BioccaF, HarmsC, BurgoonJK. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence, 2003; 12(5):456–480; doi: 10.1162/105474603322761270
2.
OhSC, BailensonJN, WelchGF. A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Front Robot AI, 2018; 5:114; doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00114
3.
FeineJ, GnewuchU, MoranaS, et al.A taxonomy of social cues for conversational agents. Int J Hum Comput Stud, 2019; 132:138–161; doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.07.009
4.
LingEC, TussyadiahI, TuomiA, et al.Factors influencing users’ adoption and use of conversational agents: A systematic review. Psychol Mark, 2021; 38(7):1031–1051; doi: 10.1002/mar.21491
5.
BuçincaZ, MalayaMB, GajosKZ. To trust or to think: Cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on AI in AI-assisted decision-making. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact, 2021; 5(CSCW1):1–21; doi: 10.1145/3449287
6.
WutzM, HermesM, WinterV, et al.Factors influencing the acceptability, acceptance, and adoption of conversational agents in health care: Integrative review. J Med Internet Res, 2023; 25:e46548; doi: 10.2196/46548
7.
BhattacherjeeA. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. Mis Q, 2001; 25(3):351–370; doi: 10.2307/3250921
8.
RivaG, BrizziG, De GaspariS, et al.The comfort–growth paradox of technology: A cyberpsychological compass for innovation. Annu Rev CyberTher Telemed, 2025; 23:3–10.
