Abstract
Background:
InterTAN is a specific type of cephalomedullary nail with a twin interlocking de-rotation and compression screw, which has inherent ability of anti-rotation. Whether to tighten or not to tighten the preloaded setscrew to allow or not allow secondary sliding in InterTan nail is controversial in clinical practice.
Methods:
We retrospectively collected 4 nonunion cases of unstable pertrochanteric femur fractures (AO/OTA-31A2), all were treated with InterTan nail and the preloaded setscrew was tightened in order to prevent further secondary sliding and femoral neck shortening.
Results:
After 6 months to 2 years follow-up, the fractures showed nonunion in radiography and the patients complained slight to middle degrees of pain, and had to use walking stick assistant in activities of daily life. Tightening the pre-loaded setscrew to prevent postoperative secondary sliding as static constructs might keep the femoral neck length, but lose the opportunity of telescoping for fracture impaction, and take the risk of healing complications, such as fracture nonunion, femoral head cutout or nail breakage.
Conclusions:
As the harm outweighs benefit, we advocate the preloaded setscrew in InterTan nail should not be tightened in standard-obliquity pertrochanteric hip fractures (AO/OTA-31A1 and A2).
Keywords
Introduction
Per/inter-trochanteric hip fractures are predominantly treated by fixed-angle sliding implants, such as extramedullary side-plates or intramedullary nails. 1,2 The head-neck fragment is fixed by lag screw or helical blade, and connected to the femoral shaft. After internal fixation, it is important for the head-neck to avoid rotation, but permit secondary sliding. The movement of the head-neck fragment is mostly guided to slide in an axial direction along the implant (helical blade or lag screw) to the lateral side (telescoping).
A set-screw is also called a grub screw. It has no head and is typically used in a nail through tightening or loosening with a hex key to prevent rotation of the lag screw (e.g. in gamma-3 nail) or the helical blade (e.g. in trochanteric femoral nail, TFN), but preserving the ability of sliding to lateral side for continuous dynamic bone compression at the fracture site to enhance fracture healing. 3
InterTAN is a new type of cephalomedullary nail with a twin interlocking de-rotation and compression screw. As the 2 interlocking screws (11.0 mm lag screw and 7.0 mm worm screw respectively) integrated together and works as a whole unit, it has the inherent ability of anti-rotation both in the oblique connection hole of the nail and in the bone of the femoral head. 4 However, there is a pre-loaded set-screw in InterTan nail. Locking the setscrew is optional, as stated in the manufacturer’s guidance. The indication for its tightening is to prevent excessive lateral side sliding, if the operative surgeon thinks it is necessary. However, as every coin has its 2 sides, tightening the setscrew is like a double-edged sword. One must balance the pros and cons of prevention of head-neck telescoping.
Case Reports
From January 2016 to December 2018, we collected 4 cases of non-unions in pertrochanteric hip fractures (AO/OTA 31A1 and A2) treated by InterTan nail (Table 1 and Figures 1 and 2). All the setscrews were tightened and locked in these 4 cases. There were 2 females and 2 males, with an average age of 62 years (range 50-74), and follow-up of at least 6 months.
Patient Data of Pertrochanteric Fracture Nonunion After InterTan Nailing With Setscrew Tightened and Locked.
VAS: visual analogue scale; LISS: limited invasive stabilization system; PFLP: proximal femoral locking plate.

Case 1. A 74-year-old female pertrochanteric hip fracture treated with closed reduction and InterTAN nail fixation. A, The fracture was AO/OTA-type 31A2.2. B and C, During operation, percutaneous instrument was applied for anterior cortex reduction. D and E, Fluoroscopy after operation, the fracture reduction quality and implant position were good. Note the setscrew was tightened and locked to avoid head-neck sliding after operation. F, The fracture was not healed in 4 months. G, As the bone quality was good and the instrument was strong, no lag screw cutout nor nail broken occurred yet in 7 months. Coronal CT reconstruction showed non-union. Sclerotic change was seen at the fracture site.

Case 2. A 73-year-old male pertrochanteric hip fracture treated with closed reduction and InterTAN nail fixation. A, the fracture was AO/OTA-type 31A2.1. B, Radiography at 1 week after InterTan nailing showed head-neck varus mal-alignment but the medial calcar contacted in smooth. C, Two years later, the fracture was not healed as demonstrated a clear medial cortex gap between head-neck and shaft. The nail swayed in coronal plane as there showed a sclerotic line around the nail. The cortex at the distal interlocking screw were enlarged as it sharing load from the screw.
Illustrative Case 1 (Figure 1)
A 74-year-old female patient suffered an AO/OTA 31A2.2 pertrochanteric hip fracture due to fall of standing. After pre-operative examination and preparation, she was operated with closed reduction and InterTan nail fixation on fracture table. Instrument fracture reduction was performed for anterior cortex apposition. The fracture reduction quality was good according to Baumgaertner’s, 5 as well as Chang’s 6 criteria. The operative procedure was as usual. The lower worm screw was turned to grasp the upper lag screw, and to compress the fracture gap by 5 mm. The pre-loaded setscrew was tightened and locked that intended to maintain the femoral neck length.
