Postsecondary correctional education (PSCE) is witnessing a revitalization, offering the incarcerated and formerly incarcerated an important source of human and social capital. Yet, opportunities for higher education among this population are patterned by larger structural exclusions based on race, class, and place. In this article, we investigate the impact of race and class inequalities among students in a program for formerly incarcerated individuals at a large state university. Specifically, we draw from 34 in-depth interviews with past and present program participants to examine how pre- and postcarceral financial, familial, community, and social network contexts shape postsecondary experiences after incarceration. Research participants came from community contexts with vastly different resources, with consequences for social identities, educational preparedness, and embeddedness in crime preincarceration. These circumstances differentially prepared students for university studies postrelease. In addition, during the postcarceral period, study participants had disparate access to familial supports, were unequally burdened by financial difficulties and familial responsibilities, and differentially exposed to risks for reoffending. These patterns were closely tied to race, social class, and neighborhood characteristics. Our work highlights the import of attention to such disparities for PSCE, to facilitate its equitable access among incarcerated and formerly incarcerated populations.
AndersA. D.NoblitG. W. (2011). Understanding effective higher education programs in prisons: Considerations from the incarcerated individual program in North Carolina. Journal of Correctional Education, 62, 77–93.
2.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
ApelR.SweetenG. (2010). The impact of incarceration on employment during the transition to adulthood. Social Problems, 57, 448–479.
5.
BarrD. A. (2008). Health disparities in the United States: Social class, race, ethnicity and health. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
BersaniB. E.DohertyE. E. (2013). When the ties that bind unwind: Examining the enduring and situational processes of change behind the marriage effect. Criminology, 51, 399–433.
7.
BushwayS.BriggsS.TaxmanF.ThannerM.Van BrakleM. (2007a). Private providers of criminal history records: Do you get what you pay for? In BushwayS. D.StollM. A.WeimanD. F. (Eds.), Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America (pp. 174–200). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
8.
BushwayS.StollM. A.WeimanD. F. (2007b). Introduction. In BushwayS. D.StollM. A.WeimanD. F. (Eds.), Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
9.
CarlssonC. (2013). Masculinities, persistence, and desistance. Criminology, 51, 661–693.
10.
Center for Community Alternatives. (2011). The use of criminal history records in college admissions reconsidered. New York, NY: Author.
11.
ChappellC. A. (2004). Post-secondary correctional education and recidivism: A meta-analysis of research conducted 1990-1999. Journal of Correctional Education, 55, 148–169.
12.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
ChoR. M.TylerJ. H. (2010). Does prison-based adult basic education improve post-release outcomes for male prisoners in Florida?Crime & Delinquency, 59, 975–1005.
14.
ClearT. R. (2007). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
ClearT. R.FrostN. A. (2013). The punishment imperative: The rise and failure of mass incarceration in America. New York: New York University Press.
16.
CoggshallJ. G.OsherD.ColombiG. (2013). Enhancing educators’ capacity to stop the school-to-prison pipeline. Family Court Review, 51, 435–444.
17.
ColeyR. J.BartonP. E. (2006). Locked up and locked out: An educational perspective on the U.S. prison population. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
18.
DavisL. M.BozickR.SteeleJ. L.SaundersJ.MilesJ. N. V. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional education: A meta-analysis of programs that provide education to incarcerated adults. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
19.
DohertyE. E.EnsmingerM. E. (2013). Marriage and offending among a cohort of disadvantaged African Americans. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 104–131.
20.
EdinK.KefalasM. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
EdinK.TachL.MincyR. (2009). Claiming fatherhood: Race and dynamics of paternal involvement among unmarried men. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621, 149–177.
22.
ErismanW.ContardoJ. (2005). Learning to reduce recidivism: A 50-state analysis of postsecondary correctional education policy. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
23.
FabeloT. (2002). The impact of prison education on community reintegration of inmates: The Texas case. Journal of Correctional Education, 53, 106–110.
24.
FaderJ. J. (2013). Falling back: Incarceration and transitions to adulthood among urban youth. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
25.
FordJ. A.SchroederR. D. (2011). Higher education and criminal offending over the life course. Sociological Spectrum, 31, 32–58.
26.
GiordanoP.CherkovichS. A.RudolfJ. (2002). Gender, crime and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990–1064.
27.
