Living with a felony conviction exposes people to a host of negative life experiences, including unemployment, low income, and family instability. Pretrial diversions offer defendants a rare chance to escape this fate. Using data from the State Court Processing Statistics, this study examines racial disparities in pretrial diversion among men charged with felony crimes in metropolitan counties in the even years from 1990 to 2006. The study finds that prosecutors are more likely to grant pretrial diversions to White defendants than they are to grant these diversions to Black or Latino defendants with similar legal characteristics. Moreover, while disparities disadvantaging Latinos are only present among defendants whose most serious arrest charge is for a drug crime and who have no prior convictions, those disparities disadvantaging Blacks occur both among defendants whose most serious arrest charge is for a drug crime regardless of prior convictions and among defendants charged with violent crimes who have no prior convictions.
AlbonettiC. (1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21, 291–313.
2.
AlbonettiC. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247–266.
3.
AlbonettiC. (2002). The joint conditioning effect of defendant’s gender and ethnicity on length of imprisonment under the federal sentencing guidelines for drug trafficking/manufacturing offenders. Journal Gender Race & Justice, 6, 39–473.
4.
AlbonettiC.HepburnJ. (1996). Prosecutorial discretion to defer criminalization: The effects of defendant’s ascribed and achieved status characteristics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12, 63–81.
5.
AlexanderM. (2010). The new jim crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness (1st ed.). New York, NY: The New Press.
6.
AlschulerA. (1978). Sentencing reform and prosecutorial power: A critique of recent proposals for “fixed” and “presumptive” sentencing. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 126, 550–577.
7.
BeckettK.NyropK.PfingstL. (2006). Race, drugs, and policing: Understanding disparities in drug delivery arrests. Criminology, 44, 105–137.
8.
BeckettK.NyropK.PfingstL.BowenM. (2005). Drug use, drug possession arrests, and the question of race: Lessons from Seattle. Social Problems, 52, 419–441.
9.
BelenkoS.FabrikantN.WolffN. (2011). The long road to treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1222–1243.
10.
BellassaiJ. (2010, September 1). A short history of the pretrial diversion of adult defendants from traditional criminal justice processing, Part one: The early years. Washington, DC: National Association of Pretrial Service Agencies.
11.
BenderS. (2003). Greasers and gringos: Latinos, law, and the American imagination. New York, NY: New York University Press.
12.
BergC. R. (2002). Latino images in film: Stereotypes, subversion, & resistance. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
13.
BjerkD. (2005). Making the crime fit the penalty: The role of prosecutorial discretion under mandatory minimum sentencing. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 591–625.
14.
BlombergT. (1977). Diversion and accelerated social control. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 68, 274.
15.
BlombergT.BalesW.ReedK. (1993). Intermediate punishment: Redistributing or extending social control?Crime, Law and Social Change, 19, 187–201.
16.
BlombergT.HealdG. R.EzellM. (1986). Diversion and net widening. Evaluation Review, 10, 45–64.
17.
BoboL.KluegelJ. R.SmithR. A. (1997). Laissez-faire racism: The crystallization of a kinder, gentler antiblack ideology. In TuchS. A.MartinJ. K. (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and change (pp. 15–42). Westport, CT: Praeger.
18.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc.
19.
BontragerS.BalesW.ChiricosT. (2005). Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons. Criminology, 43, 589–622.
20.
BrakelS. (1971). Diversion from the criminal process: Informal discretion, motivation, and formalization. Denver Law Journal, 48, 211.
21.
BridgesG.CrutchfieldR. (1988). Law, social standing and racial disparities in imprisonment. Social Forces, 66, 699–724.
22.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2003, August). Prevalence of imprisonment in the U.S. population, 1974-2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
23.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2010). State court processing statistics, 1990-2006: Felony defendants in large urban counties. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02038
24.
BushwayS.PiehlA. M. (2007). Social science research and the legal threat to presumptive sentencing guidelines. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 461.
25.
BynumT. S. (1982). Prosecutorial discretion and the implementation of a legislative mandate. Implementing Criminal Justice Policies, 26, 47–59.
26.
CaravelisC.ChiricosT.BalesW. (2011). Static and dynamic indicators of minority threat in sentencing outcomes: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 405–425
27.
CarodineM. (2009). The mis-characterization of the negro: A race critique of the prior conviction impeachment rule. Indiana Law Journal, 84, 521.
28.
ChangS.-H.KleinerB. (2003). Common racial stereotypes. Equal Opportunities International, 22, 1–9.
29.
ChavezL. R. (2008). The Latino threat: Constructing immigrants, citizens, and the nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
ChiricosT.BalesW. (1991). Unemployment and punishment: An empirical assessment. Criminology, 29, 701.
31.
CorrellJ.ParkB.JuddC.WittenbrinkB. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.
