A RE-AIM Analysis of Better Together: A Multi-Level Program to Improve Nutrition and Physical Activity in Early Care and Education in Four States

Abstract

Background:

Systemic barriers contribute to challenges in implementing sustainable improvements in early care and education (ECE) health promotion practices, including fragmented state systems, limited organizational capacity, and a lack of accessible, high-quality professional development. Guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, this study evaluated the Better Together approach—a multi-level quasi-experimental program aimed at enhancing health promotion practices in ECE programs.

Methods:

Better Together, developed by Nemours Children’s Health and University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Community Health & Wellness Resource Team, used organizational- and systems-level approaches to improve ECE health promotion practices. Learning collaboratives (organizational level) addressing ECE health practices were delivered by trained consultants. State partners coordinated efforts to impact state systems change using the CDC’s Spectrum of Opportunities 2.0 Framework (systems-level). Surveys and program data were collected to assess reach, effectiveness, adoption, and implementation. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate RE-AIM outcomes.

Results:

Four states implemented Better Together learning collaboratives, reaching 1,078 staff from 533 ECE programs. Across states, ECE program completion of initiative components ranged from 58.0 to 94.7% (adoption). Consultants implemented planned sessions (n = 26; implementation). On average, ECE programs experienced a 15.1% increase in health-promoting practices (range 11.8–17.5%; effectiveness). Partner groups generated 10 state system-level action plans to promote ECE health practices in perpetuity (maintenance).

Conclusions:

The RE-AIM evaluation of the Better Together program showed positive results. It reached a significant number of ECE programs, leading to increased health-promoting practices, policies, and environments, as well as initiated state-level ECE systems change to sustain support.

Keywords

early care and education child care nutrition physical activity systems change organizational change

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Childhood Obesity Facts. CDC; 2024. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood-obesity-facts/childhood-obesity-facts.html

2. Armstrong

, Wong

, Perrin

, et al. Association of physical activity with income, race/ethnicity, and sex among adolescents and young adults in the United States. JAMA Pediatr 2018;172(8):732. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2684233

3. Piernas

, Popkin

. Increased portion sizes from energy-dense foods affect total energy intake at eating occasions in US children and adolescents: Patterns and trends by age group and sociodemographic characteristics, 1977–2006. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94(5):1324–1332.

4. Reedy

, Krebs-Smith

. Dietary sources of energy, solid fats, and added sugars among children and adolescents in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc 2010;110(10):1477–1484.

5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Overweight & Obesity. CDC; 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity

6. Gubbels

, Van Assema

, Kremers

SPJ

. Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Dietary Patterns among Children. Curr Nutr Rep 2013;2(2):105–112. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637646/

7. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics . Early Childhood Program Participation: 2019 (NCES 2020-075REV), Table 1. National Center for Education Statistics; 2021. Available from: https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=4 [Last accessed: September 24, 2024].

8. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics . Digest of Education Statistics, 2022. National Center for Education Statistics; 2019. Available from: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/tables/dt22_202.30.asp [Last accessed: September 24, 2024].

9. Lauglin

. Who’s Minding the Kids? Child Care Arrangements: Spring 2011. United States Census Bureau: Washington, DC; 2013. Available from: https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2013/demo/p70-135.pdf

10.

10. Yoshikawa

, Weiland

, Brooks-Gunn

, et al. Investing in Our Future: The Evidence Base on Preschool Education. Foundation for Child Development, Society for Research in Child Development; 2013. Available from: https://www.fcd-us.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Evidence-Base-on-Preschool-Education-FINAL.pdf

11.

11. Burwich

, Davis

, Karoly

, et al. Promoting Sustainability of Child Care Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic. ACF.gov. Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2020. Available from: https://acf.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/Promoting%20Sustainability%20of%20Child%20Care%20Programs%20during%20COVID%20508_JC.pdf

12.

