This article centers on the institutional barriers Latinas face in their professional development. An autoethnographic approach is employed to explore common themes faced by Latinas that hinder their success via the lens of culture conflict theory. This study specifically focus on issues related to interactions with students, marginalization, and institutional racism. A set of individual and institutional-level recommendations that may serve to alleviate the challenges facing Latinas, and faculty of color in general, are discussed.
AgathangelouA. M.LingL. H. M. (2002). An unten(ur)able position: The politics of teaching for women of color in the US. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 4, 368–398.
2.
AndersonK. (2010). Student’s stereotypes of professors: An exploration of the double violations of ethnicity and gender. Social Psychology Education, 13, 459–472.
3.
AndersonK.SmithG. (2005). Students’ preconceptions of professors: Benefits and barriers according to ethnicity and gender. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27, 184–201.
4.
Association of Doctoral Programs in Criminology and Criminal Justice. (2016). 2016 Survey report. ADPCJJ. Retrieved fromhttp://www.adpccj.com/surveys.html
5.
EllisC. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
6.
GarcíaA. (2005). Reflexiones pedagógicas: Counter stories of race and gender: Situating experiences of Latinas in the academy. Latino Studies, 3, 261–273.
7.
GarzaH. (1993). Second-class academics: Chicano/Latino faculty in U.S. universities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 53, 33–41.
8.
GlascockJ.RuggieroT. E. (2006). The relationship of ethnicity and sex to professor credibility at a culturally diverse university. Communication Education, 55, 197–207.
9.
Gutiérrez y MuhsG.Flores NiemannY.GonzálezC. G.HarrisA. P. (2012). Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia. Logan: Utah State University Press.
10.
HarlowR. (2003). Race doesn’t matter, but…: The effect of race on professors’ experiences and emotion management in the undergraduate college classroom. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 348–363.
11.
HarrisA. P.GonzálezC. G. (2012) Introduction. In Gutiérrez y MuhsG.Flores NiemannY.GonzálezC. G.HarrisA. P. (Eds.), Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia (pp. 1–16). Logan: Utah State University Press.
12.
Harris-SchenzB. (1990). Helping with the bootstraps: The mentor’s task. Association of Departments of Foreign Languages Bulletin, 21, 18–21.
13.
Holman JonesS. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 763–791). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
KilduffM.MehraA. (1997). Postmodernism and organization research. The Academy of Management Review, 22, 453–481.
15.
LazosS. R. (2012). Are student teaching evaluations holding back women and minorities: The perils of “doing” gender and race in the classroom. In Gutiérrez y MuhsG.Flores NiemannY.GonzálezC. G.HarrisA. P. (Eds.), Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia (pp. 164–185). Logan: Utah State University Press.
16.
Machado-CasasM.Cantú RuizE.CantúN. M. (2013). Laberintos y testimonios: Latina faculty in the academy. Educational Foundation, 27, 3–14.
17.
MedinaC.LunaG. (2000). Narratives of Latina professors in higher education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 31, 47–66.
18.
McGowanJ. M. (2000). African American faculty classroom teaching experiences in predominantly white colleges and universities. Multicultural Teaching, 8, 19–22.
19.
MoffittK. R.HarrisH. E.Forbes BerthoudD. A. (2012). Present and unequal: A third wave approach to voice parallel experiences in managing oppression and bias in the academy. In Gutiérrez y MuhsG.Flores NiemannY.GonzálezC. G.HarrisA. P. (Eds.), Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia (pp. 78–92). Logan: Utah State University Press.
20.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Characteristics of postsecondary faculty: A report. Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved fromhttp://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cuf.asp
21.
PadillaR. V.ChávezR. C. (1995). The leaning ivory tower. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
PittmanC. (2010). Race and gender oppression in the classroom: The experiences of women faculty of color with white male students. Teaching Sociology, 38, 183–196.
23.
ReskinB. F. (2000). The proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 319–328.
24.
ReyesM. L.HalcónJ. J. (1988). Racism in academia: The old wolf revisited. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 299–314.
25.
Riva-HollyF. (2012). Igualadas. In Gutiérrez y MuhsG.Flores NiemannY.GonzálezC. G.HarrisA. P. (Eds.), Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia (pp. 287–299). Logan: Utah State University Press.
26.
SeguraD. (2003). Navigating between two worlds. The labyrinth of Chicana intellectual production in the academy. Journal of Black Studies, 32, 28–51.
27.
SellinT. (1938). Culture conflict and crime. New York, NY: Social Science Research Council.
28.
SmithG.AndersonK. J. (2005). Student’s ratings of professors: The teaching style contingency for Latino/a professors. Journal of Latinos and Education, 42, 115–136.
29.
StanleyC. A. (2006). An overview of the literature. In StanleyC. A. (Ed.), Faculty of color: Teaching in predominantly White organizations (pp. 1–30). Boston, MA: Anker.
30.
UttlB.WhiteC. A.Wong GonzalezD. (2016). Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies on Educational Evaluation. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007
31.
VargasL. (1999). When the “other” is the teacher: Implications of teacher diversity in higher education. Urban Review, 31, 359–383.
32.
VoldG. B. (1958). Theoretical criminology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