32.
CrawfordC. (2000). Gender, race, and habitual offender sentencing in Florida. Criminology, 38, 263–280.
33.
CrawfordC.ChiricosT.KleckG. (1998). Race, racial threat, and sentencing of habitual offenders. Criminology, 36, 481–512.
34.
CrowM. S.JohnsonK. A. (2008). Race, ethnicity, and habitual-offender sentencing. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 63.
35.
DavisA. J. (2000). American prosecutor: Independence, power, and the threat of tyranny, The Iowa Law Review, 86, 393.
36.
DavisA. J. (2007a). Racial fairness in the criminal justice system: The role of the prosecutor. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 39, 202.
37.
DavisA. J. (2007b). Arbitrary justice: The power of the American prosecutor. Oxford University Press, USA.
38.
DelgadoR. (1994). Rodrigo’s eighth chronicle: Black crime, white fears. on the social construction of threat. Virginia Law Review, 80, 503–548.
39.
DemuthS. (2003). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of hispanic, Black, and White felony arrestees. Criminology, 41, 873–907.
40.
EberhardtJ. L.GoffP. A.PurdieV. J.DaviesP. G. (2004). Seeing Black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 876–893.
41.
EntmanR.GrossK. (2008). Race to judgment: Stereotyping media and criminal defendants. Law & Contemporary Problems, 71, 93.
42.
FarrellJ. (2003). Mandatory minimum firearm penalties: A source of sentencing disparity?Justice Research and Policy, 5, 95–116.
43.
FoxC. (2004). The changing color of welfare? How Whites’ attitudes toward Latinos influence support for welfare 1. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 580–625.
44.
FraseR. S. (2009). What explains persistent racial disproportionality in Minnesota’s prison and jail populations?Crime and Justice, 38, 201–280.
45.
FreudenbergN. (2002). Adverse effects of US jail and prison policies on the health and well-being of women of color. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1895.
46.
GilmoreR. (2007). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47.
HarcourtB. (2007). Against prediction: Profiling, policing, and punishing in an actuarial age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
HebertC. (1997). Sentencing outcomes of black, Hispanic, and white males convicted under federal sentencing guidelines. Criminal Justice Review, 22, 133–157.
49.
HelmsR.CostanzaS. E. (2009). Race, politics, and drug law enforcement: an analysis of civil asset forfeiture patterns across US counties. Policing & Society, 19, 1–19.
50.
HelmsR.JacobsD. (2002). The political context of sentencing: An analysis of community and individual determinants. Social Forces, 81, 577–604.
51.
HindelangM. (1981). Variations in sex-race-rge-specific incidence rates of offending. American Sociological Review, 46, 461–474.
52.
HuddyL.SearsD. (1995). Opposition to bilingual education: Prejudice or the defense of realistic interests?Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 133–143.
53.
JacksonL. (1995). Stereotypes, emotions, behavior, and overall attitudes toward Hispanics by Anglos. Michigan, MI: Julian Samora Research Institute, Michigan State University.
54.
JacobsD.HelmsR. (1996). Toward a political model of incarceration: A time-series examination of multiple explanations for prison admission rates. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 323–357.
55.
JoeK. A. (1994). The new criminal conspiracy? Asian gangs and organized crime in San Francisco. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 390–415.
56.
JohnsonB. (2005). Contextual disparities in guidelines departures: Courtroom social contexts, guidelines compliance, and extralegal disparities in criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 761–96.
57.
KramerJ.SteffensmeierD. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 357–376.
58.
KrugP. (2002). Prosecutorial discretion and its limits. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 50, 643–664.
LangeS.RehmJ.PopovaS. (2011). The effectiveness of criminal justice diversion initiatives in North America: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 200–214.
61.
LewisJ. (2010). Shifting the focus: Restorative justice and sex work. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale, 52, 285–301.
62.
LopooL.WesternB. (2005). Incarceration and the formation and stability of marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 721–735.
63.
ManzaJ.UggenC. (2004). Punishment and democracy: Disenfranchisement of nonincarcerated felons in the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 491–505.
64.
ManzaJ.UggenC. (2006). Locked out: Felon disenfranchisement and American democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65.
MauerM.Chesney-LindM. (2002). The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. New York, NY: The New Press.
66.
McConahayJ.HoughJ. (1976). Symbolic racism. Journal of social Issues, 32, 23–45.
67.
McKenzieW.StemenD.CoursenD. (2009, March). Prosecution and racial justice: Using data to advance fairness in criminal prosecution. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
68.
McVeighR. (2004). Structured ignorance and organized racism in the United States. Social Forces, 82, 895–936.
69.
MeleC.MillerT. A. (2005). Civil penalties, social consequences. New York, NY: Routledge.
70.
MendelbergT. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71.