12. Cascio

. COVID-19, Early Care and Education, and Child Development. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2021. Available from: https://www.nber.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/cascio_seanWP_oct2021_revised.pdf [Last accessed: August 31, 2022].

13.

13. Carson

, Mattingly

. COVID-19 Didn’t Create a Child Care Crisis, But Hastened and Inflamed It. Carsey School of Public Policy and Federal Reserve Bank of Boston; 2020. Available from: https://carsey.unh.edu/publication/child-care-crisis-COVID-19 [Last accessed: August 31, 2022].

14.

14. Tekin

, Jones

, Kagan

. Addressing the Impact of COVID-19 on the Early Care and Education Sector (2022). National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; 2022. Available from: http://nap.nationalacademies.org/26463 [Last accessed: August 29, 2022].

15.

15. Bassok

, Galdo

. Inequality in preschool quality? Community-level disparities in access to high-quality learning environments. Early Educ Dev 2016;27(1):128–144.

16.

16. Flood

, McMurry

, Sojourner

, Wiswall

. Inequality in early care experienced by US children. J Econ Perspect 2022;36(2):199–222.

17.

17. Hatfield

, Lower

, Cassidy

, Faldowski

. Inequities in access to quality early care and education: Associations with funding and community context. Early Child Res Q 2015;30(Part B):316–326.

18.

18. Glasgow

, Vogt

, Boles

. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999;89(9):1322–1327.

19.

19.United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. Area Eligibility Mapper for CACFP and Summer Meals. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service; 2025. Available from: https://www.fns.usda.gov/cn/area-eligibility [Last accessed: September 29, 2025].

20.

20.Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute. Learning Collaboratives. ACT Center. Available from: https://www.act-center.org/our-work/implementation-science-and-practice/learning-collaboratives

21.

21. Ward

. An Instrument to Assess the Obesogenic Environment of Child Care Centers. ajhb 2008;32(4).

22.

22. Ward

, Mazzucca

, McWilliams

, Hales

. Use of the Environment and Policy Evaluation and Observation as a Self-Report Instrument (EPAO-SR) to measure nutrition and physical activity environments in child care settings: Validity and reliability evidence. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015;12(1).

23.

23.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Spectrum of Opportunities Framework. Early Care and Education. 2024. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/early-care-education/php/getting-started/spectrum-of-opportunities.html [Last accessed: September 23, 2025].

24.

24.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ECE Quick Start Action Guide. CDC; 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/early-care-education/php/making-change/quick-start-action-guide.html [Last accessed: October 5, 2025].

25.

25. Bijkerk

, Spigt

, Oenema

, Geschwind

. Engagement with mental health and health behavior change interventions: An integrative review of key concepts. J Contextual Behav Sci 2024;32:100748.

26.

26. Willis

, Chang

, Smith

, et al. Predictors of non-compliance with a national early care and education-based obesity prevention initiative: Go NAPSACC. Am J Health Promot 2022;36(5):864–868; doi: 10.1177/08901171211069550

27.

27.Child Care Aware® of America. Catalyzing Growth: Using Data to Change Child Care. Child Care Aware® of America. Available from: https://www.childcareaware.org/catalyzing-growth-using-data-to-change-child-care-2022/#LandscapeAnalysis [Last accessed: October 14, 2025].

28.

28.The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Child Population by Single Age. KIDS COUNT Data Center. The Annie E. Casey Foundation; 2025. Available from: https://datacenter.aecf.org/data/tables/100-child-population-by-single-age?loc=1&loct=2#detailed/2/2-53/false/1096 [Last accessed: October 14, 2025].

29.

29. Garvin

, Weissenburger-Moser Boyd

, Chiappone

, et al. Multisector approach to improve healthy eating and physical activity policies and practices in early care and education programs: The national early care and education learning collaboratives project, 2013–2017. Prev Chronic Dis 2019;16:E94.

30.

30.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Early Care and Education State Indicator Report 2023. US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2023.