GorgolL. E.SponslerB. A. (2011). Unlocking potential: Results of a national survey of post-secondary education in state prisons. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
28.
HealyD. (2013). Changing fate? Agency and the desistance process. Theoretical Criminology, 17, 557–574.
29.
HippJ. R.PetersiliaJ.TurnerS. (2010). Parolee recidivism in California: The effect of neighborhood social context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology, 48, 957–979.
30.
KingR.MassogliaM.MacMillanR. (2007). The context of marriage and crime: Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology, 45, 33–65.
31.
KingS. (2012). Transformative agency and desistance from crime. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 13, 317–335.
32.
KirkD. S. (2012). Residential change as a turning point in the life course of crime: Desistance or temporary cessation?Criminology, 50, 329–358.
33.
KubrinC. E.StewartE. A. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44, 165–197.
34.
LangbergJ. B.FeddersB. A. (2013). How Juvenile defenders can help dismantle the school-to-prison pipeline: A primer on educational advocacy and incorporating clients’ education histories and records into delinquency representation. Journal of Law & Education, 42, 653–690.
35.
LaubJ. H.NaginD. S.SampsonR. J. (1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63, 225–238.
36.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
37.
LintonJ. (2011). United States Department of Education update. Journal of Correctional Education, 62, 73–76.
38.
MarunaS. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39.
MearsD. P.WangX.HayC.BalesW. (2008). Social ecology and recidivism: Implications for prisoner reentry. Criminology, 46, 301–340.
40.
MercerK. R. (2009). The importance of funding post-secondary correctional educational programs. Community College Review, 37, 153–164.
41.
MeyerS. J. (2011). Factors affecting student success in post-secondary academic correctional education. Journal of Correctional Education, 62, 132–164.
42.
MillerJ. (2005). The status of qualitative research in criminology. In LamontM.WhiteP. (Eds.), Final report: Workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research (pp. 69–75). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
43.
MillerJ. (2011). Grounding the analysis of gender and crime: Accomplishing and interpreting qualitative interview research. In GaddD.KarstedtS.MessnerS. F. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of criminological research methods (pp. 49–62). London, England: Sage.
44.
NaserR. L.LaVigneN. G. (2006). Family support in the prisoner reentry process: Expectations and realities. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43, 93–106.
45.
PagerD. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937–975.
46.
PatilloM. (1998). Sweet mothers and gangbangers: Managing crime in a black middle-class neighborhood. Social Forces, 76, 747–774.
47.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2010). Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
48.
PettitB. (2012). Invisible men: Mass incarceration and the myth of black progress. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
49.
ReisigM. D.BalesW. D.HayC.WangX. (2007). The effect of racial inequality on black male recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 24, 408–434.
50.
SilvermanD. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
StewartE. A.SimonsR. L. (2010). Race, code of the street, and violent delinquency: A multilevel investigation of neighborhood street culture and individual norms of violence. Criminology, 48, 569–605.
52.
TaylorC. J. (2013). The Supervision to Aid Reentry (STAR) programme: Enhancing the social capital of ex-offenders. Probation Journal, 60, 119–135.
53.
TylerJ. H.KlingJ. R. (2007). Prison-based education and reentry into the mainstream labor market. In BushwayS. D.StollM. A.WeimanD. F. (Eds.), Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America (pp. 227–256). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
54.
UbahC. B. A. (2004). Abolition of Pell grants for higher education of prisoners: Examining antecedents and consequences. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39, 73–85.
55.
UggenC.ThompsonM. (2003). The sociological determinants of ill-gotten gains: Within-person changes in drug use and illegal earnings. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 146–185.
VisherC. A.Debus-SherrillS. A.YahnerJ. (2011). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of former prisoners. Justice Quarterly, 28, 698–718.
58.
VisherC. A.TravisJ. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89–113.
59.
WakefieldS.WildemanC. (2013). Children of the prison boom: Mass incarceration and the future of American inequality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
60.
WangX.BlombergT. G.LiS. D. (2005). Comparison of the educational deficiencies of delinquent and nondelinquent students. Evaluation Review, 29, 291–312.
61.
WesternB. (2007). Punishment and inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
62.
WheeldonJ. (2011). Visualizing the future of research on post secondary correctional education: Designs, data, and deliverables. The Journal of Correctional Education, 62, 94–115.