MorrisN. (1974). The future of imprisonment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72.
MorrisN.TonryM. (1991). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. Oxford University Press.
MuñozE.McMorrisB. (2002). Misdemeanor sentencing decisions: The cost of being Native American. The Justice Professional, 15, 239–259.
75.
National Association of Pretrial Services Agencies. (2009). Pretrial diversion in the 21st century.
76.
National District Attorneys’ Association. (2010). National procecution standards (3rd Ed.).
77.
NgaiM. (2004). Impossible subjects: Illegal aliens and the making of modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78.
NobilingT.SpohnC.DeLoneM. (1998). A tale of two counties: Unemployment and sentence severity. Justice Quarterly, 15, 459–485.
79.
PackerH. L. (1964). Two models of the criminal process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113, 1–68.
80.
PagerD. (2007). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
81.
PayneB. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192.
82.
PetersiliaJ. (1984). Racial disparities in the criminal justice system: Executive summary of rand institute study. In Georges-AbeyieD. (Ed.), Criminal justice system and blacks (pp. 225–253). New York, NY: Clark Boardmand Company.
83.
PetersonR.HaganJ. (1984). Changing conceptions of race: Towards an account of anomalous findings of sentencing research. American Sociological Review, 49, 56–70.
84.
PhillipsM.WolfA.CoonsD. (1988). Psychiatry and the criminal justice system: Testing the myths. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 605.
85.
PortillosE. L. (1998). Latinos, gangs, and drugs. Images of color, Images of crime, 156–166. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
86.
ReimanJ. (2004). The rich get richer and the poor get prison: Ideology, class and criminal (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
87.
SampsonR.LauritsenJ. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. Crime and Justice, 21, 311–374.
88.
SchlesingerT. (2005). Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing. Justice Quarterly, 22, 170–192.
89.
SchlesingerT. (2008). Equality at the price of justice. Feminist Formations, 20, 27–47.
90.
SchlesingerT. (2011). The failure of race neutral policies: How mandatory terms and sentencing enhancements contribute to mass racialized incarceration. Crime & Delinquency, 57, 56–81.
91.
SearsD. O.KinderD. R. (1971). Racial tensions and voting behavior in Los Angeles. In HirschW. (Ed.), Los Angeles: viability and prospects for metropolitan leadership (pp. 55–75). New York, NY: Praeger.
92.
ShaverF. M.LewisJ.Maticka-TyndaleE. (2011). Rising to the challenge: Addressing the concerns of people working in the sex industry. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 48, 47–65.
93.
ShermerL.JohnsonB. (2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in US federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 394–430.
94.
SnyderH. (2011, September). Arrests in the United States, 1980 to 2009. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved fromhttp://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2203
95.
SpohnC. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice: The National Institute of Justice Journal, 3, 427–501.
96.
SpohnC.BeichnerD.Davis-FrenzelE. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the “Gateway to Justice”. Social Problems, 48, 206–235.
97.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review, 65, 705–729.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race–ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female white, black, and hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241–261.
100.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). Interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male, Criminology, 36, 763–797.
101.
SunnafrankM.FontesN. E. (1983). General and crime related racial stereotypes and influence on juridic decisions. Cornell Journal of Social Relations, 17, 1–15.
102.
TonryM. (2011). Punishing race: A continuing American dilemma. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
103.
UggenC.ManzaJ. (2002). Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review, 67, 777–803.
104.
UlmerJ.KurlychekM.KramerJ. (2007). Prosecutorial discretion and the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 427.
105.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). American fact finder: Race and hispanic or Latino Origin, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau.
106.
VincentB.HoferP. (1994). Consequences of mandatory minimum prison terms: A summary of recent findings. Federal Sentencing Report, 7, 33–38.
107.
WacquantL. (2001). Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishment & Society, 3, 95.
108.
WesternB. (2002). The impact of incarceration on wage mobility and inequality. American Sociological Review, 67, 526–546.
109.
WesternB.McLanahanS. (2000). Fathers behind bars: The impact of incarceration on family formation. Families, Crime, and Criminal Justice, 2, 309–324.
110.
WesternB.PettitB. (2005). Black-White wage inequality, employment rates, and incarceration 1. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 553–578.
111.
WilsonW. J. (1978). The declining significance of race: Blacks and changing American institutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
112.
WooldredgeJ.GriffinT. (2005). Displaced discretion under Ohio sentencing guidelines. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 301–316.
113.
YenR. (2000). Racial stereotyping of Asians and Asian Americans and its effect on criminal justice: A reflection on the Wayne Lo Case. Asian Law Journal, 7, 1.
114.
ZatzM. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Race, Crime, and Justice: A Reader, 24, 69–92.
115.
ZimringF.HawkinsG.KaminS. (2001). Punishment and democracy: Three strikes and you’re out in California. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
