Holistic Semantic Sustainability: Redesigning Organizational Sense-Making for AI Ethics Professions

1. Ali SJ , Christin A , Smart A , et al. Walking the walk of AI ethics: Organizational challenges and the individualization of risk among ethics entrepreneurs. In: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Association for Computing Machinery; 2023; pp. 217–226; doi: 10.1145/3593013.3593990

2. Floridi L . Semantic capital: Its nature, value, and curation. Philos Technol 2018;31(4):481–497; doi: 10.1007/s13347-018-0335-1

3. Morley J , Elhalal A , Garcia F , et al. Ethics as a service: A pragmatic operationalisation of AI ethics. Minds Mach (Dordr) 2021;31(2):239–256; doi: 10.1007/s11023-021-09563-w

4. Floridi L . AI as agency without intelligence: On artificial intelligence as a new form of artificial agency and the multiple realisability of agency thesis. Philos Technol 2025;38(1):30; doi: 10.1007/s13347-025-00858-9

5. Calvino I . Six memos for the next millennium ( Creagh P ., Trans.). Harvard University Press; 1988.

6. Weick KE . Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications; 1995.

7.Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union 2024 L 2024/1689. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj

8. Schultz MD , Conti LG , Seele P . Digital ethicswashing: A systematic review and a process-perception-outcome framework. AI Ethics 2025;5(2):805–818; doi: 10.1007/s43681-024-00430-9