Data from a survey of residents of a Southern Ute Indian reservation in Colorado carried out by Abril (2007) are used to compare perceptions of crime seriousness held by members of an American Indian tribe with those of non-Indians living on the same reservation. There are few significant or substantial differences between the two groups. These findings bear on debates in criminology and the sociology of law regarding the extent to which the content of the criminal law reflects a broad consensus in society or entails the imposition of rules made by and for dominant groups on subordinate groups holding different cultural values and norms. Additional data are deployed to assess subcultural explanations of high levels of interpersonal violence on American Indian reservations.
AbrilJ. C. (2005). Southern Ute Indian tribe community safety survey(Document No. 212237. Grant No. 2001-3277-CA-BJ). Retrieved March 27, 2009, from222.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/bjs/212237.pdf
2.
AbrilJ. C. (2007). Perceptions of crime seriousness, cultural values, and collective efficacy among Native American Indians and Non-Indians who live within the same community. [Electronic Version]. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 3, 172–196.
3.
BahrS. J.HoffmanJ. P.YangX. (2005). Parental & peer influences on the risk of adolescent drug use. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 529–551.
4.
BlalockH. M., Jr. (1972). Social statistics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
EvansS. S.ScottJ. E. (1984). The seriousness of crime cross-culturally. Criminology, 22, 39–59.
7.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (Various years). Crime in the United States(annual). Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice.
8.
GibbonsD. C. (1969). Crime and punishment: A study in social attitudes. Social Forces, 45, 391–397.
9.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
KornhauserR. R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency: An appraisal of analytic models. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
LiskaA. E. (1973). Causal structures underlying the relationship between delinquent involvement and delinquent peers. Sociology and Social Research, 58, 23–36.
12.
McCloskeyD. N. (1985). The loss function has been mislaid: The rhetoric of significance tests. American Economic Review, 75, 201–205.
13.
McCloskeyD.ZiliakS. T. (1996). The standard error of regressions. Journal of Economic Literature, 23, 97–114.
14.
McCloskeyH.ZellerJ. (1984). The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
MertonR. K. (1938). Anomie and social structure. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.
16.
MorrisonD. E.HenkelR. E. (1969). Significance tests reconsidered. American Sociologist4, 131–240.
17.
NewmanG. (1976). Comparative deviance: Perception and law in six cultures. New York, NY: Elsevier.
PerryS. W. (2004). American Indians and crime: A BJS statistical profile, 1992-2002. NCJ 203097. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
20.
ReinarmanC. (1987). American states of mind: Political beliefs and behaviors among private and public workers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
RoseA. M.PrellA. E. (1955). Does the punishment fit the crime? A study in social valuation. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 247–259.
22.
RossiP. H.HenryJ. P. (1981). Seriousness: A measure for all purposes. In KleinM. W.TielmannK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of criminal justice evaluation (pp. 489–505). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
RossiP. H.WaiteE.BoseC. E.BerkR. (1974). The seriousness of crimes: Normative structure and individual differences. American Sociological Review, 39, 224–237.
24.
SatterthwaiteF. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 110–114.
25.
SchragerL. S.ShortJ. F.Jr. (1980). How serious a crime? Perceptions of organizational and common crimes. In GeisG.StotlandE. (Eds.), White-collar crime: Theory and research (pp. 14–31). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
ScottJ. E.ThakebF. (1977). The public’s perceptions of crime: Scandinavia, Western Europe, the Middle East, and the United States. In HuffC. R. (Ed.), Contemporary corrections: social control and conflict (pp. 78–88). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
SellinT. (1938). Culture conflict and crime: A report of the subcommittee on delinquency of the committee on personality and culture. New York: Social Science Research Council.
28.
SellinT.WolfgangM. E. (1964). The measurement of delinquency. New York, NY: Wiley.
29.
SinclairA. (1962). Prohibition, the era of excess. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
30.
SutherlandE. H. (1939). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.
31.
SykesG. M.MatzaD. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 665–670.
32.
TaylorI.WaltonP.YoungJ. (1974). The new criminology: For a social theory of deviance. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.
33.
TittleC. R. (1980). Sanctions and social deviance. New York, NY: Praeger.
34.
TittleC. R.PaternosterR. (2000). Social deviance and crime: An organizational and theoretical approach. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
35.
TurkA. T. (1982). Political criminality: The defiance and defense of authority. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36.
WarrM. (1989). What is the perceived seriousness of crimes?Criminology, 27, 795–821.
37.
WirthL. (1931). Culture conflict and delinquency. I. Culture conflict and misconduct. Social Forces, 9, 484–492.
38.
WolfgangM. E.FerracutiF. (1967). The subculture of violence: Towards an integrated theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
WolfgangM. E.FiglioR. M.TracyP. E.SingerS. I. (1985). The national survey of crime severity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
40.
ZellnerA. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 348–368.
41.
ZiliakS. T.McCloskeyD. N. (2008). The cult of statistical significance: How the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
