The Relationship Between Adolescent Experiential Avoidance and Smartphone Addiction: A Study Based on Latent Transition Analysis and Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2026
The Relationship Between Adolescent Experiential Avoidance and Smartphone Addiction: A Study Based on Latent Transition Analysis and Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis
With the widespread use of smartphones among adolescents, smartphone addiction has become a growing mental health concern. Adolescents’ limited self-regulation makes them particularly vulnerable to using smartphones to escape real-life stress, heightening addiction risk. However, the heterogeneity of addictive behaviors and the dynamic role of experiential avoidance have been underexplored. This 6-month longitudinal study surveyed 547 Chinese primary and secondary students using the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS) and the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II). Latent profile analysis (LPA) and latent transition analysis (LTA) were applied to identify subgroups and examine transitions between these subgroups. Cross-lagged panel network analysis (CLPN) revealed key symptom interactions between experiential avoidance and addiction. The study identified two addiction subgroups: a stable “low-risk group” (84.9 percent) and a “high-risk group,” 51.4 percent of whom transitioned to low risk over time. Logistic regression showed that experiential avoidance significantly predicted high-risk membership (odds ratios [OR] = 1.083–1.102) and deterioration within the low-risk group (OR = 1.036). The CLPN identified “online intimacy” (SPA-3) and “hesitation and overcautious” (EA-7) as driver nodes, with “withdrawal symptoms” (SPA-2) serving as a central node. These findings emphasize the crucial role of experiential avoidance in adolescent smartphone addiction and suggest symptom-level targets for early intervention. The results support acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) as a promising approach for reducing smartphone addiction among youth.
China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). The 5th National Survey Report on Internet Usage Among Minors. Beijing, China; 2024. https://www.cnnic.net [Last accessed: May4, 2025].
2.
KwakMJ, ChoH, KimDJ. The role of motivation systems, anxiety, and low self-control in smartphone addiction among smartphone-based Social Networking Service (SNS) users. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022;19(11):6918; doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116918
3.
ZhangMX, WuAMS. Effects of smartphone addiction on sleep quality among Chinese university students: The mediating role of self-regulation and bedtime procrastination. Addict Behav2020;111:106552; doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106552
4.
Fischer-GroteL, KothgassnerOD, FelnhoferA. Risk factors for problematic smartphone use in children and adolescents: A review of existing literature. Neuropsychiatr2019;33(4):179–190; doi: 10.1007/s40211-019-00319-8
5.
YenCF, TangTC, YenJY, et al.Symptoms of problematic cellular phone use, functional impairment and its association with depression among adolescents in southern Taiwan. J Adolesc2009;32(4):863–873; doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.006
6.
WalshSP, WhiteKM, McD YoungR. Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people’s involvement with their mobile phones. Aust J Psychol2010;62(4):194–203; doi: 10.1080/00049530903567229
7.
ElhaiJD, DvorakRD, LevineJC, et al.Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. J Affect Disord2017;207:251–259; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030
8.
BillieuxJ, MaurageP, Lopez-FernandezO, et al.Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Curr Addict Rep2015;2(2):156–162; doi: 10.1007/s40429-015-0054-y
9.
LianSL, LiuQQ, SunXJ, et al.The relationship between mobile phone addiction and procrastination in college students: A moderated mediation effect analysis. Psychol Dev Educ2018;34(5):595–604; doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.05.10
10.
PanovaT, CarbonellX. Is smartphone addiction really an addiction? J Behav Addict2018;7(2):252–259; doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.49
11.
KussDJ, KristensenAM, Lopez-FernandezO. Internet addictions outside of Europe: A systematic literature review. Comput Human Behav2021;115:106621; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106621
12.
CooksonC, LuzonO, NewlandJ, et al.Examining the role of cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance in predicting anxiety and depression. Psychol Psychother2020;93(3):456–473; doi: 10.1111/papt.12233
13.
LeonardKA, EllisRA, OrcuttHK. Experiential avoidance as a mediator in the relationship between shame and post traumatic stress disorder: The effect of gender. Psychol Trauma2020;12(6):651–658; doi: 10.1037/tra0000601
14.
ChapmanAL, GratzKL, BrownMZ. Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: The experiential avoidance model. Behav Res Ther2006;44(3):371–394; doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.03.005
15.
Den OudenL, TiegoJ, LeeRSC, et al.The role of experiential avoidance in transdiagnostic compulsive behavior: A structural model analysis. Addict Behav2020;108:106464; doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106464
16.
WolniewiczCA, TiamiyuMF, WeeksJW, et al.Problematic smartphone use and relations with negative affect, fear of missing out, and fear of negative and positive evaluation. Psychiatry Res2018;262:618–623; doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.058
17.
