. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review, 32, 777–804.
43.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
44.
Sanchez-JankowskiM. (1991). Islands in the street: Gangs and American urban society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
ScaglionR.CondonR. G. (1980). Determinants of attitudes toward city police. Criminology, 17, 485–494.
46.
SchaferJ. A.HuebnerB. M.BynumT. S. (2003). Citizen perceptions of police services: Race, neighborhood context, and community policing. Police Quarterly, 6, 440–468.
47.
SharkeyP. T. (2006). Navigating dangerous streets: The sources and consequences of Street efficacy. American Sociological Review, 71, 826–846.
48.
SkoganW. G. (2005). Citizen satisfaction with police encounters. Police Quarterly, 8, 298–321.
49.
SkoganW. G. (2011). Community-based partnerships and crime prevention. Criminology and Public Policy, 10, 987–990.
50.
SkoganW. G.HartnettS. (1997). Community policing, Chicago style. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
SkoganW. G.SteinerL. (2004). Crime, disorder and decay in Chicago’s Latino community. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2, 7–26.
52.
SmithD.GrahamN.AdamsB. (1991). Minorities and the police: Attitudinal and behavioral questions. In LynchM.PattersonE. B. (Eds.), Race and criminal justice (pp. 22–35). New York, NY: Harrow and Heston.
53.
SolisC.PortillosE.BrusonR. (2009). Latino Youths’ experiences with and perceptions of involuntary police encounters. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623, 39–51.
54.
SparksR. F. (1982). Research on victims of crime. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
55.
SpergelI. A. (2007). Reducing youth gang violence: The little village gang project in Chicago. New York, NY: Altamira Press.
56.
TylerT. R.HuoY. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
57.
TaylorT. J.TurnerK. B.EsbensenF.WinfreeL. T. (2001). Coppin’ an attitude: Attitudinal differences among juveniles toward police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 295–305.
58.
VargasRobert. 2016. Wounded City: Violent Turf Wars in a Chicago Barrio. New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
VelezM. (2001). The role of public social control in urban neighborhoods. Criminology, 39, 837–863.
60.
Vera SanchezC. G.GauJ. M. (2015). Racially neutral policing? Puerto Rican and Mexican young adults’ experiences with order maintenance strategies. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology, 3, 166–194.
61.
WalkerS.SpohnC.DeLoneM. (2000). The color of justice: Race, ethnicity, and crime in America. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
62.
WeitzerR. (1999). Citizens’ perceptions of police misconduct: Race and neighborhood context. Justice Quarterly, 16, 819–846.
63.
WeitzerR. (2014). The puzzling neglect of Hispanic Americans in research on police–citizen relations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37, 1995–2013.
64.
WeitzerR.BrunsonR. K. (2009). Strategic responses to the police among inner-city youth. Sociological Quarterly, 50, 235–256.
65.
United States Department of Justice. Civil Rights Division. (2017). Investigation of the Chicago Police Department. Washington, D.C.: Government Publishing Office.
