SonG, RuboM. Social Virtual Reality Elicits Natural Interaction Behavior with Self-Similar and Generic Avatars. Int J Human-Computer Studies, 2025; 199:103488; doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103488
2.
RuboM. Creating a social virtual reality application for psychological research: A tutorial. Behav Res Methods, 2025; 57(7):192; doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02693-4
3.
Di NataleAF, RepettoC, VillaniD. Desktop-based latforms versus video conferencing platforms for online synchronous learning in higher education: An experimental study to evaluate students’ learning gains and user experience. Computer Assisted Learning, 2024; 40(6):3454–3473.
4.
RivaG, WiederholdBK, MantovaniF. Searching for the Metaverse: Neuroscience of Physical and Digital Communities. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2024; 27(1):9–18; doi: 10.31234/osf.io/d4gmf
5.
BioccaF, HarmsC, BurgoonJK. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 2003; 12(5):456–480; doi: 10.1162/105474603322761270
6.
ZhangL. A Meta-Analysis method to advance design of technology-based learning tool: Combining qualitative and quantitative research to understand learning in relation to different technology features. J Sci Educ Technol, 2014; 23(1):145–159; doi: 10.1007/s10956-013-9460-x
7.
LiuY, WangT, WangK, et al.Collaborative learning quality classification through physiological synchrony recorded by wearable biosensors. Front Psychol, 2021; 12:674369; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674369
8.
Di NataleAF, BartolottaS, GaggioliA, et al.Exploring students’ acceptance and continuance intention in using immersive virtual reality and metaverse integrated learning environments: The case of an Italian university course. Educ Inf Technol, 2024; 29(12):14749–14768; doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12436-7