XiongJ, HeC, WeiH. Negative school gossip and youth adolescents’ mobile phone addiction: Mediating roles of anxiety and experiential avoidance. Int J Environ Res Public Health2023;20(2):1444; doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021444
18.
BorsboomD, CramerAO. Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol2013;9:91–121; doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
19.
FriedEI, EpskampS, NesseRM, et al.What are ‘good’ depression symptoms? Comparing the centrality of DSM and non-DSM symptoms of depression in a network analysis. J Affect Disord2016;189:314–320; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.005
20.
GroenRN, RyanO, WigmanJTW, et al.Comorbidity between depression and anxiety: Assessing the role of bridge mental states in dynamic psychological networks. BMC Med2020;18(1):308; doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01738-z
21.
LunanskyG, NabermanJ, van BorkuloCD, et al.Intervening onpsychopathology networks: Evaluating intervention targets through simulations. Methods2022;204:29–37; doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.11.006
22.
XiangMQ, WangZR, MaB. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the smartphone addiction scale in adolescents. Chin J Clin Psychol2019;27(5):959–964; doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2019.05.022
23.
KwonM, KimDJ, ChoH, et al.The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One2013;8(12):e83558; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
24.
BondFW, HayesSC, BaerRA, et al.Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther2011;42(4):676–688; doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007
25.
CaoJ, JiY, ZhuZH. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) in college students. Chin Ment Health J2013;27:873–877.
26.
CollinsLM, LanzaST. Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ; 2009.
27.
Nylund-GibsonK, MasynKE. Covariates and mixture modeling: Results of a simulation study exploring the impact of misspecified models. Struct Equ Modeling2016;23(6):782–797; doi: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1221313
28.
EpskampS, FriedEI. A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychol Methods2018;23(4):617–634; doi: 10.1037/met0000167
29.
NylundKL, BellmoreA, NishinaA, et al.Subtypes, severity, and structural stability of peer victimization: What does latent class analysis say? Child Dev2007;78(6):1706–1722; doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01097.x
30.
JungT, WickramaKAS. An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social & Personality Psych2008;2(1):302–317; doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
31.
QiuHZ, LinBF. The Principles and Applications of Structural Equation Modeling. China Light Industry Press: Beijing; 2009.
32.
LinYH, LinYC, LeeYH, et al.Time distortion associated with smartphone addiction: Identifying smartphone addiction via a mobile application (App). J Psychiatr Res2015;65:139–145; doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.04.003
33.
VolkowND, MichaelidesM, BalerR. The neuroscience of drug reward and addiction. Physiol Rev2019;99(4):2115–2140; doi: 10.1152/physrev.00014.2018
34.
Kardefelt-WintherD. A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Comput Human Behav2014;31:351–354; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059
35.
Ruiz-RuanoAM, López-SalmerónMD, López PugaJ. Experiential avoidance and excessive smartphone use: A Bayesian approach. Adicciones2020;32(2):116–127; doi: 10.20882/adicciones.1151
36.
TwengeJM, MartinGN. Gender differences in associations between digital media use and psychological well-being: Evidence from three large datasets. J Adolesc2020;79:91–102; doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.018
37.
MeierA, MeltzerCE, ReineckeL.. Coping with Stress or Losing Control? Facebook-Induced Strains Among Emerging Adults as a Consequence of Escapism Versus Procrastination. In: ReineckeL, OliverMB (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Media Use and Well-Being. Routledge: New York, NY; 2018; pp. 167–186.
38.
ReineckeL, MeierA, BeutelME, et al.The relationship between trait procrastination, Internet use, and psychological functioning: Results from a community sample of German adolescents. Front Psychol2018;9:913; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00913
39.
YangXF, LiXF, HuP. Trait procrastination and mobile phone addiction: The mediating role of negative emotional experience. Chin J Clin Psychol2020;28(6):1148–1151; doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2020.06.014
40.
RozgonjukD, KattagoM, TähtK. Social media use in lectures mediates the relationship between procrastination and problematic smartphone use. Comput Human Behav2018;89:191–198; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.003
41.
ZhangHW. Experiential avoidance or ego depletion? A longitudinal study on the relationship between attribution of wealth gap and smartphone addiction[Master’s thesis].Xinyang: Xinyang Normal University; 2024. doi: 10.27435/d.cnki.gxsfc.2024.000107
42.
BorsboomD. A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry2017;16(1):5–13; doi: 10.1002/wps.20375
43.
HayesSC, LuomaJB, BondFW, et al.Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther2006;44(1):1–25; doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
44.
ZhangXQ, ZhangJH, ZhangKX, et al.Effects of different interventions on internet addiction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Affect Disord2022;313:56–71; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.013
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
