There is a large body of research examining the impact of race on juvenile court outcomes. Fewer studies have specifically examined the decision by prosecutors to formally petition a case to the juvenile court. A much smaller body of literature statistically controls for structural level variables (e.g., population density and racial composition), while examining the impact of race. Using the symbolic threat hypothesis, the current study examines the effect of race on the decision to petition a case to the juvenile court among youths in West Virginia’s juvenile court, while controlling for both individual and structural factors. The results show that race at the individual level did not have a significant impact on odds of petition; although, percentage in poverty significantly interacted with race to increase the odds of Black youths being petitioned in areas of increased poverty. Implications of the results are further discussed.
ArmstrongG. S.RodriquezN. (2005). Effects of individual and contextual characteristics on preadjudication detention of juvenile delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 22, 521–539.
2.
BishopD. M.FrazierC. E. (1996). Race effects in juvenile justice decision-making: Findings of a statewide analysis. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 86, 392–414.
3.
BridgesG. S.ConleyD.BerettaG. R.EngenR. L.. (1993). Racial disproportionality in the juvenile justice system: Final report. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Social and Health Services
4.
BridgesG.ConleyD.EngenR.Price-SpratlenT. (1995). Racial disparities in the confinement of juveniles: Effects of crime and community social structure on punishment. In Kempf-LeonardK.PopeC.FeyerhermW. (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice (pp. 128–152). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
BrittC. (2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions. Justice Quarterly, 17, 707–732.
6.
DeJongC.JacksonK. C. (1998). Putting race into context: Race, juvenile justice processing, and urbanization. Justice Quarterly, 15, 487–504.
7.
DixonJ. (1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1157–1198.
8.
FaganJ.SlaughterA.HartstoneE. (1987). Blind justice? The impact of race on juvenile justice process. Crime & Delinquency, 33, 224–258.
9.
FederleK. H.Chesney-LindM. (1992). Special issues in juvenile justice: Gender, race, and ethnicity. In SchwartzI. (Ed.), Juvenile justice and public policy: Toward a national agenda (pp. 165–195). New York, NY: Lexington.
10.
FeldB. C. (1991). Justice by geography: Urban, suburban, and rural variations in juvenile justice administration. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 76, 1132–1152.
11.
FrazierC. E.BishopD. M. (1985). The pretrial detention of juveniles and its impact on case dispositions. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 82, 156–210.
12.
GuevaraL.SpohnC.HerzD. (2004). Race, legal representation, and juvenile justice: Issues and concerns. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 344–371.
13.
HarmsP. (2002). Detention in delinquency cases, 1989-1998. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Deliquency Prevention.
14.
HarmsP. (2002). Detention in delinquency cases (pp. 1989–1998). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Deliquency Prevention.
15.
JohnsonB. D. (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge and county level influences in the study of courtroom decision making. Criminology, 44, 259–298.
16.
JohnsonB. D.UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (2008). The social contest of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 737–783.
17.
LeiberM. J.FoxK. C. (2005). Race and the impact of detention on juvenile justice decision making. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 470–497.
18.
LeiberM.JamiesonK. (1995). Race and decision-making within juvenile justice: The importance of context. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 363–388.
19.
LeiberM. J.JohnsonJ.FoxK.LacksR. (2007). Differentiating among racial/ethnic groups and its implications for understanding juvenile justice decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 471–484.
20.
LeiberM. J.JohnsonJ. D. (2008). Being young and black: What are their effects on juvenile justice decision making?Crime & Delinquency, 54, 560–581.
21.
LeiberM. J.MackK. Y. (2003). The individual and joint effects of race, gender, and family status on juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 34–70.
22.
LeiberM. J.StairsJ. M. (1999). Race, contexts and the use of intake diversion. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 56–86.
23.
LukeD. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
PopeC. E.FeyerhermW. H. (1990a). Minority status and juvenile processing: An assessment of the research literature (Part I). Criminal Justice Abstracts, 22, 327–335.
25.
PopeC. E.FeyerhermW. H. (1990b). Minority status and juvenile processing: An assessment of the research literature (Part II). Criminal Justice Abstracts, 22, 527–542.
26.
PuzzancheraC.AdamsB. (2008). National disproportionate minority contact databook. Developed by the National Center for Juvenile Justice for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Online. Available:http://ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/ojstatbb/dmcdb
27.
RaudenbushS.BrykA.CheongY. F.CongdonR.ToitM. (2004). HLM6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: SSI Scientific Software International.
28.
RodriguezN. (2007). Juvenile court context and detention decisions: Reconsidering the role of race, ethnicity, and community characteristics in juvenile court processes. Justice Quarterly, 24, 629–656.
29.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Structural variations in juvenile court processing: Inequality, the underclass, and social control. Law & Society Review, 27, 285–311.
30.
SchuttR. K.DanneferD. (1988). Detention decisions in juvenile cases: JINS, JDs, and gender. Law and Society Review, 22, 509–520.
31.
SecretP. E.JohnsonJ. B. (1997). The effect of race on juvenile justice decision making in Nebraska: Detention, adjudication, and disposition, 1988-1993. Justice Quarterly, 14, 445–478.
32.
SnyderH. (2005). Juvenile arrests 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and & Delinquency Prevention.
33.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–797.
34.
TittleC. R.CurranD. A. (1988). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces, 67, 23–58.
35.
WalkerS.SpohnC.DeLoneM. (2007). Race, ethnicity, and crime in America (4th ed.).
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
36.
WordesM.BynumT. S.CorleyC. J. (1994). Locking up youth: The impact of race on the detention decision. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 149–165.
37.
WuB. (1997). The effect of race and juvenile justice processing. Juvenile & Family Court Judges, 48, 43–51.
38.
WuB.FuentesA. (1998). The entangled effects of race and urban poverty. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 49, 41–53.