The patient was followed up regularly and allowed weight-bearing in 1 month. Unfortunately, the fracture was not healed in 4 months. As the patient’s bone quality was good and the instrument was strong, no lag screw cut-out nor nail breakage was occurred yet in 7 months. Coronal CT reconstruction showed non-union. Sclerotic change was seen at the fracture site (Figure 1). As there was pain in activities of daily life, the patient finally underwent revision fixation by reverse LISS plate in 10 months.
There were some shortcomings of the operation. On top of static locking, the proximal bone fragment (superolateral neck cortex) stopped at the nail, i.e. the hard cortex of the neck at the superolateral portion might obstruct further sliding of the head-neck fragment, even with the set screw not tightened, there might be some gap in the lower portion. The gap in the medial calcar was caused by “open effect” or “open deformity” during the insertion of the thick proximal nail. A more medial shift and reaming of the entry portal would probably solve the problem.
Illustrative Case 2 (Figure 2)
A 73-year-old male pertrochanteric fracture with AO/OTA-type 31A2.1 was treated by closed fracture reduction and InterTan nail fixation. Radiography at 1 week after nailing showed head-neck varus mal-alignment, the lag screw was placed in the upper part of the femoral head, but the medial calcar contacted in smooth. The patient was allowed standing and weight-bearing in 1 month. He complained slight to moderate pain in activities of daily life. Two years later, the fracture was noted non-union, as demonstrated by a clear medial cortex gap between head-neck and shaft. Furthermore, the nail had a movement of sway in the coronal plane as the radiography showed a sclerotic line around the nail. Bone enlargement was observed at the distal interlocking screw as stress reaction due to load sharing that transmitted from the screw (Figure 2).
Discussion
Operative treatment is the management of choice for most trochanteric hip fractures in current practice. 7 Key decisions for the surgeon are fracture reduction, choice of implant, and implant positioning. To date, the dynamic mechanism instruments of sliding hip screw/blade clearly indicates that this type of implant has a lower fracture-healing complication rate, as clinical big data showed. 7
InterTAN is a new type of cephalomedullary nail with a pre-loaded set-screw. As stated in the manufacturer’s guidance, using or not using the pre-loaded set-screw is optional. The resulting fixation with setscrew tightening and locking will be static with no opportunity for any collapse to occur at the fracture site. We want to argue this indication and advocate that the set-screw in InterTAN nail should be seldom tightened in standard-obliquity pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA31-A1 and -A2). The reasons are as follows:
Therefore, tightening the setscrew to prevent sliding as static constructs may keep a normal femoral neck length, but lose the possibility to make up technical shortcomings, and take the risk of fracture healing complications; on the other hand, not tightening the setscrew to allow head-neck dynamic sliding will promote fracture healing but take the risk of femoral neck shortening. Of the two evils choose the lesser. this is an idiom, two should not be replaced by 2. Now, we prefer to accept a limited shortening femoral neck, rather than the risk of fracture nonunion, femoral head cutout, or implant breakage, which need further revision surgery. In the treatment of 2-part intertrochanteric femur fractures (2018-AO/OTA: 31A1.2), Ricci et al. 11 stated that they did not use set screws in the INTERTAN group, and if it was used in the TFN group (the head-neck can be fixed with either a lag screw or a helical blade), up to approximately 10 mm dynamic sliding was allowed.
There are some common features of these 4 cases. Firstly, although some technical deficiencies maybe exist, the overall fracture reduction quality and implant placement position are good or acceptable. Secondly, the set-screw is tightened and locked and no head-neck sliding happened after operation. The InterTan nail becomes a static implant. Thirdly, patient’s bone quality is relatively good, and can provide enough grasp with the screws to avoid cutout. Fourthly, the nail is thicker and stronger and there is no nail breakage. With the assistance of a stick, all patients can walk and care themselves in daily life, but with persistent pain in some degree. And lastly, the reason for delayed union or non-union is mostly attributed to the static fixation mechanism.
Generally speaking, operation is an art of regret. In postoperative reviewing, we can always find some deficiencies that can be improved in the future. That makes medicine progress step by step. Kaufer in 1980 summarized 5 factors that determine the stability of bone-implant assembly after operation, i.e. bone quality (osteoporosis), fragment geometry (comminution), fracture reduction quality, implant selection, and implant placement (TAD/Cal-TAD). 12 The latter 3 factors can be controlled by the operative surgeon and should be pursued during operation. The fracture reduction is the first step in treatment, which is the preconditioning factor, and always is paramount compared with other factors. So, enhancing the fracture reduction quality is the first factor to improve mechanical stability and clinical outcome.
Postoperative standing and walking are very important for secondary stability. We use a postoperative stability score after operation to guide the rehabilitation progress and determine who can get out of bed early (7 or 8 points) or should be delayed (6 points or below). 13
Footnotes
Authors’ Note
Shou-Chao Du and Xiu-Hui Wang contribute equally to the study.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, no. 81772323), and The Featured Clinical Discipline Project of Shanghai Pudong New District (PWYts 2018-02).
